Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry

, Volume 35, Issue 3, pp 417–435 | Cite as

The Evolving Classification of Dementia: Placing the DSM-V in a Meaningful Historical and Cultural Context and Pondering the Future of “Alzheimer’s”

  • Daniel R. GeorgeEmail author
  • Peter J. Whitehouse
  • Jesse Ballenger


Alzheimer’s disease is a 100-year-old concept. As a diagnostic label, it has evolved over the 20th and 21st centuries from a rare diagnosis in younger patients to a worldwide epidemic common in the elderly, said to affect over 35 million people worldwide. In this opinion piece, we use a constructivist approach to review the early history of the terms “Alzheimer’s disease” and related concepts such as dementia, as well as the more recent nosological changes that have occurred in the four major editions of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual since 1952. A critical engagement of the history of Alzheimer’s disease and dementia, specifically the evolution of those concepts in the DSM over the past 100 years, raises a number of questions about how those labels and emergent diagnoses, such as Neurocognitive Disorders and Mild Cognitive Impairment, might continue to evolve in the DSM-V, due for release in 2013.


Alzheimer’s disease Dementia Diagnostic and Statistical Manual Constructivism Brain aging 


  1. Alzheimer, Alois 1911 Über eigenartige Krankheitsfälle des späteren Alters. Zbl Ges Neurol Psych 4:356–385 (translated and with an introduction by H. Förstl and R. Levy, 1991).Google Scholar
  2. Alzheimer’s Association 2010 Proposed Revisions to Diagnostic Criteria for Alzheimer’s Disease: Backgrounder/FAQ. Electronic document,
  3. Alzheimer’s Association and National Alliance for Caregiving 2004 Families Care: Caregiving in the United States. Electronic document,, accessed October 15, 2010.
  4. American Psychiatric Association 1952 DSM-I, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual Mental Disorders. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  5. American Psychiatric Association 1968 DSM-II, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual Mental Disorders, ed 2. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  6. American Psychiatric Association 1980 DSM-III, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual Mental Disorders, ed 3. DC: Washington, American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  7. American Psychiatric Association 1987 DSM-III-R, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual Mental Disorders, 3rd Edition (rev.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  8. American Psychiatric Association 1994 DSM-IV Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  9. American Psychiatric Association 2010 DSM-5 Development. Delirium, Dementia, Amnestic, and Other Cognitive Disorders. Electronic document,,Dementia,Amnestic,OtherCognitive.aspx, accessed September 22, 2010.
  10. American Psychiatric Association Board of Trustees 1973 Homosexuality and Sexual Orientation Disturbance: Proposed Change in DSM-II, 6th printing, p. 44. Position Statement. APA Document Reference No. 730008. Electronic document,
  11. Anderson, Pauline 2010 Subjective Cognitive Impairment Early Indicator of Further Cognitive Deficits. Alzheimers Dement. 6:11–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ballenger, Jesse 2006 Self, Senility, and Alzheimer’s Disease in Modern America: A. History. Baltimore, Maryland: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Barnes Lisa L., Robert Wilson, Julia Bienias, et al. (2005) Sex Differences in the Clinical Manifestations of Alzheimer Disease Pathology. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 62(6):685–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Berrios, German E. 1987 Dementia During the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries: A Conceptual History. Psychol. Med. 17:829–837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bocti, Christian, John Whitehead, Lisa Fellow, et al. 2005 Characteristics of Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment Who Do Not Progress to Dementia. Neurology 64:A365.Google Scholar
  16. Boyd, Jeffrey H, Jack D. Burke, Ernest Gruenberg, et al. 1984 Exclusion Ccriteria for the DSM-III: A Study of Co-occurrence of Hierarchy-Free Syndromes. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 41:983–989.Google Scholar
  17. Brayne, Carol 2007 The Elephant in the Room—Healthy Brains in Later Life, Epidemiology and Public Health. Nature Neurosci. 8:233–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Brown, George W. 1978 Social Origins of Depression. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  19. Brownlee, Shannon 2007 Overtreated: Why Too Much Medicine Is Making Us Sicker and Poorer. New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  20. Castellani Rudy, Hyoung-gon Lee, Sandra L. Siedlak et al. (2009) Reexamining Alzheimer’s Disease: Evidence for a Protective Role for Amyloid-Beta Protein Precursor and Amyloid-Beta. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 18(2):447–452.Google Scholar
  21. Chilibeck, Gillian, Margaret Lock, and Megha Sehdev 2011 Postgenomics, Uncertain Futures, and the Familiarization of Susceptibility Genes. Social Science and Medicine (in press).Google Scholar
  22. Cohen, Gene D. (1983) Historical Views and Evolution of Concepts. In: B. Reisberg (ed) Alzheimer’s Disease. New York: Free Press, pp 29–33 Google Scholar
  23. Cohen, Lawrence 1998 No Ageing in India: Alzheimer’s, the Bad Family, and Other Modern Things. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  24. Crook, Thomas H., Richard T. Bartus, and Steven H. Ferris 1986 Age-Associated Memory Impairment: Proposed Diagnostic Criteria and Measures of Clinical Change report of a National Institute of Mental Health Work Group. Dev. Neuropsychol. 2:261–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. D’Alton, S., and Daniel R. George 2011 Changing Perspectives on Alzheimer’s Disease: Thinking Outside the Amyloid Box. Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2011-110089.
  26. Davis, Dona L., and Setha M. Low, eds. 1989 Gender, Health and Illness: The Case of Nerves. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  27. Dubois, Bruno, Howard H. Feldman, Claudia Jacova, et al. 2010 Revising the Definition of Alzheimer’s Disease: A New Lexicon. Lancet Neurology 9(11):1118–1127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Engel, George L. 1977 The Need for a New Medical Model: A Challenge for Biomedicine. Science196:129–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Engstrom, Eric J. 2007 Researching Dementia in Imperial Germany: Alois Alzheimer and the Economies of Psychiatric Practice. Cult. Med. Psychiatry 31:405–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Essink-Bot, Marie-Louise, Joaquin Pereria, Claire Packer, et al. 2002 Cross-national Comparability of Burden of Disease Estimates: The European Disablity Weights Project. Bull. WHO 80:644–652.Google Scholar
  31. Fábrega, Horacio 1994 International Systems of Diagnosis in Psychiatry. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 182:256–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Follette, W. C., and A. C. Houts 1996 Models of Scientific Progress and the Role of Theory in Taxonomy Development: A Case Study of the DSM. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 64:1120–1132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Fox, Patrick 1989 From Senility to Alzheimer’s Disease: The Rise of the Alzheimer’s Disease Movement. Milbank Q. 67:58–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gaines, Atwood D., ed. 1992a Ethnopsychiatry: The Cuhural Construction of Folk and Professional Psychiatries. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  35. Gaines Atwood D. 1992b From DSM-I to III-R; Voices of Self, Mastery and the Other: A Cultural Constructivist Reading of U.S. Psychiatric Classification. Social Science and Medicine 35(1):3–24.Google Scholar
  36. Gaines Atwood D. (2006) Dementia. In: H. James Birx (Ed). Encyclopedia of Anthropology, Vol. 2. Thousand Oaks, Sage, CA Pp. 725–726.Google Scholar
  37. Gallagher-Thompson, Dolores, Megan C. Leary, Celine Ossinalde, et al. 1997 Hispanic Caregivers of Older Adults with Dementia: Cultural Issues in Outreach and Intervention. Group 21(3):211–232.Google Scholar
  38. Gauthier, Serge, Barry Reisberg, Michael Zaudig, et al. 2006 Mild Cognitive Impairment. Lancet 367(9518):1262–1270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. George, Daniel R. 2010 Overcoming the Social Death of Dementia through Language. Lancet 376(9741):586–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. George, Daniel R., and Peter Whitehouse 2010 The Psychosocial Environment: An Intergenerational Approach. Natl. Acad. Aging Soc. Public Policy Aging Rep. 20(3):27–35.Google Scholar
  41. Graham Janice (2006) Reifying Relevance in Mild Cognitive Impairment: An Appeal for Care and Caution. Response to Commentaries. Philos. Psychol. Psychiatry 13(1):57–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Graham, Janice 2008 Facilitating Regulation: The Dance of Statistical Significance and Clinical Meaningfulness in Standardizing Technologies for Dementia. BioSocieties 3(3):241–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Graham Janice, Karen Ritchie (2006) Mild Cognitive Impairment: Ethical Considerations for Nosological Flexibility in Human Kinds. Philos. Psychol. Psychiatry 13(2):31–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Graham Janice, Arnold B. Mitnitski, Alexander J. Mogilner, and Kenneth Rockwood 1999 The Dynamics of Cognitive Aging: Distinguishing Functional Age and Disease from chronological age in a population. Am. J. Epidemiol. 150(10):1045–1054.Google Scholar
  45. Gubrium, Jaber F. 1986 Oldtimers and Alzheimer’s: The Descriptive Organization of Senility. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  46. Hachinski, Vladimir 2008 Shifts in Thinking About Dementia. JAMA 300(18):2172–2173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hendrie, Hugh C. 2006 Lessons Learned from International Comparative Cross-cultural Studies on Dementia. Am. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 14:480–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Herskovits, Elizabeth 1995 Struggling Over Subjectivity: Debates About the “Self” and Alzheimer’s Disease. Medical Anthropology Quarterly 9(2):146–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Holstein, Martha 1997 Alzheimer’s Disease and Senile Dementia, 1885–1920: An Interpretive History of Disease Negotiation. J. Aging Stud. 11:1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Horwitz, Alan V., and Jerome C. Wakefield 2007 The Loss of Sadness: How Psychiatry Transformed Normal Sorrow into Depressive Disorder. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Jelic, Vesna, Miia Kivipelto, and Bengt Winblad 2006 Clinical Trials in Mild Cognitive Impairment: Lessons for the Future. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 77(4):429-438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Karenberg, Axel, and Hans Forstl 2006 Dementia in the Greco-Roman World. J. Neurol. Sci. 244(1–2):5–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Katz, Stephen, and Kevin R. Peters 2008 Enhancing the Mind? Memory Medicine, Dementia, and the Ageing Brain. J. Age. Stud. 22:348–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Katzman, Robert, and Katherine Bick 2000 Alzheimer Disease: The Changing View. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  55. Kitwood, Tom 1997 Dementia Reconsidered: The Person Comes First. Philadelphia: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Kleinman, Arthur 1988a The Illness Narratives. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  57. Kleinman, Arthur 1988b Rethinking Psychiatry: From Cultural Category to Personal Experience. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  58. Kleinman, Arthur 1996 How Is Culture Important for DSM-IV?. In: J E Mezzich, A Kleinman, H Fabrega Jr, DL Parron (eds) Culture and Psychiatric Diagnosis: A DSM-IV Perspective. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press, pp 15–25Google Scholar
  59. Kral Voijtech A. 1962 Senescent Forgetfulness: Benign and Malignant. Can. Med. Assoc. J. 86(6):257– 260.Google Scholar
  60. Kupfer, David J., Michael B. First, Darrel A. Regier. (eds.) 2002 A Research Agenda for DSM-V. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  61. Kurz, Alexander F., and Nicola T. Lautenschlager 2010 The Concept of Dementia: Retain, Reframe, Rename, or Replace? Int. Psychogeriatr. 22(1):37–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Leibing Annette (2008) Entangled Matters—Alzheimer’s, Interiority, and the ‘Unflattening’ of the World. Cult. Med. Psychiatry 32(2):177–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Levy, Raymond 1994 Aging-Associated Cognitive Decline. Int. Psychogeriatr. 6:63–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Lewis-Fernandez, Roberto, and Arthur Kleinman 1995 Cultural Psychiatry. Theoretical, Clinical, and Research Issues. Psychiatr. Clin. North Am. 18:433–448.Google Scholar
  65. Lock, Margaret 2005 Alzheimer’s Disease: A Tangled Concept. In: Susan McKinnon, Sydel Silverman (eds) Complexities: Beyond Nature and Nurture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp 196–222Google Scholar
  66. Lock, Margaret 2010 Dementia Entanglements in a Postgenomic Era. Science, Technology & Human Values. November 17, 2010.Google Scholar
  67. Lyman, Karen A. 1989 Bringing the Social Back in: A Critique of the Biomedicalization of Dementia. Gerontologist 29:597–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Mahendra Nidhi (1987) Dementia. A Brief History of the Concept. In: B. Mahendra (ed.) Dementia. A Survey of the Syndrome of Dementia, 2nd ed. MTP Press, Lancaster, UK Pp. 1–18.Google Scholar
  69. Martin, Emily (1987) The Woman in the Body. Boston: BeaconGoogle Scholar
  70. Martin, Emily (2007) Bipolar Expeditions. Mania and Depression in American Culture. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
  71. Mast, Henning, Thomas K. Tatemichi, and J. P. Mohr 1995 Chronic Brain Ischemia: The Contributions of Otto Binswanger and Alois Alzheimer to the Mechanisms of Vascular Dementia. J. Neurol. Sci. 132:4–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Maurer, Konrad, and Ulrike Maurer 2003 Alzheimer: The Life of a Physicians and the Career of a Disease. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  73. Mayes, Rick, and Allan V. Horwitz 2005 DSM-III and the Revolution in the Classification of Mental Illness. J. Hist. Behav. Sci. 41(3):249–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. McGrattan, M. 2006 The Social Construction of Disease: Why Homosexuality Isn’t Like Cancer. In Bordering Biomedicine. V. Kalitzkus and P. Twohig, eds. New York: Rodophi.Google Scholar
  75. Mitnitski, Arnold, Janice E. Graham, Alexander J. Mogilner, and Kenneth Rockwood 1997 Vector Diagnostics in Dementia Derived from Bayes’ Theorem. Am. J. Epidemiol. 146:665–671.Google Scholar
  76. Möller, Hans J., and M. B. Graeber 1998 The Case Described by Alois Alzheimer in 1911. Historical and Conceptual Perspectives Based on the Clinical Record and Neurohistological Sections. Eur. Arch. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 248:111–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Newell, K. L., B. T. Hyman, J. H. Growdon, and E. T. Hedley-Whyte 1999 Application of the National Institute on Aging (NIA)–Reagan Institute Criteria for the Neuropathological Diagnosis of Alzheimer Disease. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 58:1147–1155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Novas, Carlos, and Nikolas Rose 2000 Genetic Risk and the Birth of the Somatic Individual. Econ. Soc. 29(4):483–513.Google Scholar
  79. Petzel, Janis 2008 Diagnostic Issues in Dementia: Advancing the Research Agenda for DSM-V: A Review. Psychiatr. Serv. 59:333–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Prince, Martin, and Jim Jackson 2009 World Alzheimer Report. Alzheimer’s Disease International. Electronic document,, accessed October 22, 2010.
  81. Plassman, Brenda L., John W. Williams, James R. Burke, et al. 2010 Systematic Review: Factors Associated With Risk for and Possible Prevention of Cognitive Decline in Later Life. Ann. Internal Med. 153(3):182–193.Google Scholar
  82. Richards, Marcus, and Carol Brayne 2010 What Do We Mean by Alzheimer’s Disease? BMJ 341:865–867.Google Scholar
  83. Ritchie, Karen 2004 Mild Cognitive Impairment: An Epidemiological Perspective. Dial. Clin. Neurosci. 6:401–408.Google Scholar
  84. Rivas-Vazquez, Rafeal A., Cecilia Mendez, Gustavo Rey, and Enrique J. Carrazana 2004 Mild Cognitive Impairment: New Neuropsychological and Pharmacological Target. Arch. Clin. Neuropsychol. 19(1):11–27.Google Scholar
  85. Roelcke, Volker 1997 Biologizing Social Facts: An Early 20th Century Debate on Kraepelin’s Concepts of Culture, Neurasthenia, and Degeneration. Cult. Med. Psychiatry 21:383–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Rounsaville, Bruce J. 2002 Experience with ICD-10/DSM-IV substance use disorders. Psychopathology 35(2–3):82–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Schneider, Julia A., Zoe Arvanitakis, W. Beng, et al. 2007 Mixed Brain Pathologies Account for Most Dementia Cases in Community-Dwelling Older Persons. Neurology 69:2197–2204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Schneider, Julie A., Neelum T. Aggarwal, Lisa Barnes, et al. 2009 The Neuropathology of Older Persons with and without Dementia from Community Versus Clinic Cohorts. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 18:691–701.Google Scholar
  89. Shabahangi, Nader, and Bogna Szymkiewicz 2008 Deeper into the Soul: Beyond Dementia and Alzheimer’s towards Forgetfulness Care. San Francisco: Elders Academy Press.Google Scholar
  90. Showalter, Elaine 1985 The Female Malady: Women, Madness and English Culture, 1830–1980. New York; Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  91. Snowdon, David A., Lydia Greiner, James A. Mortimer, et al. 1997 Brain Infarction and the Clinical Expression of Alzheimer’s Disease. The Nun Study. JAMA 277:813–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Stromgren, Eric (1983) The Strengths and Weaknesses of DSM-III. In: R. L. Spitzer, J. B. W. Williams, A. E. Skodol (eds) International Prespectives on DSM-III. Washington, DC: American Psychiatry Press, Pp. 69–77Google Scholar
  93. Sunderland, Trey, Dilip V. Jeste, Baiyewu Olusegun, et al. (eds). 2007 Diagnostic Issues in Dementia: Advancing the Research Agenda for DSM-V. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric.Google Scholar
  94. Thakker, Joanne, and Tony Ward 1998 Culture and Classification. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 18:501–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Tollis, D. 1994 Who Was Alzheimer? Nursing Times 90(34):49.Google Scholar
  96. Torack, Robert M. (1983) The Early History of Senile Dementia. In: B. Reisberg (ed) Alzheimer’s Disease. Free Press, New York, Pp. 23–28Google Scholar
  97. Turner, Victor W. 1969 The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-structure. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  98. Ussher Jane M. (1991) Women’s Madness: Misogyny or Mental Illness? University of Massachusetts Press, Amherst.Google Scholar
  99. Whitehouse, Peter J. 1985 Theodor Meynert: Foreshadowing Modern Concepts of Neuropsychiatric Pathophysiology. Neurology 35:389–391.Google Scholar
  100. Whitehouse, Peter J. 1993 Dementia. Philadelphia: F. A. Davis.Google Scholar
  101. Whitehouse, Peter, J., and Daniel R. George 2007 Is the Concept of Alzheimer’s Disease Outmoded? Alzheimer’s Dementia 4(4):331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Whitehouse, Peter, J., and Daniel R. George 2008 The Myth of Alzheimer’s: What You Aren’t Being Told about Today’s Most Dreaded Diagnosis. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  103. Whitehouse, Peter, J., and Daniel R. George 2009 Banking on Stories for Healthier Cognitive Ageing. Lancet 373:1166–1167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Whitehouse, Peter J., and Eric T. Juengst 2005 Antiaging Medicine and Mild Cognitive Impairment: Practice and Policy Issues for Geriatrics. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 53(8):1417–1422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Whitehouse, Peter J., Konrad Maurer, and Jesse F. Ballenger 2000 Aging, Culture, and the Framing of Alzheimer Disease. In Concepts of Alzheimer Disease: Biological, Clinical and Cultural. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  106. Whitehouse, Peter J., Atwood D. Gaines, Heather Lindstrom, et al. 2005 Anthropological Contributions to the Understanding of Age-Related Cognitive Impairment. Lancet Neurol. 4:320–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Whitehouse, Peter J., Daniel R. George, and Simon D’Alton 2011 Describing the Dying Days of “Alzheimer’s Disease.” Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease 24(1):11–13.Google Scholar
  108. Wig N.N. (1983) DSM-III: A Perspective from the Third World. In: R. L. Spitzer, J. B. W. Williams, and A. E. Skodol (eds.) International Prespectives on DSM-III. American Psychiatry Press, Washington, DC Pp. 79–89.Google Scholar
  109. Young, Allan 1995 The Harmony of Illusions: Inventing Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel R. George
    • 1
    Email author
  • Peter J. Whitehouse
    • 2
  • Jesse Ballenger
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of HumanitiesPenn State College of MedicineHersheyUSA
  2. 2.Department of NeurologyCase Western Reserve University, University Hospital SystemsClevelandUSA
  3. 3.Department of Science, Technology and SocietyPenn State UniversityState CollegeUSA

Personalised recommendations