Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics

, Volume 27, Issue 3, pp 227–243 | Cite as

Emerging Medical Technologies and Emerging Conceptions of Health

  • William E. Stempsey
Original Paper


Using ideas gleaned from the philosophy of technology of Martin Heidegger and Hans Jonas and the philosophy of health of Georges Canguilhem, I argue that one of the characteristics of emerging medical technologies is that these technologies lead to new conceptions of health. When technologies enable the body to respond to more and more challenges of disease, we thus establish new norms of health. Given the continued development of successful technologies, we come to expect more and more that our bodies should be able to respond to ever-new challenges of environment and disease by establishing ever-new norms of health. Technologies may aim at the prevention and treatment of disease, but they also bring about modifications of what we consider normal for the human being. Thus, new norms of health arise from technological innovation.


Canguilhem health Heidegger Jonas medical technology technology 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aristotle (1984) Metaphysics. In: Jonathan Barnes (eds) The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Edition. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp. 1552–1728Google Scholar
  2. Boorse, Christopher (1997) A Rebuttal on Health. In: James M. Humber, Robert F. Almeder (eds) What is Disease?. Humana Press, Totowa, N.J., pp 3–134Google Scholar
  3. Canguilhem Georges (1991) The Normal and the Pathological. Zone Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Engelhardt H. Tristram, Jr (1976). Ideology and Etiology. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 1:256–68Google Scholar
  5. Fries J.F. (1980). Aging, Natural Death and the Compression of Morbidity. New England Journal of Medicine 303:130–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Heidegger Martin (1993) The Question Concerning Technology. In: David Farrell Krell (eds) Martin Heidegger, Basic Writings, rev. ed. HarperSanFrancisco, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  7. Hofmann Bjørn (2003) Medicine as Techne—A Perspective from Antiquity. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 28:403–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jonas Hans (1979) Toward a Philosophy of Technology. Hastings Center Report 9(1):34–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jonas Hans (1984) The Imperative of Responsibility: In Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age. Translated by Hans Jonas with the collaboration of David Herr. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  10. Juengst Eric T., Robert H. Binstock, Maxwell Mehlman, Stephen G. Post, Peter Whitehouse (2003) Biogerentology, ‘Anti-Aging Medicine,’ and the Challenges of Human Enhancement. Hastings Center Report 33(4):21–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kamboh, M. Ilyas. Molecular Genetics of Late-Onset Alzheimer’s Disease. Annals of Human Genetics (2004): 381–404Google Scholar
  12. Nordenfelt, Lennart (1995) On the Nature of Health: An Action-Theoretic Approach, 2d revised and enlarged edition. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Boston and LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. Plato (1961) Philebus. In: Edith Hamilton and Huntington Cairns (eds) The Collected Dialogues. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 1086–1150Google Scholar
  14. Thagard Paul (1999). How Scientists Explain Disease. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  15. Trnka Peter (2003) Subjectivity and Values in Medicine: The Case of Canguilhem. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 28:427–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. van’t Hoff, Jacobus Henricus (1967). Springer-Verlag, BerlinGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyCollege of the Holy CrossWorcesterUSA

Personalised recommendations