Advertisement

Meccanica

, Volume 51, Issue 7, pp 1583–1593 | Cite as

Joint force decomposition and variation in unified inverse dynamics analysis of a metamorphic parallel mechanism

  • Dongming Gan
  • Jian S. Dai
  • Jorge Dias
  • Lakmal Seneviratne
Recent Progress and Novel Applications of Parallel Mechanisms

Abstract

This paper presents a unified inverse kinematics and dynamics model of a metamorphic parallel mechanism with pure rotation and pure translation phases. By altering one rotation axis of the reconfigurable Hooke (rT) joints in the limbs, the mechanism can be switched into one of the two phases. To provide joint reaction forces for optimal design and control, Newton method is used in developing the dynamics model which is unified by combining geometric constraints and parameters in both phases. An analytical investigation provides special joint force decomposition and limb coordinate setup to decouple the dynamics equations between the platform and the limbs. This reduces the dynamics computation load from solving a 15 × 15 matrix to a 6 × 6 matrix. A numerical example is given to illustrate the proposed method and simulation results are explained and compared between the two phases. The work on this paper gives good reference for optimal design and control of this metamorphic parallel mechanism in different applications using two phases.

Keywords

Parallel mechanism Reconfigurable Unified dynamics Joint force decomposition 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The work is partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project Nos. 51375058 and 51205016), the New Century Excellent Talents in University (Project No. NCET-12-0796), the Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education (Project No. 20120005110008).

References

  1. 1.
    Gan DM, Dai JS, Liao QZ (2009) Mobility change in two types of metamorphic parallel mechanisms. ASME J Mech Robot 1:041007-1–041007-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Merlet JP (2008) Parallel robots, 2nd edn. Springer, The NetherlandsMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gan DM, Dai JS, Caldwell DG (2011) Constraint-based limb synthesis and mobility-change aimed mechanism construction. ASME J Mech Des 133(5):051001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dai JS, Rees JJ (1998) Mobility in metamorphic mechanisms of foldable/erectable kinds. In: Proceeding of 25th ASME biennial mechanisms and robotics conference, Atlanta, GAGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wohlhart K (1996) Kinematotropic Linkages. In: Lenarcic J, Parenti-Castelli V (eds) Advances in robot kinematics. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 359–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Parise JJ, Howell LL, Magleby SP (2000) Ortho-planar mechanisms. In: Proceeding of 26th biennial mechanisms and robotics conference, Baltimore, MD, Paper No. DETC2000/MECH-14193Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chen IM, Li SH, Cathala A (2003) Mechatronic design and locomotion of amoebot—a metamorphic underwater vehicle. J Robot Syst 20(6):307–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dai JS, Rees JJ (2005) Matrix representation of topological changes in metamorphic mechanisms. ASME J Mech Des 127(4):837–840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kuo CH, Yan HS (2007) On the mobility and configuration singularity of mechanisms with variable topologies. ASME J Mech Des 129:617–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fanghella P, Galletti C, Giannotti E (2006) Parallel robots that change their group of motion. Advances in robot kinematics. Springer, The Netherlands, pp 49–56MATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zhang KT, Dai JS, Fang YF (2010) Topology and constraint analysis of phase change in the metamorphic chain and its evolved mechanism. ASME J Mech Des 132(12):121001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kong X, Gosselin CM, Richard PL (2007) Type synthesis of parallel mechanisms with multiple operation modes. ASME J Mech Des 129(7):595–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tsai MS, Yuan WH (2010) Inverse dynamics analysis for a 3-PRS parallel mechanism based on a special decomposition of the reaction forces. Mech Mach Theory 45:1491–1508CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Taghvaeipour A, Angeles J, Lessard L (2013) Constraint-wrench analysis of robotic manipulators. Multibody Syst Dyn 29(2):139–168MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tsai LW (2000) Solving the inverse dynamics of a Stewart–Gough manipulator by the principle of virtual work. J Mech Des 122:3–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Li M, Huang T, Mei JP, Zhao XM, Chetwynd DG, Hu SJ (2005) Dynamic formulation and performance comparison of the 3-DOF modules of two reconfigurable PKMs—the Tricept and the TriVariant. ASME J Mech Des 127(6):1129–1136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dasgupta B, Choudhury P (1999) A general strategy based on the Newton–Euler approach for the dynamic formulation of parallel manipulators. Mech Mach Theory 34:801–824MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Khalil W, Guegan S (2004) Inverse and direct dynamic modeling of Gough–Stewart robots. IEEE Trans Robot 20(4):754–762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Khan WA, Krovi VN, Saha SK, Angeles J (2005) Recursive kinematics and inverse dynamics for a planar 3R parallel manipulator. J Dyn Syst Meas Contr 127:529–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Staicu S (2009) Recursive modeling in dynamics of Agile Wrist spherical parallel robot. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 25:409–416MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Li Y, Xu Q (2005) Kinematics and inverse dynamics analysis for a general 3-PRS spatial parallel mechanism. Robotica 23:219–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tsai LW (1993) Robot analysis: the mechanics of serial and parallel manipulators. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gosselin CM (1993) Parallel computational algorithms for the kinematics and dynamics of parallel manipulators. Proc ICRA N Y 1:883–888Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yuan WH, Tsai MS (2014) A novel approach for forward dynamic analysis of 3-PRS parallel manipulator with consideration of friction effect. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 30:315–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gan DM, Dai JS, Dias J, Seneviratne LD (2013) Unified kinematics and singularity analysis of a metamorphic parallel mechanism with bifurcated motion. ASME J Mech Robot 5(3):041104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gan DM, Dai JS, Dias J, Seneviratne LD (2013) Reconfigurability and unified kinematics modeling of a 3rTPS metamorphic parallel mechanism with perpendicular constraint screws. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 29(4):121–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gan DM, Dias J, Seneviratne LD (2013) Unified inverse dynamics of variable topologies of a metamorphic parallel mechanism using screw theory. In: Proceeding of ASME 2013 IDETC, Portland, USA, August 4–7, 2013Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dongming Gan
    • 1
  • Jian S. Dai
    • 2
  • Jorge Dias
    • 1
    • 3
  • Lakmal Seneviratne
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Robotics InstituteKhalifa University of Science, Technology and ResearchAbu DhabiUAE
  2. 2.School of Natural and Mathematical Sciences, King’s College LondonUniversity of LondonLondonUK
  3. 3.Faculty of Science and TechnologyUniversity of CoimbraCoimbraPortugal

Personalised recommendations