Advertisement

Metascience

, Volume 28, Issue 3, pp 523–526 | Cite as

A review of actor-network theory and crime studies

D. Robert and M. Dufresne: Actor-network theory and crime studies: Explorations in science and technology. Oxon, UK and New York, USA: Routledge, 2106, 145pp, US$84.67 HB
  • Stacey L. ClouseEmail author
Book Review
  • 66 Downloads

Actor-Network Theory and Crime Studies: Explorations in Science and Technology is comprised of nine scholarly articles utilizing actor-network theory (ANT) to expand upon research in the field of criminal justice. The anthology is clustered into three sections: a relational approach to actors in a network, interaction between the human and non-human, and the production of crime facts and science (Robert and Dufresne 2016a, b); each applying various methodological approaches while grounded in several theories, in addition to ANT. The sections merge concepts of crime with ANT to explain how the developed network between entities is where the actual power lies.

The first section of the reader focuses on the power of relational beings to demonstrate the relationship between the human and non-human. As such, Douillet and Dumoulin’s (2015) research on CCTV development attempts to understand the spread of CCTVs through an actor network perspective by examining public policy coupled with...

Notes

References

  1. Coleman, R., and M. McCahill. 2011. Surveillance and crime: Key approaches to crime (1 edn). Los Angeles: SAGE.Google Scholar
  2. Deleuze, G. 1992. Postscript on the Societies of Control. October 59: 3–7.Google Scholar
  3. Demant, J., and E. Dilkes-Frayne. 2015. Situational crime prevention in nightlife spaces: An ANT examination of PAD dogs and doorwork. In Actor-network theory and crime studies: Explorations in science and technology (pp. 5–19). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Douillet, A. C., and L. Dumoulin. 2015. Actor network theory and CCTV development. In Actor-network theory and crime studies: Explorations in science and technology (pp. 21–36).Google Scholar
  5. Dubrofsky, R.E., and S.A. Magnet (Eds.). 2015. Feminist surveillance studies. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Dufresne, M. 2016. How does a gene in a scientific journal affect my future behavior? In Actor-network theory and crime studies: Explorations in science and technology (p. 37).Google Scholar
  7. Foucault, M. 1977. Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. trans. Alan Sheridan.Google Scholar
  8. Lam, A. 2016. Making crime messy. In Actor-network theory and crime studies (pp. 65–79). Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Latour, B. 2009. Sur le culte modern des dieux factiches: Suivi de Iconoclash. Paris: La Decouverte.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lyon, D. 2010. Liquid surveillance: The contribution of Zygmunt Bauman to surveillance studies. International Political Sociology 4(4): 325–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Magnet, S. 2011. When biometrics fail: Gender, race, and the technology of identity. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mol, A. 2002. The body multiple: Ontology in medical practice. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Moore, D., and R. Singh. 2015. Seeing crime: ANT, feminism and images of violence against women. In Actor-network theory and crime studies: Explorations in science and technology (pp. 67–80).Google Scholar
  14. Mopas, M. 2015. Translating critical scholarship out of the academy: ANT, deconstruction and public criminology. In Actor-network theory and crime studies (pp. 81–98). Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Nelkin, D., and L. Andrews. 1999. DNA identification and surveillance creep. Sociology of Health & Illness 21(5): 689–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Renard, B. 2016. The relevance of actor-network theory (ANT) for research on the use of genetic analysis for identification in criminal justice. In Actor-network theory and crime studies (pp. 127–140). Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Robert, D., and M. Dufresne. 2016a. Can electricity soothe the savage breast? What tasers do to the police use of force. In Actor-network theory and crime studies (pp. 113–126). Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Robert, D., and M. Dufresne. 2016b. The factishes of DNA identification: How a scientist speaks about his craft to politicians. In Actor-network theory and crime studies (pp. 141–156). Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Roberts, D.E. 2009. Race, gender, and genetic technologies: A new reproductive dystopia? Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 34(4): 783–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sekula, A. 1986. The body and the archive. October 39: 3–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Nevada, Las VegasLas VegasUSA

Personalised recommendations