Advertisement

Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry

, Volume 35, Issue 1, pp 3–25 | Cite as

I/We Narratives Among African American Families Raising Children with Special Needs

  • Lanita JacobsEmail author
  • Mary Lawlor
  • Cheryl Mattingly
Article

Abstract

This paper examines a statistics debate among African American caregivers raising children with disabilities for insights into the work of “African American mothering.” Using ethnographic, narrative and discourse analyses, we delineate the work that African American mothers do—in and beyond this conversation—to cross ideological and epistemological boundaries around race and disability. Their work entails choosing to be an “I” and, in some cases, actively resisting being seen as a “they” and/or part of a collective “we” in order to chart alternative futures for themselves and their children.

Keywords

Narrative African American Mothering Ways of knowing Race Disability 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We extend our deepest gratitude to the women who shared their experiences and insights and all of the family members, practitioners and members of the research team for their invaluable contributions. This work was supported by the National Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, and the Maternal and Child Health Bureau (Grant MCJ 060745, 1996–1999).

References

  1. Bowser, René 2001a Racial Bias in Medical Treatment. Dickinson Law Review 105(3):365–383.Google Scholar
  2. Bowser, René 2001b Racial Profiling in Health Care: An Institutional Analysis of Medical Treatment Disparities. Michigan Journal of Race & Law 7(33):79–133.Google Scholar
  3. Burns, Catherine E., and Lynne A. Bond. 2004 The Relationship Between Mothers’ Beliefs about Knowledge and Their Experiences in Parent Education. Journal of Primary Prevention 25(4):417–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Collins, Patricia Hill 1990 Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Cose, Ellis 1993 The Rage of a Privileged Class. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  6. Cose, Ellis 1998 Color-Blind: Seeing Beyond Race in a Race-Obsessed World. New York: Perennial (HarperCollins).Google Scholar
  7. DuBois, W.E.B. 1997 The Souls of Black Folk. In David W. Blight and Robert Gooding-Williams, eds. Boston: Bedford Books.Google Scholar
  8. Goodwin, Marjorie 1990 He-Said-She-Said: Talk as Social Organization Among Black Children. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Goffman, Erving 1991 Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  10. Gwaltney, John 1993 Drylongso: A Self-Portrait of Black America. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  11. Hurston, Zora Neale 1990 Mules and Men. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  12. Jackson, John L. 2001 Harlemworld: Doing Race and Class in Contemporary Black America. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Jacobs-Huey, Lanita 2006. From the Kitchen to the Parlor: Language and Becoming in African American Women’s Hair Care. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Jacobs-Huey, Lanita 2001 Epistemological Deliberations: Constructing and Contesting Knowledge in Women’s Cross-Cultural Hair Testimonies. Pp. 335–359 in EnGendering Rationalities. N. Tuana and S. Morgen, eds. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  15. Jones, Charisse, and Kumea Shorter-Gooden 2003 Shifting: The Double Lives of Black Women in America. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  16. Kulick, Don 2005 The Importance of What Gets Left Out. Discourse Studies 7(4–5):615–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lawlor, Mary 2004 Mothering Work: Negotiating Health Care, Illness, and Disability and Development. Pp. 306–323 in Mothering Occupations: Challenge, Agency, and Participation. S. Esdaile and J. Olsen, eds. Philadelphia: F. A. Davis.Google Scholar
  18. Lawlor, Mary, and Cheryl Mattingly 2001 Beyond the Unobstrusive Observer: Reflections on Researcher-Informant Relationships in Urban Ethnography. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 55:147–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mattingly, Cheryl 1998 Healing Dramas and Clinical Plots: The Narrative of Structure and Experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Mattingly, Cheryl, Mary Lawlor, and Lanita Jacobs-Huey 2002 Narrating September 11: Race, Gender, and the Play of Cultural Identities. American Anthropologist 104(3):743–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ochs, Elinor, and Lisa Capps 2001 Living Narrative: Creating Lives in Everyday Storytelling. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  22. O’Reilly, Karen 2005 Ethnographic Methods. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Personal Narratives Group, eds. 1989 Interpreting Women’s Lives: Feminist Theory and Personal Narratives. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Rapp, Rayna, and Faye Ginsburg 2001 Enabling Disability: Rewriting Kinship, Reimagining Citizenship. Public Culture 13(3):533– 556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rouse, Carolyn 2004 “If She’s a Vegetable, We’ll Be Her Garden”: Embodiment, Transcendence, and Citations of Competing Cultural Metaphors in the Case of a Dying Child. American Ethnologist 31(4):514–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Simons, Robin 1987 After the Tears: Parents Talk About Raising a Child with a Disability. San Diego, CA: Harvest.Google Scholar
  27. Smith, Valerie 1998 Not Just Race, Not Just Gender: Black Feminist Readings. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Snow, Londell F. 1998 Walkin’ Over Medicine. Detroit: Wayne State University.Google Scholar
  29. Visweswaran, Kamala 1994 Fictions of Feminist Ethnography. London: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  30. Williams, Linda 2001 Playing the Race Card: Melodramas of Black and White from Uncle Tom to O.J. Simpson. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.Department of Occupational Science and Occupational TherapyUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations