Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics

, Volume 25, Issue 4, pp 265–276

Child Welfare Versus Parental Autonomy: Medical Ethics, The Law, and Faith-Based Healing

  • Kenneth Hickey
  • Laurie Lyckholm

DOI: 10.1007/s11017-004-3137-7

Cite this article as:
Hickey, K. & Lyckholm, L. Theor Med Bioeth (2004) 25: 265. doi:10.1007/s11017-004-3137-7


Over the past three decades more than 200 children have died in the U.S. of treatable illnesses as a result of their parents relying on spiritual healing rather than conventional medical treatment. Thirty-nine states have laws that protect parents from criminal prosecution when their children die as a result of not receiving medical care. As physicians and citizens, we must choose between protecting the welfare of children and maintaining respect for the rights of parents to practice the religion of their choice and to make important decisions for their children. In order to make and defend such choices, it is essential that we as health care professionals understand the history and background of such practices and the legal aspects of previous cases, as well as formulate an ethical construct by which to begin a dialogue with the religious communities and others who share similar beliefs about spiritual healing. In this paper, we provide a framework for these requirements.

Christian Science faith healing religion and ethics 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kenneth Hickey
    • 1
  • Laurie Lyckholm
    • 2
  1. 1.Chief Resident Department of Emergency MedicineVirginia Commonwealth Medical CenterVirginia
  2. 2.Associate Professor of Internal Medicine Division of Hematology/OncologyVirginia Commonwealth University Medical CenterVirginia

Personalised recommendations