Advertisement

Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics

, Volume 39, Issue 1, pp 85–90 | Cite as

Inmaculada de Melo-Martín: Rethinking reprogenetics: enhancing ethical analyses of reprogenetic technologies. Oxford University Press, New York, 2017, 288 pp, ISBN 9780190460204

  • Natalia Fernández-JimenoEmail author
Article
  • 151 Downloads

In her book Rethinking Reprogenetics, Inmaculada de Melo-Martín questions the enthusiastic vision of reprogenetics advocated by bioethicists in recent decades. Her clear and orderly reasoning responds to those arguments, delving deep into discussion with John Harris, Julian Savulescu, Nicholas Agar, Allen Buchanan, John Robertson, David DeGrazia, and Lee Silver. The author approaches this issue from a philosophical viewpoint, focusing on ethical matters in scientific and technological knowledge, its practices, and its limits. Contrary to “the enthusiastic reprogenetics supporters” (p. 14), she incorporates a feminist perspective into her analysis, which she uses to show how women have been omitted from the discussion. This oversight makes the hierarchies that exist between women and men invisible, and it obscures the role that women play in implementations of and decisions about these technologies as well as the influence of patriarchal values in the social construction of scientific...

References

  1. 1.
    Harris, John. 2005. No sex selection please, we’re British. Journal of Medical Ethics 31: 286–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Harris, John. 2007. Enhancing evolution: The ethical case for making better people. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Savulescu, Julian. 1999. Sex selection: The case for. Medical Journal of Australia 171: 272–375.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Savulescu, Julian. 2002. Education and debate: Deaf lesbians, “designer disability”, and the future of medicine. BMJ 325: 771–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fausto-Stearling, Anne. 2000. Sexing the body: Gender politics and the construction of sexuality. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Laqueur, Thomas. 1990. Making sex: Body and gender from the Greeks to Freud. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Savulescu, Julian, and Guy Kahane. 2009. The moral obligation to create children with the best chance of the best life. Bioethics 23: 274–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Harris, John. 2015. Germline modification and the burden of human existence. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 25: 6–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Savulescu, Julian. 2005. New breeds of humans: The moral obligation to enhance. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 10: 36–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    O’Donnell, Norah. 2014. Breeding out disease. 60 Minutes, CBS, October 26.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Green, Ronald Michael. 2007. Babies by design: The ethics of genetic choice. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rich, Adrienne. 1976. Of woman born: Motherhood as experience and institution. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tubert, Silvia. 1991. Mujeres sin sombra: Maternidad y tecnología. Madrid: Siglo XXI.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Harding, Sandra. 2008. Sciences from below: Feminisms, postcolonialities, and modernities. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kourany, Janet A. 2010. Philosophy of science after feminism. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lacey, Hugh. 2005. Values and objectivity in science. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departamento de Filosofía, Facultad de Filosofía y LetrasUniversity of OviedoOviedoSpain

Personalised recommendations