Advertisement

On a communitarian approach to bioethics

  • Amitai EtzioniEmail author
Article

Abstract

A communitarian approach to bioethics adds a core value to a field that is often more concerned with considerations of individual autonomy. Some interpretations of liberalism put the needs of the patient over those of the community; authoritarian communitarianism privileges the needs of society over those of the patient. Responsive communitarianism’s main starting point is that we face two conflicting core values, autonomy and the common good, and that neither should be a priori privileged, and that we have principles and procedures that can be used to work out this conflict but not to eliminate it. This discussion uses the debate in the US over funding for entitlements as a case study to apply the values of communitarian bioethics.

Keywords

Autonomy Community Common good Medicare 

References

  1. 1.
    Etzioni, Amitai. 1973. Genetic fix: The next technological revolution. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Etzioni, Amitai. 1997. The new golden rule: Community and morality in a democratic society. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Etzioni, Amitai. 2011. Authoritarian versus communitarian bioethics. Journal of Medical Ethics 37: 17–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hansen, Helena, and Nora Groce. 2003. Human immunodeficiency virus and quarantine in Cuba. Journal of the American Medical Association 290: 2875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jiang, Yi-Huah. 1998. Asian values and communitarian democracy. Paper presented at the International Workshop on Deliberating the Asian Value Debate, Taipei. http://homepage.ntu.edu.tw/~jiang/PDF/D3.pdf. Accessed March 14, 2011.
  6. 6.
    Bell, Daniel A. 1995. A communitarian critique of authoritarianism. Society 32: 38–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Communitarian Network. 2010. Responsive communitarian platform. Communitarian Network. http://communitariannetwork.org/about-communitarianism/responsive-communitarian-platform/. Accessed July 20, 2011.
  8. 8.
    Callahan, Daniel. 1994. Bioethics: Private choice and common good. Hastings Center Report 24: 28–31.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Emanuel, Ezekiel. 1987. A communal vision of care for incompetent patients. Hastings Center Report 17: 15–20.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Blustein, Jeffrey. 1993. The family in medical decision making. Hastings Center Report 23: 6–13.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gostin, Lawrence O. 2002. Public health law in an age of terrorism: Rethinking individual rights and common goods. Health Affairs 21: 71–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Das, Veena. 1999. Public good, ethics, and everyday life: Beyond the boundaries of bioethics. Daedalus 128: 99–133.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ogunbanjo, Gboyega A, and van Bogaert Donna Knapp. 2005. Communitarianism and communitarian bioethics. South African Family Practice Journal 47: 51–53.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Murray, Thomas H. 1994. Communities need more than autonomy. Hastings Center Report 24: 32–33.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kuczewski, Mark. 2001. The epistemology of communitarian bioethics: Traditions in the public debate. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 22: 135–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    London, Alex John 2003. Threats to the common good: Biochemical weapons and human subjects research. Hastings Center Report 33: 17–25.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kuczewski, Mark. 2009. The common morality in communitarian thought: Reflective consensus in public policy. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 30: 45–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Etzioni, Amitai. 2004. The common good. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Etzioni, Amitai. 1975. A comparative analysis of complex organizations, Rev ed. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Erin, Charles A, and John Harris. 2003. An ethical market in human organs. Journal of Medical Ethics 29: 137–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Etzioni, Amitai. 1988. The moral dimension: Toward a new economics. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hardwig, John. 1990. What about the family? Hastings Center Report 20: 5–10.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Etzioni, Amitai. 2003. Diversity within unity. In 21st century opportunities and challenges: An age of destruction or an age or transformation, ed. Howard F. Didsbury Jr., 316–323. Bethesda: World Future Society.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jonsen, Albert R. 1998. The birth of bioethics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Etzioni, Amitai. 1999. The limits of privacy. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Beauchamp, Tom L 1994. Reversing the protections. Hastings Center Report 24: 18–19.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Beauchamp, Tom L, and James F. Childress. 2008. Principles of biomedical ethics. 6th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    NPR. 2010. Colorado’s Senator Bennet on his narrow election win. NPR. http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=131181595. Accessed March 1, 2011.
  29. 29.
    Congressional Budget Office. 2010. The budget and economic outlook: Fiscal years 2010 to 2020. Congressional Budget Office. http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/108xx/doc10871/01-26-Outlook.pdf. Accessed March 1, 2011.
  30. 30.
    The National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform. 2010. The moment of truth. http://www.fiscalcommission.gov/sites/fiscalcommission.gov/files/documents/TheMomentofTruth12_1_2010.pdf. Accessed March 1, 2011.
  31. 31.
    Aaron, Henry J. 2003. The costs of health care administration in the US and Canada—A questionable answer to a questionable question. New England Journal of Medicine 349: 801–803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    60 Minutes. 2009. Medicare fraud: A $60 billion crime. CBS News. http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/10/23/60minutes/main5414390.shtml. Accessed March 1, 2011.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.George Washington UniversityWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations