Meccanica

pp 1–15 | Cite as

Control of wetness fraction and liquid droplet size in wet steam two phase flows with hot steam injection

Article

Abstract

The sudden expansion of steam in the last stages of turbines causes a nucleation process to take place and liquid droplets to appear. Parts of these droplets, which grow collide with the blades and seriously damage them. This mechanical destruction also coincides with a thermodynamic shock which suddenly increases the pressure and reduces the performance of the steam turbine. In the present study, an attempt is made to control the size of droplets and liquid mass fraction by injecting hot steam to reduce the level of the damage. This process is similar to extracting steam from upper stages and injecting it into downstream stages. In order to prove the concept of this method, a one-dimensional in-house, two-phase flow code with steam injection is developed. The conservation equations are formulated for the vapor/liquid mixture and the liquid phase is modeled by two additional transport equations. Size and number of droplets together with liquid mass fraction are calculated in different convergent-divergent nozzles and the results are compared with experimental values. Then, the steam with higher pressure and temperature is injected into various locations in the nozzle. The results show that injecting hot steam in the divergent point of the nozzle downstream of the throat and following the Wilson point reduces the size of droplets but increases their number, which can ultimately, degrade the erosion of the blades. It is also concluded that in such a situation, the injection mass flow rate of nearly 5% of main stream flow with a temperature of about 30% higher than the main stream temperature is efficient in controlling wet steam parameters.

Keywords

Wet steam Hot steam injection Eulerian–Eulerian model Laval nozzle Condensation 

References

  1. 1.
    Dykas S, Wróblewski W (2012) Numerical modelling of steam condensing flow in low and high-pressure nozzles. Int J Heat Mass Transf 55(21):6191–6199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gerber A, Kermani M (2004) A pressure based Eulerian–Eulerian multi-phase model for non-equilibrium condensation in transonic steam flow. Int J Heat Mass Transf 47(10):2217–2231CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Halama J et al (2010) Numerical modeling of unsteady flow in steam turbine stage. J Comput Appl Math 234(7):2336–2341MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Halama J, Benkhaldoun F, Fořt J (2010) Numerical modeling of two-phase transonic flow. Math Comput Simul 80(8):1624–1635MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dehouve J, Nardin P, Zeghmati M (1999) Erosion study of final stage blading of low pressure steam turbines. Appl Surf Sci 144:238–243ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lee B-E et al (2003) Development of a water droplet erosion model for large steam turbine blades. KSME int J 17(1):114–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Baumann K (1921) Some recent developments in large steam turbine practice. J Inst Electr Eng 59(302):565–623Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Liu J, Lin Z, Wen X (2005) Recent advances in the technology of moisture removal in steam turbines. J Eng Therm Energy Power 20(1):1–5Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tanuma T, Sakamoto T (1991) The removal of water from steam turbine stationary blades by suction slots. In: Proceedings of IMechE conference on turbomachineryGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hou Y et al (2011) Numerical simulation of a new hollow stationary dehumidity blade in last stage of steam turbine. Front Energy 5(3):288–296Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ryley D, Al-Azzawi H (1983) Suppression of the deposition of nucleated fog droplets on steam turbine stator blades by blade heating. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 4(4):207–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    McDonald JE (1962) Homogeneous nucleation of vapor condensation I. Thermodynamic aspects. Am J Phys 30(12):870–877ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Vukalovich MP (1958) Thermodynamic properties of water and steam, 6th edn. Mashgis, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bakhtar F, Piran M (1979) Thermodynamic properties of supercooled steam. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 1(2):53–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kermani M, Gerber A (2003) A general formula for the evaluation of thermodynamic and aerodynamic losses in nucleating steam flow. Int J Heat Mass Transf 46(17):3265–3278CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Simpson D, White A (2005) Viscous and unsteady flow calculations of condensing steam in nozzles. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 26(1):71–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Young J (1992) Two-dimensional, nonequilibrium, wet-steam calculations for nozzles and turbine cascades. J Turbomach 114(3):569–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hill PG (1966) Condensation of water vapour during supersonic expansion in nozzles. J Fluid Mech 25(03):593–620ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kermani M, Gerber A, Stockie J (2003) Thermodynamically based moisture prediction using Roe’s scheme. In: The 4th conference of Iranian AeroSpace society, Amir Kabir University of Technology, Tehran, IranGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kermani M, Gerber A, Stockie J (2006) An application of Roes high resolution scheme to transonic two-phase flow through nozzles. Iranian J Mech Eng:Trans ISME 7:60–77Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Stein G (1978) On tie growtl of sten droplets formed in a Lull lizzie using both static pressure ail light scattering measurements. J Fluids Eng 100(3):311–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Moore M et al (1973) Predicting the fog-group size in wet-steam turbines, Institution of Mechanical Engineers, wet steam 4 conference, paper C/37/73Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bakhtar F, Mahpeykar M (1997) On the performance of a cascade of turbine rotor tip section blading in nucleating steam Part 3: theoretical treatment. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C: J Mech Eng Sci 211(3):195–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ahmad M, Schatz M, Casey M (2013) Experimental investigation of droplet size influence on low pressure steam turbine blade erosion. Wear 303(1):83–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Aerospace EngineeringAmirkabir University of TechnologyTehranIran

Personalised recommendations