Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics

, Volume 33, Issue 3, pp 199–205 | Cite as

Doing the best for one’s child: satisficing versus optimizing parentalism

Commentary

Abstract

The maxim “parents should do what is in the best interests of their child” seems like an unassailable truth, and yet, as I argue here, there are serious problems with it when it is taken seriously. One problem concerns the sort of demands such a principle places on parents; the other concerns its larger social implications when conceived as part of a national policy for the rearing of children. The theory of parenting that creates these problems I call “optimizing parentalism.” To avoid them, I define and defend a new and more morally appealing theory, “satisficing parentalism.”

Keywords

Best interests of the child Child-centered society Consequentialism Optimizing parentalism Parental obligation Parental independence Satisficing parentalism 

References

  1. 1.
    Salter, Erica K. 2012. Deciding for a child: a comprehensive analysis of the best interest standard. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics. doi:10.1007/s11017-012-9219-z.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Slote, Michael, and Philip Pettit. 1984. Satisficing consequentialism. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 58(suppl.):139–176.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bradley, Ben. 2006. Against satisficing consequentialism. Utilitas 18: 97–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    O’Neill, Onora. 1979. Begetting, bearing, and rearing. In Having children, ed. O. O’Neill, and W. Ruddick, 25–38. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Little, Margaret. 2003. The morality of abortion. In Ethical issues in modern medicine, 6th ed, ed. B. Steinbock, J. Arras, and A. London, 492–500. Boston: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Daniels, Norman. 2008. Just health. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bronfenbrenner, Urie. 1972. Who cares for America’s children? In The future of the family, ed. L.K. Howe, 139–150. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.City CollegeCity University of New YorkNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations