Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics

, Volume 36, Issue 3, pp 197–213 | Cite as

Palliative sedation, foregoing life-sustaining treatment, and aid-in-dying: what is the difference?

Article

Abstract

After a review of terminology, I identify—in addition to Margaret Battin’s list of five primary arguments for and against aid-in-dying—the argument from functional equivalence as another primary argument. I introduce a novel way to approach this argument based on Bernard Lonergan’s generalized empirical method (GEM). Then I proceed on the basis of GEM to distinguish palliative sedation, palliative sedation to unconsciousness when prognosis is less than two weeks, and foregoing life-sustaining treatment from aid-in-dying. I conclude (1) that aid-in-dying must be justified on its own merits and not on the basis of these well-established palliative care practices; and (2) that societies must decide, in weighing the merits of aid-in-dying, whether or not to make the judgment that no life is better than life-like-this (however this is specified) part of their operative value structure.

Keywords

Aid-in-dying Palliative sedation Foregoing life-sustaining treatment Judgment of value Good of order Generalized empirical method Bernard Lonergan Functional equivalence argument 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Earlier versions of this paper were presented at the West Coast Methods Institute in Los Angeles in April 2014 and at the Lonergan Workshop in Boston in June 2014. I would like to thank David Ndegwah for challenging me to recognize that different viewpoints set the conditions for better understanding, especially during times of rapid historical change.

References

  1. 1.
    Orentlicher, D., T.M. Pope, and B.A. Rich. 2014. The changing legal climate for physician aid in dying. Journal of the American Medical Association 311: 1961–1962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Campbell, C.S., and M.A. Black. 2014. Dignity, death, and dilemmas: A study of Washington hospices and physician-assisted death. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 47: 137–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Siegel, A.M., D.A. Sisti, and A.L. Caplan. 2014. Pediatric euthanasia in Belgium: Disturbing developments. Journal of the American Medical Association 311: 1963–1964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    National Hospice and Palliative Care Organization. 2005. Commentary and resolution on physician assisted suicide. National Hospice & Palliative Care Organization archive. http://www.nhpco.org/sites/default/files/public/PAS_Resolution_Commentary.pdf. Accessed on August 26, 2014.
  5. 5.
    Hospice and Palliative Nurses Association. 2011. Legalization of assisted suicide. Hospice and Palliative Nurses Association archive. https://www.hpna.org/DisplayPage.aspx?Title1=Position%20Statements. Accessed on August 26, 2014.
  6. 6.
    American Nurses Association. 2013. Euthanasia, assisted suicide, and aid in dying. American Nurses Association archive. http://www.nursingworld.org/positionstatements. Accessed on August 26, 2014.
  7. 7.
    American Medical Association. 2013. AMA’s code of ethics. American Medical Association archive. http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/physician-resources/medical-ethics/code-medical-ethics.page? Accessed on August 26, 2014.
  8. 8.
    Battin, M.P. 2005. Ending life: Ethics and the way we die. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lynn, J., J. Harrold, and J.L. Schuster. 2011. Handbook for mortals, 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pope, T.M., and A. West. 2014. Legal briefing: Voluntarily stopping eating and drinking. Journal of Clinical Ethics 25(1): 68–80.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Eddy, D.M. 1994. A piece of my mind: A conversation with my mother. Journal of the American Medical Association 272: 179–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Quill, T.E., B. Lo, and D.W. Brock. 1997. Palliative options of last resort: A comparison of voluntarily stopping eating and drinking, terminal sedation, physician-assisted suicide, and voluntary active euthanasia. Journal of the American Medical Association 278: 2099–2104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Broeckaert, B. 2000. Palliative sedation defined or why and when sedation is not euthanasia. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 20: S58.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jansen, L.A., and D.P. Sulmasy. 2002. Sedation, alimentation, hydration, and equivocation: Careful conversation about care at the end of life. Annals of Internal Medicine 136(11): 845–849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Morita, T., Y. Chinone, M. Ikenaga, et al. 2005. Ethical validity of palliative sedation therapy: A multicenter, prospective, observational study conducted on specialized palliative care units in Japan. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 30: 308–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dean, M.M., V. Cellarius, B. Henry, D. Oneschuk, and S.L. Librach. 2012. Framework for continuous palliative sedation therapy in Canada. Journal of Palliative Medicine 15: 870–879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Quill, T.E., B. Lo, D.W. Brock, and A. Meisel. 2009. Last-resort options for palliative sedation. Annals of Internal Medicine 151(6): 421–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Raus, K., J. Brown, C. Seale, et al. 2014. Continuous sedation until death: The everyday moral reasoning of physicians, nurses and family caregivers in the UK, The Netherlands and Belgium. BMC Medical Ethics 15: 14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rys, S., F. Mortier, L. Deliens, R. Deschepper, M.P. Battin, and J. Bilsen. 2013. Continuous sedation until death: Moral justifications of physicians and nurses—A content analysis of opinion pieces. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 16: 533–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    ten Have, H., and J.V. Welie. 2014. Palliative sedation versus euthanasia: An ethical assessment. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 47: 123–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Davis, M.P., and P.A. Ford. 2005. Palliative sedation definition, practice, outcomes, and ethics. Journal of Palliative Medicine 8: 699–701; author reply 702-3.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Brinkkemper, T., A.M. van Norel, K.M. Szadek, S.A. Loer, W.W. Zuurmond, and R.S. Perez. 2013. The use of observational scales to monitor symptom control and depth of sedation in patients requiring palliative sedation: A systematic review. Palliative Medicine 27: 54–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Morita, T., Y. Chinone, M. Ikenaga, et al. 2005. Efficacy and safety of palliative sedation therapy: A multicenter, prospective, observational study conducted on specialized palliative care units in Japan. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 30: 320–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Claessens, P., J. Menten, P. Schotsmans, and B. Broeckaert. 2012. Level of consciousness in dying patients. The role of palliative sedation: A longitudinal prospective study. American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Care 29: 195–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Billings, J.A. 2014. Palliative sedation. In Palliative care and ethics, ed. T.E. Quill and F.G. Miller, 209–232. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    AAHPM Board of Directors. 2006. Statement on palliative sedation. American Association of Hospice and Palliative Medicine archive. http://aahpm.org/positions/palliative-sedation. Accessed on August 26, 2014.
  27. 27.
    Sessler, C.N., M.S. Gosnell, M.J. Grap, et al. 2002. The Richmond agitation-sedation scale: Validity and reliability in adult intensive care unit patients. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 166: 1338–1344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Battin, M.P. 2010. The irony of supporting physician-assisted suicide: A personal account. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 13: 403–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rachels, J. 1975. Active and passive euthanasia. New England Journal of Medicine 292: 78–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Brock, D.W. 1992. Voluntary active euthanasia. Hastings Center Report 22(2): 10–22.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Brock, D.W. 1999. A critique of three objections to physician-assisted suicide. Ethics 109: 519–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kamm, F.M. 2013. Four-step arguments for physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia. In Bioethical prescriptions, 53–83. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lonergan, B. 1992. Insight. Ed. R.M. Doran and F.E. Crowe. Toronto: Toronto University Press.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lonergan, B. 1985. A third collection. New York: Paulist Press.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lonergan, B. 2003. Method in theology. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Lonergan, B. 1988. Cognitional structure. In Collection, ed. F.E. Crowe and R.M. Doran, 205–221. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Lonergan, B. 2001. Two diagrams. In Phenomenology and logic: The Boston College lectures on mathematical logic and existentialism, ed. P.J. McShane, 319–323. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Aquinas, T. 2012. Summa theologiae. Trans. L. Shapcote. Ed. J. Mortensen and E. Alarcon. Lander, Wyoming: The Aquinas Institute for the Study of Sacred Doctrine.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Quill, T.E. 1993. The ambiguity of clinical intentions. New England Journal of Medicine 329: 1039–1040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Douglas, C., I. Kerridge, and R. Ankeny. 2008. Managing intentions: The end-of-life administration of analgesics and sedatives, and the possibility of slow euthanasia. Bioethics 22: 388–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Jansen, L.A. 2010. Disambiguating clinical intentions: The ethics of palliative sedation. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35: 19–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Zagar, J. 1984. Acting on principles: A Thomistic perspective in making moral decisions. Lanham, MD: University Press of America Inc.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Aristotle. 2009. Nicomachean ethics. Trans. W.D. Ross. Ed. L. Brown. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Uniacke, S. 2007. The doctrine of double effect. In Principles of health care ethics, 2nd ed, ed. R.E. Ashcroft, 263–268. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Cavanaugh, T.A. 2006. Double-effect reasoning. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    McIntyre, A. 2001. Doing away with double effect. Ethics 111: 219–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Morita, T., J. Tsunoda, S. Inoue, and S. Chihara. 2001. Effects of high dose opioids and sedatives on survival in terminally ill cancer patients. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 21: 282–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Rousseau, P. 2002. Careful conversation about care at the end of life. Annals of Internal Medicine 137: 1008–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Morita, T., M. Miyashita, R. Kimura, I. Adachi, and Y. Shima. 2004. Emotional burden of nurses in palliative sedation therapy. Palliative Medicine 18: 550–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Sulmasy, D.P., F. Curlin, G.S. Brungardt, and T. Cavanaugh. 2010. Justifying different levels of palliative sedation. Annals of Internal Medicine 152: 332–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Jansen, L.A. 2003. The moral irrelevance of proximity to death. Journal of Clinical Ethics 14: 49–58.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Berger, J.T. 2010. Rethinking guidelines for the use of palliative sedation. Hastings Center Report 40: 32–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Niebuhr, H.R. 1963. The responsible self. New York: Harper and Row, Publishers.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Lonergan, B. 2004. What are judgments of value? In Philosophical and theological papers 1965–1980, ed. R.M. Doran and F.E. Crowe, 140–156. Toronto: Toronto University Press.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Morita, T., J. Tsunoda, S. Inoue, and S. Chihara. 1999. Survival prediction of terminally ill cancer patients by clinical symptoms: Development of a simple indicator. Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology 29: 156–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Lipuma, S.H. 2013. Continuous sedation until death as physician-assisted suicide/euthanasia: A conceptual analysis. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 38: 190–204.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Sulmasy, D.P. 1998. Killing and allowing to die: Another look. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 26: 55–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Rachels, J. 2001. Killing and letting die. In Encyclopedia of ethics, vol. 2, ed. L. Becker and C. Becker, 947–950. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Prince-Paul, M., and B.J. Daly. 2005. Ethical considerations in palliative care. In Oxford textbook of palliative nursing, ed. B.R. Ferrell and N. Coyle, 1157–1172. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Brock, D.W. 1993. Quality of life measures in health care and medical ethics. In Quality of life, ed. M. Nussbaum and A. Sen, 95–132. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Miller, F.G., J.J. Fins, and L. Snyder. 2000. Assisted suicide compared with refusal of treatment: A valid distinction? University of Pennsylvania Center for Bioethics Assisted Suicide Consensus Panel. Annals of Internal Medicine 132: 470–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Miller, F.G., R.D. Truog, and D.W. Brock. 2010. Moral fictions and medical ethics. Bioethics 24: 453–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Cherny, N.I. 2006. Palliative sedation. In Textbook of palliative medicine, ed. E. Bruera, I.J. Higginson, C. Ripamonti, and C.F. von Gunten, 976–987. London: Hodder Arnold.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Berger, P.T., and T. Luckmann. 1966. The social construction of reality. New York: Irvington Publishers Inc.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    ten Have, H.A.M.J., and J.V.M. Welie. 2005. Death and medical power: An ethical analysis of Dutch euthanasia practice. London: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Duffy, T.P. 2014. Physician assistance in dying: A subtler slippery slope. Hastings Center Report 44: 1p following 48.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Welie, J.V., and H.A. ten Have. 2014. The ethics of forgoing life-sustaining treatment: Theoretical considerations and clinical decision making. Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine 9: 14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Sulmasy, D.P. 2011. Speaking of the value of life. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 21: 181–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Lawrence, F. 2007. The ethics of authenticity and the human good, in honour of Michael Vertin, an authentic colleague. In The importance of insight: Essays in honour of Michael Vertin, ed. J.J. Liptay, Jr. and D.S. Liptay, 127–150. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Carter v. Canada (Attorney General), 2015 SCC 5.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Lonergan InstituteBoston CollegeChestnut HillUSA

Personalised recommendations