Advertisement

Meccanica

, Volume 54, Issue 9, pp 1351–1363 | Cite as

Path Integral approach via Laplace’s method of integration for nonstationary response of nonlinear systems

  • Alberto Di MatteoEmail author
Stochastics and Probability in Engineering Mechanics
  • 213 Downloads

Abstract

In this paper the nonstationary response of a class of nonlinear systems subject to broad-band stochastic excitations is examined. A version of the Path Integral (PI) approach is developed for determining the evolution of the response probability density function (PDF). Specifically, the PI approach, utilized for evaluating the response PDF in short time steps based on the Chapman–Kolmogorov equation, is here employed in conjunction with the Laplace’s method of integration. In this manner, an approximate analytical solution of the integral involved in this equation is obtained, thus circumventing the repetitive integrations generally required in the conventional numerical implementation of the procedure. Further, the method is extended to nonlinear oscillators, approximately modeling the amplitude of the system response as a one-dimensional Markovian process. Various nonlinear systems are considered in the numerical applications, including Duffing and Van der Pol oscillators. Appropriate comparisons with Monte Carlo simulation data are presented, demonstrating the efficiency and accuracy of the proposed approach.

Keywords

Path Integral Laplace’s method Nonstationary response Evolutionary excitation Probability density function 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Proppe C, Pradlwarter HJ, Schueller GI (2003) Equivalent linearization and Monte Carlo simulation in stochastic dynamics. Probab Eng Mech 18:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Smyth AW, Masri SF (2002) Non-stationary response of nonlinear systems using equivalent linearization with a compact analytical form of the excitation process. Probab Eng Mech 17:97–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Alotta G, Di Paola M, Pinnola FP (2017) Cross-correlation and cross-power spectral density representation by complex spectral moments. Probab Eng Mech 94:20–27Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pinnola FP (2016) Statistical correlation of fractional oscillator response by complex spectral moments and state variable expansion. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul 39:343–359ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Spanos PD, Sofi A, Di Paola M (2007) Nonstationary response envelope probability densities of nonlinear oscillators. J Appl Mech 74:315–324CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Spanos PD, Di Matteo A, Cheng Y, Pirrotta A, Li J (2016) Galerkin scheme-based determination of survival probability of oscillators with fractional derivative elements. J Appl Mech 83(12):121003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Di Matteo A, Spanos PD, Pirrotta A (2018) Approximate survival probability determination of hysteretic systems with fractional derivative elements. Probab Eng Mech 54:138–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vanvinckenroye H, Kougioumtzoglou IA, Denoël V (2019) Reliability function determination of nonlinear oscillators under evolutionary stochastic excitation via a Galerkin projection technique. Nonlinear Dyn 95:293–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Spanos PD, Kougioumtzoglou IA (2012) Harmonic wavelets based statistical linearization for response evolutionary power spectrum determination. Probab Eng Mech 27:57–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kougioumtzoglou IA, Spanos PD (2012) An analytical Wiener path integral technique for non-stationary response determination of nonlinear oscillators. Probab Eng Mech 28:125–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kougioumtzoglou IA, Di Matteo A, Spanos PD, Pirrotta A, Di Paola M (2015) An efficient wiener path integral technique formulation for stochastic response determination of nonlinear MDOF systems. J Appl Mech 82:101005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gardiner CW (1985) Handbook for stochastic methods for physics, chemistry and the natural sciences. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Risken H (1984) The Fokker–Planck equation, methods of solution and applications. Springer, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wehner MF, Wolfer WG (1983) Numerical evaluation of path integral solutions to Fokker–Planck equations. Phys Rev A 27:2663–2670ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wehner MF, Wolfer WG (1983) Numerical evaluation of path-integral solutions to Fokker–Planck equations. II. Restricted stochastic processes. Phys Rev A 28:3003–3011ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wehner MF, Wolfer WG (1987) Numerical evaluation of path integral solutions to Fokker–Planck equations. III. Time and functionally dependent coefficients. Phys Rev A 35:1795–1801ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Naess A, Johnsen JM (1993) Response statistics of nonlinear, compliant offshore structures by the path integral solution method. Probab Eng Mech 8:91–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lin H, Yim SCS (1996) Nonlinear rocking motions. II: overturning under random excitations. J Eng Mech 122:728–735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Barone G, Navarra G, Pirrotta A (2008) Probabilistic response of linear structures equipped with nonlinear damper devices (PIS method). Probab Eng Mech 23:125–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Iourtchenko DV, Mo E, Naess A (2006) Response probability density functions of strongly non-linear systems by the path integration method. Int J Non-Linear Mech 41:693–705MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Naess A, Moe V (2000) Efficient path integration methods for nonlinear dynamic systems. Probab Eng Mech 15:221–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Naess A, Moe V (1996) Stationary and non-stationary random vibration of oscillators with bilinear hysteresis. Int J Non-Linear Mech 31:553–562CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Di Paola M, Santoro R (2008) Path integral solution for nonlinear system enforced by Poisson White Noise. Probab Eng Mech 23:164–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pirrotta A, Santoro R (2011) Probabilistic response of nonlinear systems under combined normal and Poisson white noise via path integral method. Probab Eng Mech 26:26–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Di Matteo A, Di Paola M, Pirrotta A (2016) Path integral solution for nonlinear systems under parametric Poissonian white noise input. Probab Eng Mech 44:89–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bucher C, Di Matteo A, Di Paola M, Pirrotta A (2016) First-passage problem for nonlinear systems under Lévy white noise through path integral method. Nonlinear Dyn 85:1445–1456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kougioumtzoglou IA, Spanos PD (2013) Response and first-passage statistics of nonlinear oscillators via a numerical path integral approach. J Eng Mech 139:1207–1217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Alevras P, Yurchenko D (2016) GPU computing for accelerating the numerical Path Integration approach. Comput Struct 171:46–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ren Z, Xu W, Qiao Y (2019) Local averaged path integration method approach for nonlinear dynamic systems. Appl Math Comp 344–345:68–77MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Yue X, Xu W, Xu Y, Sun JQ (2019) Non-stationary response of MDOF dynamical systems under combined Gaussian and Poisson white noises by the generalized cell mapping method. Probab Eng Mech.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2019.01.001 Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bender CM, Orszag SA (1999) Advanced Mathematical methods for scientists and Engineers I: asymptotic methods and perturbation theory. Springer, New YorkCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Miller PD (2006) Applied asymptotic analysis. American Mathematical Society, ProvidenceCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Deng ML, Fu Y, Huang ZL (2014) Asymptotic analytical solutions of first-passage rate to quasi- nonintegrable Hamiltonian systems. J Appl Mech 81:081012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Xu Y, Li H, Wang H, Jia W, Yue X, Kurths J (2017) The estimates of the mean first exit time of a bistable system excited by Poisson white noise. J Appl Mech 84:091004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Roberts JB, Spanos PD (2003) Random vibration and statistical linearization. Dover Publications, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kanai K (1957) Semi-empirical formula for the seismic characteristics of the ground. Bull Earthq Res Inst 35:309–325Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Tajimi H (1960) A statistical method for determining the maximum response of a building structure during an earthquake. In: Proceedings of the 2nd world conference on earthquake engineering, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Alotta G, Di Paola M, Pirrotta A (2014) Fractional Tajimi-Kanai model for simulating earthquake ground motion. Bull Earthq Eng 12:2495–2506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Lin YK (1967) Probabilistic theory of structural dynamics. McGraw Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Iwan WD, Spanos PD (1978) Response envelope statistics for nonlinear oscillators with random excitation. J Appl Mech 45:170–174CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dipartimento di IngegneriaUniversità degli Studi di PalermoPalermoItaly

Personalised recommendations