Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Undecidability and interpretation: metatheoretic distinctions in Western philosophy

William Boos: Metamathematics and the philosophical tradition (edited by Florence S. Boos). Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter GmbH, 2018, xii+492pp. USD$124.99 HB and e-book

  • 5 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Atanassov, Krassimir T. 2017. Intuitionistic Fuzzy Logics. Cham: Springer.

  2. Franklin, James. 2009. What Science Knows: And How It Knows It. New York: Encounter Books.

  3. Franklin, James. 2014. An Aristotelian Realist Philosophy of Mathematics: Mathematics as the Science of Quantity and Structure. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

  4. Haldane, John. 2008. Seeking Meaning and Making Sense. Exeter: Imprint Academic.

  5. Jaki, S.L. 1974. From Eternal Cycles to an Oscillating Universe. New York, Edinburgh: Science History Publications, Scottish Academic Press.

  6. Shannon, A.G. 2016. Intuitionistic Fuzzy Logic and Provisional Acceptance of Scientific Theories. In Imprecision and Uncertainty in Information Representation and Processing: Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing 332, ed. P. Angelov and S. Sotirov, 15–23. Berlin: Springer.

  7. White, Jeremy Joyner. 1998. A Humean Critique of David Hume’s Theory of Knowledge. Ed. John A. Gueguen. New York: University Press of America.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Anthony G. Shannon.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shannon, A.G. Undecidability and interpretation: metatheoretic distinctions in Western philosophy. Metascience (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11016-019-00476-0

Download citation