Advertisement

Metascience

, Volume 17, Issue 2, pp 215–224 | Cite as

What is Cartographic Rationality?

  • David Turnbull
Survey Review

Keywords

Cultural Trait Correspondence Theory Early Modern Period Theoretical Science Cadastral Mapping 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Berry, M.E. Japan In Print: Information and Nation in the Early Modern Period (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2006)Google Scholar
  2. Bono J. Perception, Living Mater, Cognitive Systems, Immune Networks: A Whiteheadian Future for Science Studies, Configurations 13 (2005), pp. 135–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Craib R. Cartographic Mexico: A History of State Fixation and Fugitive Landscapes (Durham: Duke University Press, 2004)Google Scholar
  4. Doel M. The Obscenity of Mapping. Area 38 (2006), 343–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Farinelli F. Did Anaximander ever Say (or Write) and Words? The Nature of Cartographical Reason. Ethics, Place and Environment 1 (1998), 135–144Google Scholar
  6. Kivelson V. Cartographies of Tsardom: The Land and Its Meanings in Seventeenth-Century Russia (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2006)Google Scholar
  7. Latour B. Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1999)Google Scholar
  8. Law, J. and Anne Marie Mol. “Situating Technoscience: An Inquiry into Spatialities”, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 19 (2001), pp.␣609–621Google Scholar
  9. Lee Irwin (1994) cited in R. Feinberg, Ute J. Dymon, Pu Paiaki, Pu Rangituteki, Pu Nukuriaki, and M. Rollins. “‹Drawing the Coral Heads’: Mental Mapping and its Physical Representation in a Polynesian Community”, The Cartographic Journal 40 (2003), pp. 243–254 (at p. 249)Google Scholar
  10. Massey D. 2003. Imagining the Field, in M. Pryke G. Rose and S. Whatmore (eds), Using Social Theory: Thinking Through Social Research, (London: Sage) pp. 71–88Google Scholar
  11. Ong W. Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word (London: Methuen, 1982)Google Scholar
  12. Olson D. The World on Paper: The Conceptual and Cognitive Implications of Writing and Reading (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994)Google Scholar
  13. Pandya V. Movement and Space: Andamanese Cartography, American Ethnologist, 17 (1990), pp. 775–797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Painter J. Cartophilias and Cartoneuroses, Area, 38 (2006) pp. 345–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Pickles, J. A History of Spaces: Cartographic Reason, Mapping and the Geo-coded World (London: Routledge, 2004)Google Scholar
  16. Pickles, John. On the Social Lives of Maps and the Politics of Diagrams: A story of power, seduction, and disappearance, Area 38 (2006), pp. 347–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rundstrom R.A. A Cultural Interpretation of Inuit Map Accuracy, Geographical Review, 80 (1990), pp. 155–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sparke, M. In the Space of Theory: Postfoundational Geographies of the Nation-State (Minneapolis: University of Minneapolis Press, 2005)Google Scholar
  19. Stengers I. Power and Invention: Situating Science (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1997)Google Scholar
  20. Wassman, J. “The Yupno as Post-Newtonian Scientists: The Question of What is ‹Natural’ in Spatial Description”, 29 (1994) Man (new series), pp. 645–666Google Scholar
  21. Winichakul T. Siam Mapped: A History of the Geo-Body of a Nation (Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 1994)Google Scholar
  22. Wood D. The Power of Maps (New York: The Guilford Press, 1992)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Turnbull
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Australian Centre for Science, Innovation and SocietyUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.Centre for Australian Indigenous StudiesMonash UniversityMelbourneAustralia
  3. 3.Centre for Science StudiesLancaster UniversityLancasterUK
  4. 4.Arts FacultyDeakin UniversityGeelongAustralia

Personalised recommendations