, Volume 22, Issue 2, pp 457–460 | Cite as

History and philosophy of science: coherent programme at last?

Seymour Mauskopf and Tad Schmaltz (eds.): Integrating history and philosophy of science: Problems and prospects. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 263. Heidelberg: Springer, 249pp, €99.95
  • Samuel Schindler
Book Review

About 40 years ago, Giere (1973), in a much noted review, criticized the attempt to combine philosophical with historical methods in the study of science as being ‘without a conceptually coherent programme’. In particular, Giere found it difficult to see how a largely descriptive approach (history) could meaningfully inform a largely normative approach (philosophy) without committing the notorious naturalistic fallacy. Since then much ink has been spilled over the question of how the relationship between history of science (HoS) and philosophy of science (PoS) could (and should) most reasonably be construed (see Schickore 2011for a comprehensive overview). The present volume constitutes the latest concerted effort in this endeavour. It is one of the strengths of this collection that, contrary to much other work on the topic, it really does try, consistently throughout all of its contributions, to elucidate the HoS–PoS relationship in one way or another. Whereas some contributions...


  1. Chang, H. 2004. Inventing temperature: Measurement and scientific progress. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Franklin, A., M. Anderson, D. Brock, et al. 1989. Can a theory-laden observation test the theory? The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 40(2): 229–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Giere, R.N. 1973. History and philosophy of science: Marriage of convenience or intimate relationship. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 24: 282–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Giere, R.N. 1985. Philosophy of science naturalized. Philosophy of Science 52: 331–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Laudan, L. 1977. Progress and Its Problems: Towards a Theory of Scientific Growth. Routledge: K. Paul.Google Scholar
  6. Laudan, L. 1986. Methodology's prospects.Google Scholar
  7. Pickering, A. 1984. Against putting the phenomena first: The discovery of the weak neutral current. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 15(2): 85–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Pitt, J.C. 2001. The dilemma of case studies: Toward a Heraclitian philosophy of science. Perspectives on Science 9(4): 373–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Schickore, J. 2011. More thoughts on HPS: Another 20 years later. Perspectives on Science 19(4):453–481.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Science Studies, Department of Physics and AstronomyAarhus UniversityAarhusDenmark

Personalised recommendations