Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics

, Volume 40, Issue 4, pp 339–342 | Cite as

Henry S. Perkins: A guide to psychosocial and spiritual care at the end of life

Springer, 2016, xv + 486 pp, $109 (hardcover), ISBN: 978-1-4939-6802-2
  • Federico NicoliEmail author

Henry Perkins, an internist at the University of Texas Health Science Center in San Antonio, was a bioethics fellow under the guidance of Albert R. Jonsen. Over the course of his fellowship, and after serving both as a missionary doctor in Africa and as a clinical ethicist in the United States, Perkins reached the conclusion that every illness is multidimensional, not just bioscientific, with all of these dimensions—particularly the psychosocial, social, ethical, cultural, and spiritual ones—deserving attention.

The question that the panic-stricken patient asks in response to a new fatal diagnosis is often “How long do I have to live, Doctor?” This question is, in my opinion, key to this great book, as so much of how the patient responds to her diagnosis depends upon the doctor’s immediate answer.

The author organizes his work into two parts. After the first introductory section, the second through fifth chapters present basic information necessary for those who are not medically...


  1. 1.
    Nicoli, Federico, and Mario Picozzi. 2017. Killing or allowing someone to die: A difference defined exclusively by the criteria of “terminal”? Making decisions regarding a patient’s death. Medicina Historica 1: 41–47.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kassirer, Jerome P. 2010. Teaching clinical reasoning: Case-based and coached. Academic Medicine 85: 1118–1124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Johnson, Julia Overturf, Daniel P. Sulmasy, and Marie T. Nolan. 2007. Patients’ experiences of being a burden on family in terminal illness. Journal of Hospice and Palliative Nursing 9: 264–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Giuseppe, Deledda, Francesca Moretti, Michela Rimondini, and Christa Zimmermann. 2013. How patients want their doctor to communicate: A literature review on primary care patients’ perspective. Patient Education and Counseling 90: 297–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Biotechnology and Life Sciences Department, Center for Clinical EthicsInsubria UniversityVareseItaly
  2. 2.Clinical Ethics Service, Domus Salutis ClinicTeresa Camplani FoundationBresciaItaly

Personalised recommendations