Advertisement

Metallurgist

, Volume 63, Issue 5–6, pp 511–520 | Cite as

Advances in Materials Science and Engineering: Prediction of AISI 304 Stainless Steel Pipe Deformation by FEM Simulation

  • A. Di SchinoEmail author
Article
  • 7 Downloads

The high quality standards required for metal forming call for compliance tests aimed to guarantee that such standards are met. Such tests often imply a waste of time and of economic resources. In particular, when stainless steel pipe forming is considered, many factors need to be taken into account. This paper analyzes the effect of different process parameters and geometrical constrains on the cold forming of austenitic stainless steel pipes by the finite element method (FEM). The results of such analysis will allow one to map the effect of different parameters.

Keywords

pipe bending ultimate strain austenitic stainless steels stress distribution bend angle 

References

  1. 1.
    P. P. Marshall, Austenitic Stainless Steels, Springer, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. Di Schino, J. M. Kenny, and G. Abbruzzese, J. Mater. Sci.,37, 5291–5298 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    G. Bregliozzi, S. I. Ahmed, A. Di Schino, J. M. Kenny, and H. Haefke, Tribol. Lett., 17, 697–704 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. Di Schino and P. Di Nunzio, Mater. Lett.,186, 86–89 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. Di Schino, M. Longobardo, G. Porcu, G. L. Turconi, and L. Scoppio, NACE-International Corrosion Conference Series, 061251–061254 (2006). Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. Di Schino, L. Alleva, and M. Guagnelli, Mater. Sci. Forum, 558–559, 1435–1441 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. Di Schino and P. Di Nunzio, Metallurgica Slovaca, 23, 62–71 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    M. Corradi, A. Di Schino, A. Borri, and R. Rufini, Construct. Build. Mater., 181, 335–346 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. Di Schino, Acta Metallurgica Slovaca,22, 266–270 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. Di Schino and C. Guarnaschelli, Mater. Sci. Forum, 638–642, 3188–3193 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    K. H. Lo, C. H. Shek, and K. L. Lai, Mater. Sci. Eng. R,65, 39–104 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    L. Gardner, Prog. Struct. Eng. Mater., 7(4), 5–52 (2005).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    H. J. Bong, F. Barlat, M. Lee, and G. Ahn, Int. J. Mech. Sci.,64(1), 1–10 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    A. Di Schino, L. Valentini, J. M. Kenny, Y. Gerbig, I. Ahmed, and H. Haefke, Surface and Coatings Technology, 161, 224–231 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    H. Zhang and Y. Liu, J. Mater. Res., 32(12), 2343–2351 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    M. Zhan, M. Guo, and H. Yang, Chin. J. Aeronaut., 29(2), 305–315 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    R. Rufini, O. Di Pietro, and A. Di Schino, Metals, 8, 519–532 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    N. C. Tang, Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping, 77(12), 751–759 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EngineeringUniversity of PerugiaPerugiaItaly

Personalised recommendations