Advertisement

Metascience

pp 1–5 | Cite as

Epistolary practices in the Enlightenment

Roderick W. Home, Isabel M. Malaquias, and Manuel F. Thomaz (Eds.): For the love of science. The Correspondence of J. H. de Magellan (1722–1790). Bern: Peter Lang, 2017, 2 vols. 2002 pp. continuously paginated, US$184 HB
  • Robert Fox
Review Essay
  • 7 Downloads

In their illuminating introduction to this edition of the correspondence of Jean Hyacinthe de Magellan, the editors situate the letters to and from Magellan in a period of the history of science, centred on the last quarter of the eighteenth century, in which the volume and pace of scientific communication changed radically. From an age in which information had moved in a rather leisurely manner among an elite of academicians and the loftier citizens of the Republic of Letters, science had passed, by the early nineteenth century, to one in which a now far larger community prized dissemination that was at once more rapid and more public. The new age found its voice in a remarkable generation of pioneering journals, exemplified in the German-speaking world by Lorenz von Crell’s Chemische Annalen, first published in 1778, in Britain by William Nicholson’s Journal of natural philosophy, chemistry and the arts, launched in 1797, and in France by a succession of new periodicals from...

References

  1. Banks, Joseph. 2002. Scientific correspondence of Joseph Banks 17651820. Ed. Neil Chambers, 6 vols. London: Pickering & Chatto.Google Scholar
  2. Black, Joseph. 2012. The correspondence of Joseph Black. Ed. Robert G. W. Anderson and Jean Jones. Farnham and Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  3. Darwin, Erasmus. 2007. The collected letters of Erasmus Darwin. Ed. Desmond King-Hele. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.Google Scholar
  4. Hunter, Michael. 2016. Editing early modern scientific correspondence: the way forward. Isis 107: 365–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Laplace, Pierre Simon. 2013. Correspondance de Pierre Simon Laplace (17491827). Ed. Roger Hahn, 2 vols. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
  6. Lavoisier. Antoine Laurent 1955–2012. Oeuvres de Lavoisier. Correspondance. Ed. René Fric, Michelle Goupil, and Patrice Bret, 7 vols. Paris: successively Albin Michel, Belin, Académie des Sciences, Blanchard, Hermann.Google Scholar
  7. Levere, T. H., and G. L’E. Turner, with contributions from Jan Golinski and Larry Stewart. 2002. Discussing chemistry and steam. The minutes of a coffee house philosophical society 17801787. Oxford: Oxford UP.Google Scholar
  8. O’Brien, Patrick. 2001. Reflections and mediations on Antwerp, Amsterdam and London in their golden ages. In O’Brien (ed.), Urban achievement in early modern Europe. Golden ages in Antwerp, Amsterdam and London. Cambridge: Cambridge UP: 3-35.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Museum of the History of ScienceOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations