Advertisement

Metascience

, Volume 21, Issue 2, pp 253–267 | Cite as

If I could talk to the animals

Gregory Radick: The simian tongue: The long debate about animal language. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2007, 578pp, $45.00 HB
  • Thomas Suddendorf
  • Mark E. Borrello
  • Colin Allen
  • Gregory Radick
Book Symposium
  • 206 Downloads

Thomas Suddendorf

The language faculty, or better the apparent lack of anything quite like human language in other animals, is one of the most prominent phenomenon that Darwin’s theory of evolution has struggled to explain. Ever since Max Müller’s arguments for the language barrier in the 1860s, there have been heated debates about how natural selection could have produced human language, despite the famous attempt of the Société de Linguistique de Paris to ban such discussion in 1866. Darwin’s (1859) bold claim that each human psychological faculty was acquired by gradation seemed to imply that there should be closely related animals with some capacities that could be identified as language precursors. Indeed, Darwin himself wrote in a letter to Gray about Müller that: “I wish someone would keep a lot of the most noisy monkeys, half free and study the means of communication” (see Radick, 31). Little in fact was known about primate communication, and thus it was possible that the...

References

  1. Allen, C., and M. Bekoff. 1999. Species of mind: The philosophy and biology of cognitive ethology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  2. Blakemore, C. 1988. The mind machine. London: BBC Books.Google Scholar
  3. Cheney, D.L., and R.M. Seyfarth. 1990. How monkeys see the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  4. Corballis, M.C. 2003. From hand to mouth: The origins of language. New York: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Darwin, C. 1859. On the origin of species. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Darwin, C. 1871. The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. 2 vols. London: John Murray. Single-volume facsimile reprint by Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1981.Google Scholar
  7. Hacking, I. 2009. Scientific reason. Taipei: NTU Press.Google Scholar
  8. Herrmann, E., J. Call, M.V. Hernandez-Lloreda, B. Hare, and M. Tomasello. 2007. Humans have evolved specialized skills of social cognition: The cultural intelligence hypothesis. Science 317: 1360–1366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hewes, G. 1996. A history of the study of language origins and the gestural primacy hypothesis. In Handbook of human symbolic evolution, ed. A. Lock, and C.R. Peters, 571–595. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  10. Kafka, F. 1917. Ein Bericht fur eine Akademie. Der Jude 2: 559–565.Google Scholar
  11. Lofting, H. 1920. The story of Doctor Dolittle. New York: Stokes.Google Scholar
  12. Penn, D.C., K.J. Holyoak, and D.J. Povinelli. 2008. Darwin’s mistake: Explaining the discontinuity between human and nonhuman minds. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31: 109–178.Google Scholar
  13. Premack, D. 2007. Human and animal cognition: Continuity and discontinuity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104: 13861–13867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Suddendorf, T. 2008. Explaining human cognitive autapomorphies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31: 147–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Suddendorf, T., and M.C. Corballis. 2007. The evolution of foresight: What is mental time travel and is it unique to humans? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30: 299–313.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas Suddendorf
    • 1
  • Mark E. Borrello
    • 2
  • Colin Allen
    • 3
  • Gregory Radick
    • 4
  1. 1.School of Psychology, University of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia
  2. 2.Program in the History of Science, Technology and Medicine, Department of Ecology Evolution and BehaviorUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA
  3. 3.Department of History and Philosophy of ScienceCollege of Arts and Sciences, Indiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA
  4. 4.Centre for History and Philosophy of Science, Department of PhilosophyUniversity of LeedsLeedsUK

Personalised recommendations