Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics

, Volume 32, Issue 1, pp 61–74 | Cite as

Statistical decisions and the interim analyses of clinical trials

Article

Abstract

This paper analyzes statistical decisions during the interim analyses of clinical trials. After some general remarks about the ethical and scientific demands of clinical trials, I introduce the notion of a hard-case clinical trial, explain the basic idea behind it, and provide a real example involving the interim analyses of zidovudine in asymptomatic HIV-infected patients. The example leads me to propose a decision analytic framework for handling ethical conflicts that might arise during the monitoring of hard-case clinical trials. I use computer simulations to show how the framework can assist in reconciling certain ethical conflicts. The framework is partial, lacking the precision of a complete systematization of statistical monitoring procedures in practice.

Keywords

Evidence Statistical inference Confirmation Bayesian Case study HIV/AIDS 

References

  1. 1.
    Idänpään-Heikkilä, J., and Sev Fluss. 2005. Emerging international norms for clinical testing. In Ethics and the pharmaceutical industry, ed. M.A. Santoro and T.M. Gorrie, 37–47. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Epstein, S. 1996. Impure science–AIDS, activism, and the politics of knowledge. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Petryna, A. 2009. When experiments travel. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hawkins, J.S., and E.J. Emanuel, eds. 2008. Exploitation and developing countries: The ethics of clinical research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cannistra, S.A. 2004. The ethics of early stopping rules: Who is protecting whom? Journal of Clinical Oncology 22: 1542–1545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Buchanan, D., and F. Miller. 2005. Principles of early stopping of randomized trials of efficacy: A critique of equipoise and an alternative nonexploitation ethical framework. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 15: 161–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Merigan, T.C. 1990. You can teach an old dog new tricks: How AIDS trials are pioneering new strategies. New England Journal of Medicine 323(19): 1341–1343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pocock, S. 1993. Statistical and ethical issues in monitoring clinical trials. Statistics in Medicine 12: 1459–1469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Volberding, P.A., S.W. Lagakos, M.A. Koch, et al. 1990. Zidovudine in asymptomatic human immunodeficiency virus infection. New England Journal of Medicine 322: 941–949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Concorde Coordinating Committee. 1994. Corcorde: MRC/ANRS randomised double-blind controlled trail of immediate and deferred zidovudine in symptom-free HIV infection. Lancet 343(8902): 871–881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ellenberg, S. 2003. Are all monitoring boundaries equally ethical? Controlled Clinical Trials 24: 585–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations