Advertisement

Meccanica

, Volume 54, Issue 3, pp 353–379 | Cite as

Dynamics of cable truss via polynomial shape functions

  • Marco ZurruEmail author
Article
  • 93 Downloads

Abstract

A model for the in-plane dynamic behaviour of a biconcave cable structure, subject to large static deformations and potentially slack harnesses is proposed, based on polynomial shape functions, in line with the classical Ritz method. The model provides a semi-analytical approach to the calculation of natural frequencies and modal shapes of the structure. The proposed formulation leads to an eigenvalue problem, based on a reduced number of degrees of freedom compared with equivalent FEM solutions, providing the basis for fast and accurate sensitivity analysis. The behaviour of the deformed structure is analysed in detail to understand the non-linear effects of non-symmetric mass and load distribution and slack harnesses on natural frequencies and corresponding modal shapes. Results confirm the relevance of the non-linear effects, due to the statically loaded configuration, on the linear vibrations of the structure, in particular evidencing the influence of the slackening of harnesses on modal shapes. Results are compared to analytical models, where available (single sagged cable), and to FEM solutions (for cable trusses with non-uniform mass and load distribution and potentially slack harnesses), providing good agreement.

Keywords

Cable structures Dynamics Non-linear effects Large deformations 

References

  1. 1.
    Ammann OH, von Kàrmàn T, Woodruff GB (1941) The failure of the Tacoma Narrows bridge—a report to the Honorable John M. Carmody, Administrator, Federal Works Agency, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Irvine HM, Caughey TK (1974) The linear theory of free vibrations of a suspended cable. Proc R Soc Lond Ser A 341:299–315ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Irvine HM (1978) Free vibrations of inclined cables. J Struct Div 104:343–347Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Irvine HM, Sinclair G (1976) The suspended elastic cable under the action of concentrated vertical loads. Int J Solids Struct 12:309–317CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Irvine HM (1981) Cable structures. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rega G, Vestroni F, Benedettini F (1984) Parametric analysis of large amplitude free vibrations of a suspended cable. Int J Solids Struct 20:95–105CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Triantafyllou MS, Triantafyllou GS (1991) Frequency coalescence and mode localization phenomena: a geometric theory. J Sound Vib 150:485–500ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rega G (2004) Nonlinear vibrations of suspended cables—part I: modeling and analysis. Appl Mech Rev 57:443ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rega G (2004) Nonlinear vibrations of suspended cables, part II: deterministic phenomena. Appl Mech Rev 57:479–514ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Srinil N, Rega G, Chucheepsakul S (2007) Two-to-one resonant multi-modal dynamics of horizontal/inclined cables. Part I: theoretical formulation and model validation. Nonlinear Dyn 48:231–252CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lepidi M, Gattulli V (2012) Static and dynamic response of elastic suspended cables with thermal effects. Int J Solids Struct 49:1103–1116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mansour A, Mekki OB, Montassar S, Rega G (2017) Catenary-induced geometric nonlinearity effects on cable linear vibrations. J Sound Vib 413:332ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mesarovic S, Gasparini DA (1992) Dynamic behavior of nonlinear cable system. I. J Eng Mech 118:890–903CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mesarovic S, Gasparini DA (1992) Dynamic behavior of nonlinear cable system. II. J Eng Mech 118:904–920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Brownjohn JMW (1997) Vibration characteristics of a suspension footbridge. J Sound Vib 201(1):29–46ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chen Z, Cao H, Zhu H, Hu J, Li S (2014) A simplified structural mechanics model for cable-truss footbridges and its implications for preliminary design. Eng Struct 68:121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wang Z, Kang H, Sun C, Zhao Y, Yi Z (2014) Modeling and parameter analysis of in-plane dynamics of a suspension bridge with transfer matrix method. Acta Mech 225(12):3423–3435MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zurru M (2016) Nonlinear model for cable trusses based on polynomial shape functions and energy approach. J Struct Eng.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001480 Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kassimali A, Parsi-Feraidoonian H (1987) Strength of cable trusses under combined loads. J Struct Eng 113:907–924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kmet S, Kokorudova Z (2006) Nonlinear analytical solution for cable truss. J Eng Mech 132:119–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kmet S, Kokorudova Z (2009) Non-linear closed-form computational model of cable trusses. Int J Non-linear Mech 44:735–744CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ing. Marco ZurruMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations