Vulnerable Populations in Research: The Case of the Seriously Ill
- First Online:
- 291 Downloads
This paper advances a new criterion of a vulnerable population in research. According to this criterion, there are consent-based and fairness-based reasons for calling a group vulnerable. The criterion is then applied to the case of people with serious illnesses. It is argued that people with serious illnesses meet this criterion for reasons related to consent. Seriously ill people have a susceptibility to “enticing offers” that hold out the prospect of removing or alleviating illness, and this susceptibility reduces their ability to safeguard their own interests. This explains the inclusion of people with serious illnesses in the Belmont Report’s list of populations needing special protections, and supports the claim that vulnerability is the rule, rather than the exception, in biomedical research.
Keywordsautonomy Belmont Report biomedical research ethics consent fairness serious illness vulnerable population
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Brody B.A. (1998). Research on the Vulnerable Sick. In: Kahn J.P., Mastroianni A.C., Sugarman J. (eds), Beyond Consent: Seeking Justice in Research. New York, Oxford University Press, pp. 32–46Google Scholar
- Eckstein Sue. (2003). Research Involving Vulnerable Participants: Some Ethical Issues. In: Eckstein Sue (eds), Manual for Research Ethics Committees 6th ed. Cambridge, England, Cambridge University Press, pp. 105–109Google Scholar
- Englehardt H.T. Jr. (1984). Clinical Problems and the Concept of Disease. In: Nordenfelt L., Lindahl B., Ingemar B. (eds), Health, Disease, and Causal Explanation in Medicine. Philosophy and Medicine series vol 16. Dordrecht, D. Reidel, pp. 27–41Google Scholar
- Jennings, Bruce; Callahan, Daniel; and Caplan, Arthur. “Ethical Challenges of Chronic Illness.” Hastings Center Report 18, (1) (1988): Special Supplement 1–16Google Scholar
- Kipnis, Kenneth. “Vulnerability in Research Subjects: A Bioethical Taxonomy.” In Ethical and Policy Issues in Research Involving Human Research Participants. Bethesda, MD: National Bioethics Advisory Commision, 2001: G1–G12Google Scholar
- Levine C., Faden R., Grady C., Hammerschmidt D., Eckenwiler L., Sugarman J. (2004). The Limitations of ’Vulnerability’ as a Protection for Human Research Participants. American Journal of Bioethics 4:44–49Google Scholar
- Levine C., Faden R., Grady C., Hammerschmidt D., Eckenwiler L., Sugarman J. (2004). Special Scrutiny: A Targeted Form of Research Protocol Review. Annals of Internal Medicine 140:220–223Google Scholar
- Macintyre A. (1999). Dependent Rational Animals: Why Human Beings Need the Virtues. Chicago and La, Salle Illinois, Open CourtGoogle Scholar
- Mele A.R. (2001) Autonomous Agents: From Self-Control to Autonomy. New York, Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
- National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. The Belmont Report . Available at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Website, <http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/belmont.htm> Original report published1979.
- Nordenfelt L. (1987) On the Nature of Health: An Action-Theoretic Approach Philosophy and Medicine series, vol 26. Dordrecht, D. ReidelGoogle Scholar
- Ratzan R.M. (2000). ‘Being Old Makes You Different’: The Ethics of Research with Elderly Subjects. In: Boetzkes E., Waluchow W.J. (eds), Readings in Health Care Ethics. New York, USA, Broadview Press, pp. 454–468Google Scholar
- Rawls J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, Mass, Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
- Rawls J. (1999). Collected Papers. Cambridge, Mass, Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
- Rawls J. (2001). Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. Cambridge Mass, Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
- Raz J. (1986). The Morality of Freedom. New York, Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
- Schneider C. (1998). The Practice of Autonomy. New York, Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
- Shamoo A.E., Resnik D. (2003). Responsible Conduct of Research. New York, Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
- Thomson J.J. (1990). The Realm of Rights. Cambridge, Mass, Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
- U.S. Code of Federal Regulations. Title 45, Part 46. Available at <http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.htm>.
- World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki. October 2000. Available at <http://www.wma.net/e/policy/b3.htm>.