Metallurgist

, Volume 56, Issue 3–4, pp 196–204 | Cite as

Effect of bainite component morphology on the microstructure of X70 low-alloyed steel on thick plate cold resistance

Article

The effect of controlled rolling and accelerated cooling production parameters on the structure and properties of plates 25 mm thick or more of strength category X70 is studied. A change is shown for the proportion of structural components in steel X70 with a ferrite-bainite microstructure in relation to CR regime. The presence in the steel microstructure of areas of bainitic ferrite, forming at the boundaries of coarse austenite grains as a result of austenite nonuniformity, leads to a reduction in the proportion of ductile component in the fracture of a DWTT specimen. An effect is revealed for an increase in the volume fraction of bainitic ferrite on plate cold brittleness during DWTT. The amount of reduction at the end of the roughing rolling stage should be less than 13–14 % in order to prevent a difference in austenite grain size. CR regimes with limited intensity make it possible to obtain a steel microstructure consisting mainly of quasipolygonal ferrite with a minimum number of areas of bainitic ferrite, which is favorable for steel DWTT properties.

Keywords

low-alloy steel microstructure cold resistance controlled rolling accelerated cooling bainitic ferrite quasipolygonal ferrite 

References

  1. 1.
    F. Khaisterkamp, K. Khulka, Yu. I. Matrosov, et al., Niobium-Containing Low-Alloy Steels [in Russian], SP Intermet Engineering, Moscow (1999).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    V. Schwinn, W. Schuertz, P. Fluess, et al., “Prospects and state of the art of TMCP steel plates for structural and line pipe applications,” Proc. THERMEC 2006 [C], Materials Science Forum, Switzerland (2007), Vols. 539–543, pp. 4726–4731.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yu. D. Morozov, M. Yu. Matrosov, S. Yu. B. Nastich, and A. B. Arabei, “High-strength pipe steels of a new generation with a ferrite-bainite structure,” Metallurg, No. 8, 39–42 (2008).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    S. Subramanian, L. Collins, M. Gheng-liang, et al., “Microstructure development for brittle fracture control in Nb microalloyed line pipe steel,” Proc. 6th Int. Conf. on High-Strength Low-Alloy Steels (HSLA Steels’2011), J. Iron Steel Res. Int., 18, Suppl. 1–2, 831–835 (May 2011).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    S.-H. Chon, J.-Y. Yoo, and D.-H. Seo, “Microstructure and mechanical properties of heavy gauge X70 offshore pipeline steels,” Proc. Pipeline Technology Conf., Oct. 12–14, 2009, Ostend, paper No: Ostend2009-054.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    I. Kozasu, C. Ouchi, T. Sampei, and T. Okita, “Rolling as a high-temperature thermomechanical process,” Proc. Microalloying’75 [C], Union carbide Corp., New York (1977).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. J. DeArdo, “Modern thermomechanical processing of microalloyed steel: A physical metallurgy perspective,” Proc. Microalloying’95 Conf., June 11–14, 1995, The Iron and Steel Society, Pittsburgh, PA, pp. 15–33.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    G. Krauss and S. W. Thompson, “Ferritic microstructures in continuous cooled low- and ultralow carbon steels,” ISIJ Int., 35, No. 8, 937–945 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. A. Smirnov, I. Yu. Pyshmintsev, and A. N. Boryakova, “Classification of low-carbon pipe steel microstructures,” Metallurg, No. 7, 45–51 (2010).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    M. Yu. Matrosov, L. I. Efron, A. A. Kichkina, and I. V. Lyasotskii, “Study of the microstructure of pipe steel microalloyed with niobium after different controlled rolling and accelerated cooling regimes,” MiTOM, No. 3(633), 44–49 (2008).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Li. Jia-D, Jiang Z-H, Li S.-P, et al., “Continuous cooling transformation behavior and mechanical properties of high strength pipeline steel,” Proc. HSLP 2010 Int. Seminar on Application of High Strength Line Pipe 2010, June 28–29, 2010, Xian, China.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    S. Yu. Nastich, Yu. D. Morozov, M. Yu. Matrosov, et al., “Effect of controlled rolling and accelerated parameters on structure and property formation for thick sheet rolled product of strength class K60,” Proc. 8th Congr. of Rolling Specialists, Oct. 1–15, 2010, Magnitogorsk, MOO Rolling Specialist Society (2010).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Y. M. Kim, S. K. Kim, Y. J. Lim, et al., “Influence of microstructures on yield-tensile strength ratio and low-temperature toughness of pipeline steels,” ISIJ Int., 42, No. 12, 1571–1577 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Bardin Central Research Institute of Ferrous Metallurgy (TsNIIchermet)MoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations