Metascience

, Volume 21, Issue 1, pp 41–57 | Cite as

Historiography in a metaphysical mode

John G. McEvoy: The historiography of the chemical revolution: Patterns of interpretation in the history of science. London: Pickering and Chatto, 2010, xiii+328pp, £60.00, $99.00 HB
  • Bernadette Bensaude-Vincent
  • Jan Golinski
  • Lissa L. Roberts
  • John McEvoy
Book Symposium
  • 131 Downloads

References

  1. Bloor, D. 1981. The strengths of the strong programme. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 11: 199–213.Google Scholar
  2. Chang, H. 2009. We have never been Whiggish (about phlogiston). Centaurus 51: 239–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Clow, A., and N. Clow. 1952. The chemical revolution: A contribution to social technology. London: Butchwork Press.Google Scholar
  4. Foucault, M. 1973. The order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences (trans. A. Sheridan Smith). New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  5. Gillispie, C.C. 1959. The Encyclopedie and the Jacobin philosophy of science: A study in ideas and consequences. In Critical problems in the history of science, ed. Marshall Clagett, 255–288. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  6. Guerlac, H. 1959. Some French antecedents of the chemical revolution. Chymia 5: 73–113.Google Scholar
  7. Klein, U., and W. Lefèvre. 2007. Materials in eighteenth-century science: A historical ontology. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  8. Lakatos, I. 1970. History of science and its rational reconstructions. PSA: Proceedings of the biennial meeting of the philosophy of science association. Boston studies in the philosophy of science VIII: 91–136.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bernadette Bensaude-Vincent
    • 1
  • Jan Golinski
    • 2
  • Lissa L. Roberts
    • 3
  • John McEvoy
    • 4
  1. 1.CETCOPRA/Université Paris 1-Panthéon-SorbonneParis Cedex05France
  2. 2.Department of HistoryUniversity of New HampshireDurhamUSA
  3. 3.Department of Science, Technology and Policy Studies (STePS)University of TwenteEnschedeThe Netherlands
  4. 4.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of CincinnatiCincinnatiUSA

Personalised recommendations