Advertisement

Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics

, Volume 34, Issue 2, pp 117–131 | Cite as

The degree of certainty in brain death: probability in clinical and Islamic legal discourse

  • Faisal QaziEmail author
  • Joshua C. Ewell
  • Ayla Munawar
  • Usman Asrar
  • Nadir Khan
Article

Abstract

The University of Michigan conference “Where Religion, Policy, and Bioethics Meet: An Interdisciplinary Conference on Islamic Bioethics and End-of-Life Care” in April 2011 addressed the issue of brain death as the prototype for a discourse that would reflect the emergence of Islamic bioethics as a formal field of study. In considering the issue of brain death, various Muslim legal experts have raised concerns over the lack of certainty in the scientific criteria as applied to the definition and diagnosis of brain death by the medical community. In contrast, the medical community at large has not required absolute certainty in its process, but has sought to eliminate doubt through cumulative diagnostic modalities and supportive scientific evidence. This has recently become a principal model, with increased interest in data analysis and evidence-based medicine with the intent to analyze and ultimately improve outcomes. Islamic law has also long employed a systematic methodology with the goal of eliminating doubt from rulings regarding the question of certainty. While ample criticism of the scientific criteria of brain death (Harvard criteria) by traditional legal sources now exists, an analysis of the legal process in assessing brain death, geared toward informing the clinician’s perspective on the issue, is lacking. In this article, we explore the role of certainty in the diagnostic modalities used to establish diagnoses of brain death in current medical practice. We further examine the Islamic jurisprudential approach vis-à-vis the concept of certainty (yaqīn). Finally, we contrast the two at times divergent philosophies and consider what each perspective may contribute to the global discourse on brain death, understanding that the interdependence that exists between the theological, juridical, ethical, and medical/scientific fields necessitates an open discussion and active collaboration between all parties. We hope that this article serves to continue the discourse that was successfully begun by this initial interdisciplinary endeavor at the University of Michigan.

Keywords

Brain death Personhood Apnea test Fiqh Zann Ijtihad 

References

  1. 1.
    Taylor, R.M. 1997. Reexamining the definition and criteria of death. Seminars in Neurology 17(3): 265–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wijdicks, Eelco F.M. 2002. Brain death worldwide: Accepted fact but no global consensus in diagnostic criteria. Neurology 58(1): 20–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Blennow, K., N. Bogdanovic, I. Alafuzoff, R. Ekman, and P. Davidsson. 1996. Synaptic pathology in Alzheimer’s disease: Relation to severity of dementia, but not to senile plaques, neurofibrillary tangles, or the ApoE4 allele. Journal of Neural Transmission 103(5): 603–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Geddes, J.W., T.L. Tekirian, N.S. Soultanian, J.W. Ashford, D.G. Davis, and W.R. Markesbery. 1997. Comparison of neuropathologic criteria for the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiology of Aging 18(S4): 99–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Report of the Ad Hoc Committee of the Harvard Medical School to Examine the Definition of Brain Death. 1968. A definition of irreversible coma. The Journal of the American Medical Association 205(6): 337–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fiqh Academy. 1986. Book of decrees. Decree no. 5. Third Conference of Islamic Jurists, Amman, Jordan, Oct 11–16, 1986.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws. 1980. Uniform determination of death act. http://www.law.upenn.edu/bll/archives/ulc/fnact99/1980s/udda80.htm. Accessed 6 April 2012.
  8. 8.
    American Academy of Neurology. 1995. Practice parameters for determining brain death in adults. Neurology 45: 1012–1014.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wijdicks, E.F.M., P.N. Varelas, G.S. Gronseth, and D.M. Greer. 2010. Evidence-based guideline update: Determining brain death in adults report of the quality standards subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 74(23): 1911–1918.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Youngner, S.J., and R.M. Arnold. 2001. Philosophical debates about the definition of death: Who cares? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 26(5): 527–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Warren, M.A. 1973. On the moral and legal status of abortion. The Monist Journal 57(1): 43–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shewmon, D.A. 2009. Brain death: Can it be resuscitated? Hastings Center Report 39(2): 18–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lederer, S.E. 2008. Putting death in context. Hastings Center Report 38(6): 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Atlas, S.W., R.S. Howard II, J. Maldjian, et al. 1996. Functional magnetic resonance imaging of regional brain activity in patients with intracerebral gliomas: Findings and implications for clinical management. Journal of Neurosurgery 38(2): 329–338.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Moritz, C.H., H.A. Rowley, V.M. Haughton, K.R. Swartz, J. Jones, and B. Badie. 2001. Functional MR imaging assessment of a non-responsive brain injured patient. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 19(8): 1129–1132.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Verheijde, J.L., M.Y. Rady, and J.L. McGregor. 2009. Brain death, states of impaired consciousness, and physician-assisted death for end-of-life organ donation and transplantation. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 12(4): 409–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Powner, D., M. Hernandez, and R. Rives. 2004. Variability among hospital policies for determining brain death in adults. Journal of Critical Care Medicine 32(6): 1284–1288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jorgensen, E.O., and A. Malchow-Moler. 1981. Natural history of global and critical brain ischaemia. Part I: EEG and neurological signs during the first year after cardiopulmonary resuscitation in patients subsequently regaining consciousness. Resuscitation 9(2): 133–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wijdicks, E.F.M. 1995. Determining brain death in adults. Neurology 45: 1003–1011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Young, G.B. 2012. Diagnosis of brain death. UpToDate. http://www.uptodate.com/contents/diagnosis-of-brain-death. Accessed 31 March 2013.
  21. 21.
    Greitz, T., E. Gordon, G. Kolmodin, and L. Widen. 1973. Aortocranial and carotid angiography in determination of brain death. Journal of Neuroradiology 5(1): 13–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Flowers, W.M., and B.R. Patel. 2000. Persistence of cerebral blood flow after brain death. Southern Medical Journal 93(4): 364–370.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Braum, M., X. Ducrocq, J.C. Huot, G. Audibert, R. Anxionnat, and L. Picard. 1997. Intravenous angiography in brain death: Report of 140 patients. Journal of Neuroradiology 39(6): 400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rieke, A., B. Regli, H.P. Mattle, C. Brekenfeld, J. Gralla, G. Schroth, and C. Ozdoba. 2011. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) to prove circulatory arrest for the diagnosis of brain death in the context of organ transplantation. Swiss Medicine Weekly 141: w13261.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wijdicks, E.F.M., A.A. Rabinstein, E.M. Manno, and J.D. Atkinson. 2008. Pronouncing brain death: Contemporary practice and safety of the apnea test. Neurology 71(16): 1240–1244.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Machado, C., J. Perez, C. Scherle, A. Areu, and A. Pando. 2009. Brain death diagnosis and apnea test safety. Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology 12(3): 197–200.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Coimbra, C.G. 1999. Implications of ischemic penumbra for the diagnosis of brain death. Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research 32(12): 1479–1487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Melano, R., M.E. Adum, A. Scarlatti, R. Bazzano, and J.L. Araujo. 2002. Apnea test in diagnosis of brain death: Comparison of two methods and analysis of complications. Transplant Proceedings Journal 34(1): 11–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Joffe, A.R., N.R. Anton, and J.P. Duff. 2010. The apnea test: Rationale, confounders, and criticism. Journal of Child Neurology 25(11): 1435–1443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wijdicks, E.F.M., E.M. Manno, and S.R. Holets. 2005. Ventilator self-cycling may falsely suggest patient effort during brain death determination. Neurology 65(5): 774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Padela, A.I., A. Arozullah, and E. Moosa. 2011. Brain death in Islamic ethico-legal deliberation: challenges for applied Islamic bioethics. Bioethics 27(3): 132–139.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Moosa, E. 1999. Languages of change in Islamic law: Redefining death in modernity. Journal of Islamic Studies 38(3): 314–321.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Nowels, D. 2004. Completing and signing the death certificate. American Family Physician 70(9): 1813–1818.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Qur’an 17:85. http://quran.com/17/85. Accessed 31 March 2013.
  35. 35.
    Sachedina, A. 2009. Islamic biomedical ethics: Principles and application. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Krawietz, B. 2003. Brain death and Islamic traditions: Shifting borders of life? Islamic ethics of life: Abortion, war, and euthanasia. Columbia: University of South Carolina.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Bedir, A., and S. Aksoy. 2010. Brain death revisited: It is not ‘complete death’ according to Islamic sources. Journal of Medical Ethics 37(5): 290–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Jackson, S.A. 2003. Shariah, democracy, and the modern nation-state: Some reflections on Islam, popular rule, and pluralism. Fordham Internal Law Journal 27(1). Article 5.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kamali, M.H. 2003. Principles of Islamic jurisprudence. Cambridge: Islamic Texts Society.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Weiss, B. 1988. The spirit of Islamic law. Athens: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Weiss, B. 1978. Interpretation in Islamic law: The theory of ijtihād. American Journal of Comparative Law 26(2): 199–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Moosa, E. 2002. Interface of science and jurisprudence: Dissonant Gazes at the body in modern Muslim ethics. In God, life, and the cosmos, eds. T. Peters, M. Iqbal, and S.N. Haq. England: Ashgate Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    A-Jubayr, H. 2008. General principles of Islamic law and their practical applications for medicine. Islam Today. http://en.islamtoday.net/artshow-385-3398.htm. Accessed 31 March 2013
  44. 44.
    Yacoub, A. 2001. The Fiqh of medicine: Responses in Islamic jurisprudence to developments in medical science. London, UK: Taha Publishers Ltd.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Hallaq, W.B. 1997. A history of Islamic legal theories: An introduction to Sunni uṣūl al-fiqh. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Al-Badawi, M. 2002. Man and the universe, an Islamic perspective. Rev. and exp ed. Amman, Jordan: Wakeel Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Faisal Qazi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Joshua C. Ewell
    • 2
  • Ayla Munawar
    • 2
  • Usman Asrar
    • 3
  • Nadir Khan
    • 3
  1. 1.Claremont Lincoln UniversityPomonaUSA
  2. 2.Western University of Health SciencesPomonaUSA
  3. 3.PomonaUSA

Personalised recommendations