Simulation of Roller-Type Cold Rolling of Tubes

  • G. A. OrlovEmail author
  • A. G. Orlov

Outline algorithms for the calculation of forces, prediction of tube failure, changes in wall thickness variation, and check of the process constraints in roller-type cold rolling of tubes are presented. Roller-type cold rolling was simulated to predict the accuracy of rolling and to improve the rolling schedules. Changes in the wall thickness variation were simulated by the finite-element method. The accuracy of the simulation was evaluated: the calculated forces are different from the observed ones by no more than 15%, which validates the algorithms developed. The rolling schedules are analyzed using a previously developed software. The proposed schedules can be used to produce tubes from corrosion-resistant steel.


roller-type cold rolling tube accuracy finite-element method process constraints 


  1. 1.
    M. Harada, A. Honda, and S. Toyoshima, “Simulation of cold pilgering process by a generalized plane strain FEM,” J. ASTM Int., 2, No. 3, 233–247 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    G. A. Orlov and A. R. Izmailov, “Design and analysis of schedules of cold periodic rolling of tubes,” Izv. VUZov, Chern. Metallurg., No. 1, 34–37 (1998).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. V. Ivanov and A. V. Cherednichenko, “Modeling and numerical analysis of cold rolling of pipes on pilger mills,” Nauka i Obrazovanie, MGTU im. Baumana, No. 8, 9–29 (2014).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    G. A. Orlov, “Analysis of passes in rolling tubes in rollers,” Izv. VUZov, Chern. Metallurg., No. 12, 22–24 (1996).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    G. A. Orlov, Basic Theory of Tube Rolling and Drawing [in Russian], Izd. Ural. Univ., Ekaterinburg (2016).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    V. A. Verderevskii, Roller-type Cold Rolling Mills [in Russian], Metallurgiya, Moscow (1992).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    G. A. Orlov and A. R. Izmailov, Expert System-Assisted Automated Cold Pilgering Design, Software Registration Certificate No. 20011610720 (Russia) of 6/14/2001, Rospatent, Moscow (2001).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. A. Bogatov, O. I. Mizhiritskii, and S. V. Smirnov, Plasticity Margin in Metal Forming [in Russian], Metallurgy, Moscow (1984).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. I. Tselikov, Theory of Calculation of Forces in Rolling Mills [in Russian], Metallurgizdat, Moscow (1962).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    S. Kobayashi, S.-I. Oh, and T. Altan, Metal Forming and the Finite-Element Method, Oxford University Press, New York (1989).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    V. L. Kolmogorov, Stress, Strain, and Fracture [in Russian], Metallurgiya, Moscow (1970).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    G. A. Orlov and E. N. Vagapov, “The use of modeling to develop a method for the roller drawing of tubes on a long mandrel,” Metallurgist, 56, No. 1-2, 109–114 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    F. S. Novik and Ya. B. Arsov, Experimental Design Optimization of Metallurgical Processes, Mashinostroenie [in Russian], Moscow, Tekhnika, Sofia (1980).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B. N. YeltsinYekaterinburgRussia

Personalised recommendations