Advertisement

Meccanica

pp 1–12 | Cite as

Mechanics of 1–3 piezocomposites subjected to creep–fatigue loads

  • R. Pramanik
  • L. Santhosh
  • A. ArockiarajanEmail author
Article
  • 40 Downloads

Abstract

1–3 piezocomposites are extensively used for sensor, actuator, naval and aerospace applications owing to their enhanced electromechanical coupling, wider bandwidth and reliability. However, their performance gets adversely affected when they are subjected to combined static and dynamic loads that initiate both creep and fatigue damage, simultaneously. 1–3 piezocomposites undergo damage due to creep–fatigue interactions because of the passive and viscoelastic polymer matrix and inherent domain switching mechanisms. In this work, experiments are conducted to obtain the electromechanical response of 1–3 piezocomposites subjected to electrical fatigue and mechanical compressive creep loads. It is observed that, the electromechanical response degrades with increase in number of electrical fatigue cycles, matrix volume fraction and mechanical compressive pre-stress. A nonlinear phenomenological combined creep–fatigue damage model is developed within a thermodynamic framework to account for the creep–fatigue interactions in 1–3 piezocomposites. The model predictions are found to be in agreement with the experimental observations.

Keywords

1–3 piezocomposites Creep–fatigue interaction Thermodynamic framework 

Notes

Funding

This study was funded by the Naval Research Board (Project No.: NRB-379/MAT-16-17).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Smith WA (1990) The application of 1–3 piezocomposites in acoustic transducers. In: IEEE 7th international symposium on applications of ferroelectrics, 1990. IEEE, pp 145–152Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lee HJ, Zhang S (2012) Design of low-loss 1–3 piezoelectric composites for high-power transducer applications. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 59(9):1969ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lee HJ, Zhang S, Geng X, Shrout TR (2012) Electroacoustic response of 1–3 piezocomposite transducers for high power applications. Appl Phys Lett 101(25):253504ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Topolov VY, Bowen CR (2008) Electromechanical properties in composites based on ferroelectrics. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Odegard GM (2004) Constitutive modeling of piezoelectric polymer composites. Acta Mater 52(18):5315–5330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Aboudi J (2005) Hysteresis behavior of ferroelectric fiber composites. Smart Mater Struct 14(4):715ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Shindo Y, Narita F, Watanabe T (2010) Nonlinear electromechanical fields and localized polarization switching of 1–3 piezoelectric/polymer composites. Eur J Mech A Solids 29(4):647–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhao P, Li J (2009) Investigation of orientation effects on the electro-mechanical coupling behavior of 1–3 piezoelectric composites under compression. Smart Mater Struct 18(10):104011ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Eynbeygui M, Aghdam MM (2017) On the micro-mechanical study of 1–3 type piezoelectric composites with semi-coupled thermo-electro-elastic effects. Meccanica, Vancouver, pp 3693–3711zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jayendiran R, Arockiarajan A (2012) Modeling of dielectric and piezoelectric response of 1–3 type piezocomposites. J Appl Phys 112(4):044107ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pramanik R, Arockiarajan A (2018) Electro-mechanical creep of 1–3 piezocomposites: theoretical modeling and experimental approach. Ceram Int 44:13934–13943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jayendiran R, Arockiarajan A (2015) Experimental characterization and numerical modeling of time-dependent electro-mechanical response of piezocomposites. Int J Mech Sci 100:250–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Liu QD, Huber JE (2006) Creep in ferroelectrics due to unipolar electrical loading. J Eur Ceram Soc 26(13):2799–2806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhou D, Kamlah M (2005) Determination of room-temperature creep of soft lead zirconate titanate piezoceramics under static electric fields. J Appl Phys 98(10):104107ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhou D, Kamlah M (2006) Room-temperature creep of soft pzt under static electrical and compressive stress loading. Acta Mater 54(5):1389–1396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Belov AY, Kreher WS (2009) Creep in soft pzt: the effect of internal fields. Ferroelectrics 391(1):12–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Guillon O, Thiébaud F, Delobelle P, Perreux D (2004) Compressive creep of pzt ceramics: experiments and modelling. J Eur Ceram Soc 24(9):2547–2552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kim S-J, Ji DW (2013) Temperature-dependent compressive creep of ferroelectric ceramics and evolution of remnant state variables. J Eur Ceram Soc 33(10):1779–1792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pramanik R, Arockiarajan A (2018) Experimental and theoretical studies on mechanical creep of 1–3 piezocomposites. Acta Mech 229:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mohan Y, Arockiarajan A (2016) Experimental and theoretical investigation of temperature-dependent electrical fatigue studies on 1–3 type piezocomposites. AIP Adv 6(3):035311ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bhattacharyya M, Arockiarajan A (2013) Electrical fatigue behaviour in lead zirconate titanate: an experimental and theoretical study. Smart Mater Struct 22(8):085032ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mohan Y, Jayendiran R, Arockiarajan A (2015) Modeling and experimental characterization on fatigue behaviour of 1–3 piezocomposites. In: Behavior and mechanics of multifunctional materials and composites 2015, volume 9432. International Society for Optics and Photonics, p 94320FGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lianyong X, Zhao L, Gao Z, Han Y (2017) A novel creep–fatigue interaction damage model with the stress effect to simulate the creep–fatigue crack growth behavior. Int J Mech Sci 130:143–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zhao L, Lianyong X, Gao Z, Han Y, Jing H (2018) Characterization crack growth behavior in creep–fatigue loading conditions through different specimen geometries. Int J Mech Sci 145:246–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Maniprakash S, Jayendiran R, Menzel A, Arockiarajan A (2016) Experimental investigation, modelling and simulation of rate-dependent response of 1–3 ferroelectric composites. Mech Mater 94:91–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pramanik R, Arockiarajan A (2018) A hybrid phenomenological model for thermo-mechano-electrical creep of 1–3 piezocomposites. Philos Mag 99:1–21ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Maniprakash S, Arockiarajan A, Menzel A (2016) A multi-surface model for ferroelectric ceramics-application to cyclic electric loading with changing maximum amplitude. Philos Mag 96(13):1263–1284ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Pandey R, Vats G, Yun J, Bowen CR, Ho-Baillie AWY, Seidel J (2017) Perovskites for solar and thermal energy harvesting: state of the art technologies, current scenario and future directions. arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.05529
  29. 29.
    Topolov VY, Bowen CR (2009) Effective electromechanical properties in piezo-composites. In: Electromechanical properties in composite based on ferroelectrics, pp 11–41Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Coleman BD, Noll W (1974) The thermodynamics of elastic materials with heat conduction and viscosity. In: The foundations of mechanics and thermodynamics. Springer, Berlin, pp 145–156Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Leo Donald J (2007) Engineering analysis of smart material systems. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Laxman LV, Maniprakash S, Arockiarajan A (2018) A phenomenological model for nonlinear hysteresis and creep behaviour of ferroelectric materials. Acta Mech 229:1–15MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Jarzynski C (1999) Microscopic analysis of Clausius–Duhem processes. J Stat Phys 96(1–2):415–427ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Taira S (1962) Lifetime of structures subjected to varying load and temperature. In: Hoff NJ (ed) Creep in structures. IUTAM symposia (international union of theoretical and applied mechanics). Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Applied MechanicsIndian Institute of Technology MadrasChennaiIndia
  2. 2.College of Engineering GuindyAnna UniversityChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations