Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics

, Volume 27, Issue 4, pp 285–304 | Cite as

The Regulation of Animal Research and the Emergence of Animal Ethics: A Conceptual History

Article

Abstract

The history of the regulation of animal research is essentially the history of the emergence of meaningful social ethics for animals in society. Initially, animal ethics concerned itself solely with cruelty, but this was seen as inadequate to late 20th-century concerns about animal use. The new social ethic for animals was quite different, and its conceptual bases are explored in this paper. The Animal Welfare Act of 1966 represented a very minimal and in many ways incoherent attempt to regulate animal research, and is far from morally adequate. The 1985 amendments did much to render coherent the ethic for laboratory animals, but these standards were still inadequate in many ways, as enumerated here. The philosophy underlying these laws is explained, their main provisions are explored, and future directions that could move the ethic forward and further rationalize the laws are sketched.

Keywords

animal ethics animal experimentation animal laws animal research regulation animal research ethics 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgement

I would like to thank David DeGrazia for helpful suggestions in the development of this article.

References

  1. French R. (1975). Antivivisection and Medical Science in Victorian Society. Princeton, Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
  2. Preece R. (2002). Awe for the Tiger, Love for the Lamb: A Chronicle of Sensibility to Animals. New York, RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  3. Preece R. (2005). Brute Souls, Happy Beasts, and Evolution. Vancouver, UBC PressGoogle Scholar
  4. Preece, R. and D. Fraser, eds. Dix Harwood’s Love for Animals and How It Developed in Great Britain. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen, 2002. First published 1928Google Scholar
  5. Rollin B.E. (1995). Farm Animal Welfare. Ames, Iowa, Iowa State University PressGoogle Scholar
  6. Russel W.M.S., and Burch R.L. (1959). The Principles of Human Experimental Technique. London, MethuenGoogle Scholar
  7. Visscher, M.B. Review of Animal Rights and Human Morality by B. E. Rollin. Buffalo: Prometheus, 1981. In New England Journal of Medicine 306 (1982):1303–1304Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyColorado State UniversityFort CollinsUSA

Personalised recommendations