Advertisement

Meccanica

, Volume 52, Issue 1–2, pp 197–211 | Cite as

Estimating the standard deviation of eigenvalue distributions for the nonlinear free-vibration stochastic dynamics of cable networks

  • Luca Caracoglia
  • Gian Felice Giaccu
  • Bernardo Barbiellini
Article

Abstract

Cross-ties are used on cable-stayed bridges for mitigating wind-induced stay vibration. The system obtained by connecting two adjacent stays with a transverse cross-tie is the basic component of an “in-plane cable network”. Failures in the restrainers of cable networks have motivated investigations focusing on the nonlinear dynamics of cable networks. In these problems, the nonlinearity in the restoring force transferred by the cross-tie is used to simulate the behavior at incipient failure. The “equivalent linearization method” can be used to reduce the system of nonlinear dynamic equations to an equivalent eigenvalue/eigenvector problem, which is solved algebraically as a function of a reference amplitude parameter. Since the value of the initial vibration amplitude during aeroelastic vibration is affected by uncertainties, simulations based on stochastic processes must be considered. The resulting random nonlinear eigenvalue problem can be solved with an implementation of the standard stochastic approximation (SA). We propose here a novel numerical procedure, based on a “layered” SA algorithm, to estimate not only the mean but the standard deviation of the eigenvalue distribution as well. This method is computationally efficient and can accurately evaluate the average and standard deviation of the random eigenvalue (frequency), mode by mode. Therefore, we have now enabled a more complete and numerically efficient characterization of the frequency probability distribution.

Keywords

Cable-stayed bridges Stays Wind Nonlinear vibration Stochastic approximation Monte Carlo method 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was supported in part by Northeastern University (NEU), Office of the Provost, “Tier-1 Seed Grant” for Interdisciplinary Research Projects in 2011–2014. The second author gratefully acknowledges the financial support of the “Regione Autonoma della Sardegna” (L.R. n. 7/2010, Grant “M4” CRP-27585 and L.R. n. 3/2008 “Rientro Cervelli”). Numerical computations were performed on the cyber-grid of the NEU’s College of Engineering; collaboration with Techila Technologies, Ltd. of Finland is gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. 1.
    Matsumoto M, Yagi T, Hatsuda H, Shima T, Tanaka M, Naito H (2010) Dry galloping characteristics and its mechanism of inclined/yawed cables. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 98(6–7):317–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zuo D, Jones NP (2010) Interpretation of field observations of wind- and rain–wind-induced stay cable vibrations. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 98(2):73–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Macdonald JHG, Larose GL (2008) Two-degree-of-freedom inclined cable galloping—Part 1: General formulation and solution for perfectly tuned system. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 96(3):291–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Macdonald JHG, Larose GL (2008) Two-degree-of-freedom inclined cable galloping—Part 2: analysis and prevention for arbitrary frequency ratio. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 96(3):308–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Matsumoto M, Ishizaki H (2014) Stall-type galloping and VIV-initiated galloping of inclined stay cable aerodynamics and its aerodynamic stabilization (Keynote Lecture). In: Symposium on the Dynamics and Aerodynamics of Cables (SDAC), Technical University of Denmark (DTU), Copenhagen, Denmark, September 25–26, 2014Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Warnitchai P, Fujino Y, Susumpow T (1995) A nonlinear dynamic model for cables and its application to a cable–structure system. J Sound Vib 187(4):695–712ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Perkins NC (1992) Modal interactions in the nonlinear response of elastic cables under parametric/external excitation. Int J Nonlinear Mech 27(2):233–250CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lilien JL, Pinto da Costa A (1994) Modal interactions in the nonlinear response of elastic cables under parametric/external excitation. Int J Nonlinear Mech 27(2):233–250Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pinto da Costa A, Martins J, Branco F, Lilien JL (1996) Oscillations of bridge stay cables induced by periodic motions of deck and/or towers. ASCE J Eng Mech 122(7):613–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gattulli V, Lepidi M (2003) Nonlinear interactions in the planar dynamics of cable-stayed beam. Int J Solids Struct 40(18):4729–4748CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gattulli V, Lepidi M (2007) Localization and veering in the dynamics of cable-stayed bridges. Comput Struct 85(21–22):1661–1678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Liu M-Y, Zuo D, Jones NP (2005) Deck-induced stay cable vibrations: field observations and analytical model. In: 6th international symposium on cable dynamics, Charleston, South Carolina, USA, September 19–22, 2005, pp 175–182Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ehsan F, Scanlan RH (1989) Damping stay cables with ties. In: 5th US-Japan bridge workshop, pp 203–217Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bosch HR, Park SW (2005) Effectiveness of external dampers and crossties in mitigation of stay cable vibrations. In: 6th international symposium on cable dynamics, Charleston, South Carolina, USA, September 19–22, 2005Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Irvine HM (1981) Cable structures. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Caracoglia L, Zuo D (2009) Effectiveness of cable networks of various configurations in suppressing stay-cable vibration. Eng Struct 31(12):2851–2864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ahmad J, Cheng S (2014) Impact of key system parameters on the in-plane dynamic response of a cable network. J Struct Eng ASCE 140(3):04013079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ahmad J, Cheng S (2015) Analytical study on in-plane free vibration of a cable network with straight alignment rigid cross-ties. J Vib Control 21(7):1299–1320MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ahmad J, Cheng S (2013) Effect of cross-link stiffness on the in-plane free vibration behaviour of a two-cable network. Eng Struct 52:570–580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yamaguchi H, Alauddin M (2003) Control of cable vibrations using secondary cable with special reference to nonlinearity and interaction. Eng Struct 25(6):801–816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Giaccu GF, Caracoglia L (2012) Effects of modeling nonlinearity in cross-ties on the dynamics of simplified in-plane cable networks. Struct Control Health Monit 19(3):348–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Giaccu GF, Caracoglia L (2013) Generalized power-law stiffness model for nonlinear dynamics of in-plane cable networks. J Sound Vib 332(8):1961–1981ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Giaccu GF, Barbiellini B, Caracoglia L (2015) Parametric study on the nonlinear dynamics of a three-stay cable network under stochastic free vibration. J Eng Mech ASCE 141(6):04014166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Spall JC (2003) Introduction to stochastic search and optimization: Estimation, simulation and control. Wiley, HobokenCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Robbins H, Monro S (1951) Stochastic approximation method. Ann Math Stat 22(3):400–407MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Harju A, Barbiellini B, Siljamäki S, Nieminen RM, Ortiz G (1997) Stochastic gradient approximation: an efficient method to optimize many-body wave functions. Phys Rev Lett 79(1997):1173–1177ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Nissenbaum DA (2008) The stochastic gradient approximation: an application to Li nanoclusters. PhD Dissertation, Northeastern University (http://hdl.handle.net/2047/d10016466), Boston, MA, USA
  28. 28.
    Grigoriu M (1992) A solution of the random eigenvalue problem by crossing theory. J Sound Vib 158(1):69–80ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Warner JE, Grigoriu M, Aquino W (2013) Stochastic reduced order models for random vectors: application to random eigenvalue problems. Probab Eng Mech 31:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ghanem R, Ghosh D (2007) Efficient characterization of the random eigenvalue problem in a polynomial chaos decomposition. Int J Numer Meth Eng 72(4):486–504MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Le Maître OP, Knio OM (2010) Spectral methods for uncertainty quantification. Springer, DordrechtCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Giaccu GF, Caracoglia L, Barbiellini B (2014) Modeling unilateral response in the cross-ties of a cable network: deterministic vibration. J Sound Vib 333(19):4427–4443ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Macdonald J (2014) Response amplitudes of nonlinear stay cable vibrations (Keynote Lecture). In: Symposium on the Dynamics and Aerodynamics of Cables (SDAC), Technical University of Denmark (DTU), Copenhagen, Denmark, September 25–26, 2014Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Srinil N, Rega G, Chucheepsakul S (2004) Three-dimensional nonlinear coupling and dynamic tension in the large-amplitude free vibrations of arbitrarily sagged cables. J Sound Vib 269(3–5):823–852ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Pilipchuk VN, Vakakis AF (1998) Study of the oscillations of a nonlinearly supported string using nonsmooth transformations. J Vib Acoust 120(2):434–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Giaccu GF, Barbiellini B, Caracoglia L (2015) Stochastic unilateral free vibration of an in-plane cable network. J Sound Vib 340(15):95–111ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Grigoriu M (2002) Stochastic calculus. Applications in science and engineering. Birkhäuser, BerlinCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Robert CP, Casella G (2004) Monte Carlo statistical methods, 2nd edn. Springer Science, New YorkCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Bucher C (2009) Computational analysis of randomness in structural mechanics. Taylor Francis Group, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Hoffmann L, Shukla A, Peter M, Barbiellini B, Manuel AA (1993) Linear and nonlinear approaches to solve the inverse problem: applications to positron annihilation experiments. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res Sect A 335(1–2):276–287ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Barbiellini B, Fischer O, Peter M, Renner C, Weger M (1994) Gap distribution of the tunneling spectra in Bi2Sr2CaCu2Ox and some other superconductors. Phys C 220(1–2):55–60ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Adhikari S, Friswell MI (2004) Random eigenvalue problems in structural dynamics. In: 45th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics & materials conference (paper AIAA 2004-1747), Palm Springs, California, USA, 19–22 April, 2004Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luca Caracoglia
    • 1
  • Gian Felice Giaccu
    • 2
  • Bernardo Barbiellini
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringNortheastern UniversityBostonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Architecture, Design and Urban PlanningUniversity of SassariAlgheroItaly
  3. 3.Department of PhysicsNortheastern UniversityBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations