Science and religion at war about war
- 65 Downloads
For a while, Michael Ruse has been offering a controversial answer to the question: Why is Darwinism so contentious? He replies, “The simple answer is that it goes against religion; in particular, it goes against the Christian religion” (212). This is debatable, because in recent decades, most historians of science have been stressing the many lines of accommodation between Darwinism and Christianity. Ruse, however, focuses in this work on the disagreements between Darwinists and Christians and overlooks and ignores many attempts that have been made to harmonize them.
Why are Darwinism and Christianity locked in combat? Here, Ruse becomes even more controversial, because even though he believes that Darwinian evolution is valid scientifically, he states, “I argue that there is a side to Darwinian thinking, what I refer to as Darwinism, that functions as a religion, or if you prefer, a secular religious perspective” (213).
Ruse chooses an interesting case study to test his...
- Darwin, Charles. 1981. The Descent of Man. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Gasman, Daniel. 1971. The Scientific Origins of National Socialism: Social Darwinism in Ernst Haeckel and the German Monist League. London: MacDonald.Google Scholar
- Gasman, Daniel. 1998. Haeckel’s Monism and the Birth of Fascist Ideology. NY: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
- Koch, H.W. 1972. Social Darwinism as a Factor in the ‘New Imperialism’. In The Origins of the First World War: Great Power Rivalry and German War Aims, ed. H.W. Koch. NY: Taplinger.Google Scholar
- Stepan, Nancy. 1987. Nature’s Pruning Hook: War, Race and Evolution, 1914–1918. In The Political Culture of Modern Britain, ed. J.M.W. Bean. London: Hamish Hamilton.Google Scholar
- Wilson, E.O., and Michael Ruse. 1985. The Evolution of Ethics. New Scientist 108: 50–52.Google Scholar