How to Fail a Scale: Reflections on a Failed Attempt to Assess Resilience
How we interpret concepts from suffering to survival has been historically debated in the field of anthropology, transcultural psychiatry, and global mental health. These debates have centered on the notion that such concepts are cross-culturally reproducible, although scholars who work the boundaries of culture, medicine, and psychiatry often triangulate methods from internationally standardized scales to various interpretive methods from participant observation to narrative. This article considers resilience, as opposed to suffering, as the subject of a reproducible entity by discussing the failure of an attempt to capture resilience via an internationally reputed scale called the “Resilience Scale for Adults” among cancer patients in urban South Africa. Our effort to utilize the internationally validated scale, and our attempt to draw on ethnographic and interview work to translate this scale to a locally relevant entity failed due to linguistic, cultural, and practical issues. In brief, the attempt failed because our resilience scale was too long, syntactically ambiguous, and culturally inappropriate. We write this article to spur a larger conversation about evaluating resilience from scale to ethnography, and how the concept and measurement of resilience might figure into fields of anthropology and medicine.
KeywordsAnthropology Resilience Psychometric measurement
This field methods paper was prepared with the financial support of the Provost Office and SFS Dean’s Office from Georgetown University. The second author was supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
- Friborg, O., Brlaug, D., Martinussen, M., Rosenvinge, J. H., & Hjemdal, O. (2005). Resilience in relation to personality and intelligence. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 6788(1), 2–5.Google Scholar
- Kim, A. W., B. Kaiser, E. Bosire, K. Shahbazian, and E. Mendenhall 2019 Idioms of Resilience Among Cancer Patients in Urban South Africa: An Anthropological Heuristic for the Study of Culture and Resilience. Transcultural Psychiatry (in press)Google Scholar
- Kohrt, B. A., & Mendenhall, E. (2015). Global Mental Health: Anthropological Perspectives. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.Google Scholar
- Kohrt, B. A., Rasmussen, A., Kaiser, B. N., Haroz, E. E., Maharjan, S. M., Mutamba, B. B., … Hinton, D. E. (2014). Cultural concepts of distress and psychiatric disorders: Literature review and research recommendations for global mental health epidemiology. International Journal of Epidemiology, 43(2), 365–406. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyt227 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Panter-Brick, C. (2014a). Health, Risk, and Resilience: Interdisciplinary Concepts and Applications. Annual Review of Anthropology, 43(February), 431–448. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102313-025944 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Panter-Brick, C. 2014b Health, Risk, and Resilience: Interdisciplinary Concepts and Applications. Annual Review of Anthropology 43. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102313-025944
- Panter-Brick, C., Dajani, R., Ager, A., Hadfield, K., Eggerman, M., & Ungar, M. (2018). Resilience in Context: A Brief and Culturally Grounded Measure for Syrian Refugee and Jordanian Host-Community Adolescents. Child Development, 89(5), 1803–1820. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12868 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Snodgrass, J. G., Lacy, M. G., & Upadhyay, C. (2017). “Developing culturally sensitive affect scales for global mental health research and practice: Emotional balance, not named syndromes, in Indian Adivasi subjective well-being.” Social Science and Medicine, 187, 174–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.06.037 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Trout, L., Wexler, L., and Moses, J. 2018 Beyond Two Worlds: Identity Narratives and the Aspirational Futures of Alaska Native Youth. Transcultural PsychiatryGoogle Scholar