Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics

, Volume 29, Issue 3, pp 135–149 | Cite as

What is conscience and why is respect for it so important?

Article

Abstract

The literature on conscience in medicine has paid little attention to what is meant by the word ‘conscience.’ This article distinguishes between retrospective and prospective conscience, distinguishes synderesis from conscience, and argues against intuitionist views of conscience. Conscience is defined as having two interrelated parts: (1) a commitment to morality itself; to acting and choosing morally according to the best of one’s ability, and (2) the activity of judging that an act one has done or about which one is deliberating would violate that commitment. Tolerance is defined as mutual respect for conscience. A set of boundary conditions for justifiable respect for conscientious objection in medicine is proposed.

Keywords

Conscience Medical ethics Tolerance 

References

  1. 1.
    ACOG Committee. 2007. Opinion No. 385, November 2007: the limits of conscientious refusal in reproductive medicine. Obstetrics and Gynecology 110: 1203–1208.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    D’Arcy, Eric. 1961. Conscience and its right to freedom. New York: Sheed and Ward.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Butler, Joseph. 1950. Five sermons preached at the Rolls Chapel and a dissertation upon the nature of virtue. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hunter, J.F.M. 1973. Conscience. In Conscience, ed. John Donnelly and Leonard Lyons, 55–84. New York: Alba House.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Potts, Timothy C. 1980. Conscience in medieval philosophy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Aquinas, Thomas. 1963. Summa theologiae, vol. I–II. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mill, John Stuart. 1975. On liberty. In John Stuart Mill: Three essays, ed. Jack Stillinger, 5–141. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fuss, Peter. 1973. Conscience. In Conscience, ed. John Donnelly and Leonard Lyons, 35–50. New York: Alba House.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shakespeare, William. 1994. Hamlet. New York: Bedford/St. Martin’s.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Aristotle. 1985. Nichomachean ethics. (trans: Terence Irwin). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Callahan, Sidney. 1991. In good conscience: Reason and emotion in moral discourse. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Arendt, Hanna. 1963. Eichmann in Jerusalem. New York: Viking Press.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kilcullen, John. 1988. Bayle on the rights of conscience. In Sincerity and truth: Essays on Arnauld, Bayle and toleration, 54–105. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kolnai, Aurel. 1978. Erroneous conscience. In Ethics, value, and reality: Selected papers of Aurel Kolnai, ed. Bernard Williams and David Wiggins, 1–22. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Donagan, Alan. 1977. The theory of morality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chesterton, G.K. 1995. Orthodoxy. San Francisco: Ignatius Press.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kamm, F.M. 1999. Collaboration and responsibility. Philosophy and Public Affairs 28: 169–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Keenan, James F., and Thomas R. Kopfensteiner. 1995. The principle of cooperation. Health Progress 76: 23–27.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Grisez, Germain. 1997. Difficult moral questions. Quincy, IL: Franciscan Press.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pontifical Academy for Life. 2006. Moral reflections on vaccines prepared from cells derived from aborted fetuses. National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 6: 541–550.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Vinnedge, Debra L. 2005. Aborted fetal cell line vaccines and the Catholic family: A moral and historical perspective, revised version of October, 2005. http://www.cogforlife.org/fetalvaccinetruth.htm#Summary. Accessed 17 April 2008.
  22. 22.
    Starr, Paul. 1982. The social transformation of American medicine. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pellegrino, Edmund D. 1982. The ethics of collective judgments in medicine and health care. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 7: 3–10.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    De George, Michael T. 1982. The moral responsibility of the hospital. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 7: 87–100.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Smith, Michael D. 1982. The virtuous organization. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 7: 35–42.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    French, Peter A. 1982. Collective responsibility and the practice of medicine. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 7: 65–85.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Nairn, Thomas A. 2001. Institutional conscience revisited. New Theology Review 14: 39–49.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Locke, John. 1983. A letter concerning toleration, ed. James H. Tully. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sulmasy, Daniel P. 1997. Institutional conscience and moral pluralism in health care. New Theology Review 10: 5–12.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sulmasy, Daniel P. 2000. On warning families about genetic risk: The ghost of Tarasoff. American Journal of Medicine 109: 738–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The John J. Conley Department of EthicsSt. Vincent’s Hospital—ManhattanNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.New York Medical CollegeValhallaUSA

Personalised recommendations