Metascience

, Volume 21, Issue 1, pp 1–10

Assessing the influence of Kuhn’s Structure of Scientific Revolutions

Essay Review

References

  1. Andersen, H., P. Barker, and X. Chen. 2006. The cognitive structure of scientific revolutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Balashov, Y., and A. Rosenberg eds. 2002. Philosophy of science: Contemporary readings. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Barker, P. 2001. Kuhn, incommensurability, and cognitive science. Perspectives on Science 9(4): 433–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bird, A.J. 2002. Kuhn’s wrong turn. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 33: 443–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bird, A. 2000. Thomas Kuhn. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, H. 2005. Incommensurability reconsidered. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 36(1): 149–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown, H.I. 1983. Incommensurability. Inquiry 26(1): 3–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Buchwald, J.Z., and G.E. Smith. 1997. Thomas S. Kuhn, 1922–1996. Philosophy of Science 64(2): 361–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cedarbaum, D.G. 1983. Paradigms. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 14(3): 173–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Curd, M., and J.A. Cover eds. 1998. Philosophy of science: The central issues. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar
  11. D’Agostino, F. 2005. Kuhn’s risk-spreading argument and the organization of scientific communities. Episteme 3: 201–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. De Oliveira, J.C.P. 2007. Carnap, Kuhn, and revisionism: On the publication of structure in encyclopedia. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 38: 147–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Farmakis, L. 2008. Did Tom Kuhn actually meet Tom Bayes? Erkenntnis 68: 41–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Friedman, M. 1993. Remarks on the history of science and the history of philosophy. In World changes: Thomas Kuhn and the nature of science, ed. P. Horwich, 37–54. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  15. Fuller, S. 2000. Thomas Kuhn: A philosophical history for our times. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  16. Godfrey-Smith, P. 2003. Theory and reality: An introduction to the philosophy of science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  17. Hesse, M. 1963. Review of The structure of scientific revolutions by Thomas S Kuhn. Isis 54(2): 286–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hoyningen-Huene, P. 2008. Thomas Kuhn and the chemical revolution. Foundations of Chemistry 10: 101–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hoyningen-Huene, P. 2006. More letters by Paul Feyerabend to Thomas S. Kuhn on proto-structure. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 37: 610–632.Google Scholar
  20. Hoyningen-Huene, P., and H. Sankey eds. 2001. Incommensurability and related matters. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  21. Irzik, G., and T. Grünberg. 1995. Carnap and Kuhn: Arch-enemies of close allies? British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 46: 285–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kindi, V. 2005. The relation of history of science to philosophy of science in The structure of scientific revolutions and Kuhn’s later philosophical work. Perspectives on Science 13(4): 495–530.Google Scholar
  23. Kourany, J.A. ed. 1998. Scientific knowledge: Basic issues in the philosophy of science, 2nd ed. Belmont CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  24. Kuhn, T. S. 2000. The road since structure: philosophical essays, 19701993, with an autobiographical interview, eds. J. Conant and J. Haugeland. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  25. Kuhn, T.S. 1987. Black-body theory and the quantum discontinuity, 1894–1912. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  26. Lakatos, I., and A. Musgrave eds. 1970. Criticism and the growth of knowledge: Proceedings of the international colloquium in the philosophy of science, London, 1965, Vol. 4, reprinted with corrections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Lange, M. ed. 2007. Philosophy of science: An anthology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  28. Laudan, L. 1984. Science and values: The aims of science and their role in scientific debate. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  29. Marx, W., and L. Bornmann. 2010. How accurately does Thomas Kuhn’s model of paradigm change describe the transition from the static view of the universe to the Big Bang theory in cosmology? Scientometrics 84(2): 441–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Masterman, M. 1970. The nature of a paradigm, in Lakatos and Musgrave (1970), pp. 59–89.Google Scholar
  31. Mayr, E. 2004. Do Thomas Kuhn’s scientific revolutions take place?. In What makes biology unique?: Considerations on the autonomy of a scientific discipline, 159–169. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  32. McGrew, T., M. Alspector-Kelly, and F. Allhoff. 2009. Philosophy of science: An historical anthology. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  33. Newton-Smith, W.H. ed. 2000. A companion to the philosophy of science. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  34. Nickles, T. ed. 2003. Thomas Kuhn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Oberheim, E. 2005. On the historical origins of the contemporary notion of incommensurability: Paul Feyerabend’s assault on conceptual conservativism. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 36(2): 363–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Preston, J. 2004. Bird, Kuhn, and positivism. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 35: 327–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Psillos, S., and M. Curd. 2008. Routledge companion to philosophy of science. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  38. Reisch, G.A. 2005. How the cold war transformed philosophy of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Reisch, G.A. 1991. Did Kuhn kill logical empiricism? Philosophy of Science 58(2): 264–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rothbart, D. 1998. Science, reason, and reality: Issues in the philosophy of science. Forth Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.Google Scholar
  41. Richardson, A. 2007. The sort of everyday image of logical positivism: Thomas Kuhn and the decline of logical empiricist philosophy of science. In The Cambridge companion to logical empiricism, ed. A. Richardson, and T. Uebel, 346–369. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Sankey, H. 1993. Kuhn’s changing conception of incommensurability. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 44(4): 759–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sankey, H. 1991. Incommensurability, translation, and understanding. Philosophical Quarterly 41(165): 414–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Shapere, D. 1964/1980. Review of The structure of scientific revolutions. In Paradigms and revolutions: Applications and appraisals of Thomas Kuhn’s philosophy of science, ed. G. Gutting. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  45. Torres, J.M. 2010. On Kuhn’s philosophy and its legacy. Lisbon: Cadernos de Filosofia das Ciências.Google Scholar
  46. Wray, K.B. 2011. Kuhn’s evolutionary social epistemology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyState University of New York, OswegoOswegoUSA

Personalised recommendations