“Big eye” surgery: the ethics of medicalizing Asian features
- 871 Downloads
The popularity of surgical modifications of race-typical features among Asian women has generated debates on the ethical implications of the practice. Focusing on blepharoplasty as a representative racial surgery, this article frames the ethical discussion by viewing Asian cosmetic surgery as an example of medicalization, which can be interpreted in two forms: treatment versus enhancement. In the treatment form, medicalization occurs by considering cosmetic surgery as remedy for pathologized Asian features; the pathologization usually occurs in reference to western features as the norm. In the enhancement form, medicalization occurs by using medical means to improve physical features to achieve a certain type of beauty or physical appearance. Each type of medicalization raises slightly different ethical concerns. The problem with treatment medicalization lies in the pathologization of Asian features, which is oppressive as it continues to reinforce racial norms of appearance and negative stereotypes. Enhancement medicalization is ethically problematic because cosmetic surgery tends to conflate beauty and health as medical goals of surgery, overemphasizing the value of appearance that can further displace women’s control over their own bodies. I conclude that in both forms of medicalization, cosmetic surgery seems to narrowly frame a complex psychosocial issue involving physical appearance as a matter that can be simply solved through surgical means.
KeywordsEthics Cosmetic surgery Asian Medicalization Blepharoplasty
This research was funded by Macquarie University through the International Macquarie University Research Excellence Scholarship (IMQRES). I would like to thank Prof. Wendy Rogers for her comments that greatly improved the manuscript. Funding was provided by Macquarie University (Grant No. 2014092).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.
Human and animal rights statement
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by the author.
- 1.International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. 2015. ISAPS international survey on aesthetic/cosmetic procedures performed in 2014. http://www.isaps.org/Media/Default/global-statistics/2015%20ISAPS%20Results.pdf. Accessed May 12 2015.
- 3.Sandel, Michael J. 2004. The case against perfection: What’s wrong with designer children, bionic athletes, and genetic engineering. Atlantic Monthly 292 (3): 50.Google Scholar
- 7.Bartky, Sandra Lee. 1990. Femininity and domination: Studies in the phenomenology of oppression. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
- 8.Bordo, Susan. 2003. Unbearable weight: Feminism, Western culture, and the body. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- 9.Little, Margaret Olivia. 1998. Cosmetic surgery, suspect norms, and the ethics of complicity. In Enhancing human traits: Ethical and social implications, ed. Erik Parens, 162–176. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
- 11.Merianos, Ashley L., Rebecca A. Vidourek, and Keith A. King. 2013. Medicalization of female beauty: A content analysis of cosmetic procedures. Qualitative Report 18 (46): 1–14.Google Scholar
- 14.Gilman, Sander L. 1999. Making the body beautiful: A cultural history of aesthetic surgery. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- 15.Mazzola, Riccardo F., and Moshe Kon. 2010. EURAPS at 20 years: A brief history of European plastic surgery from the Société Européenne de Chirurgie Structive to the European Association of Plastic Surgeons (EURAPS). Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery 63 (6): 888–895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Laing, Ronald David. 1971. The politics of the family and other essays. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
- 18.Heyes, Cressida. 2009. All cosmetic surgery is “ethnic”: Asian eyelids, feminist indignation, and the politics of whiteness. In Cosmetic surgery: A feminist primer, 191–205. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- 19.Eyelid Surgery. 2015. Eyelid surgery. http://www.plasticsurgery-sydney.com.au/eyelid-surgery/. Accessed June 25 2015.
- 22.Advance Beauty Cosmetic Surgery. 2015. Racial facial: Asian eyelid surgery. http://www.advancecosmetic.com/eng/media/. Accessed Nov 12 2015.
- 23.Bostrom, Nick, and Rebecca Roache. 2007. Ethical issues in human enhancement. In New waves in applied ethics, ed. Clark Wolf, Jesper Ryberg, and Thomas Søbirk Petersen, 120–152. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
- 25.McCurdy, J.A., Jr. 2006. Beautiful eyes: Characteristics and application to aesthetic surgery. Facial Plastic Surgery 22 (3): 204–214.Google Scholar
- 27.Chang, Juju, and Victoria Thompson. 2014. South Korea’s growing obsession with cosmetic surgery. Nightline. http://abcnews.go.com/Lifestyle/south-koreas-growing-obsession-cosmetic-surgery/story?id=24123409. Accessed Aug 14 2015.
- 28.Wonjin Beauty Medical Group. 2013. Eyelid surgery system. http://wonjinbeauty.com/index.asp?inc=eyelid/Eyelid_Surgery. Accessed Oct 12 2015.
- 29.ID Hospital. 2012. Types of eyes. http://eng.idhospital.com/eye/eye020101.php. Accessed Oct 25 2015.
- 30.Elliott, Carl. 2004. Better than well: American medicine meets the American dream. New York, NY: WW Norton and Company.Google Scholar
- 31.Pitangui Plastic Center. 2015. What constitutes the most ideal eyes? http://pitanguiplasticsurgery.com/plastic-surgery-center/. Accessed Oct 25 2015.
- 32.Carlson, Karen J., Stephanie A. Esenstat, and Terra Ziporyn. 1996. The new Harvard guide to women’s health. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar