Meccanica

, Volume 49, Issue 9, pp 2189–2206 | Cite as

A reaction–diffusion model for competing languages

New Trends in Fluid and Solid Mechanical Models

Abstract

The extinction of many of the world’s minority languages is of great concern as language death can lead to the irrevocable loss of cultural information. This often occurs through a process of language shift, where individuals switch from speaking one language to a different, more dominant, language. To prevent the loss of language, it is necessary to determine whether language loss is inevitable or if languages can coexist. We address this question by constructing a nonlinear system of reaction–diffusion equations to model the spread of two competing languages, u and v, which vary temporally and spatially. Language u is assumed to confer a relative status advantage to its speakers, thus individuals may convert from language v to language u. The four constant system equilibria are found. Instability and stability conditions are found for each equilibrium. We conclude that the coexistence of both languages u and v is globally stable, subject to certain constraints on the growth rate of each language and the initial values of both u and v.

Keywords

Language competition Reaction–diffusion Equilibria Nonlinear stability 

References

  1. 1.
    Abrams DM, Strogatz SH (2003) Modelling the dynamics of language death. Nature 424:900ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Abrams DM, Yaple HA, Wiener RJ (2011) Dynamics of social group competition: modeling the decline of religious affiliation. Phys Rev Lett 107:088701ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Aoki K, Shida M, Shigesada N (1996) Travelling wave solutions for the spread of farmers into a region occupied by hunter-gatherers. Theor Popul Biol 50:1–17CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bakalis E, Galani A (2012) Modeling language evolution: aromanian, an endangered language in Greece. Physica A 391(20):4963–4969ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Berti A, Bochicchio I, Fabrizio M (2014) Phase separation in quasi-incompressible fluids: Cahn-Hilliard model in the Cattaneo-Maxwell framework. Zeitschrift für angewandte Mathematik und Physik, pp 1–13Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brenzinger M (1992) Language death: factual and theoretical explorations with special reference to east Africa. Walter de Gruyter, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Catalan, Language of Europe. http://www20.gencat.cat/docs/Llengcat/Documents/Publicacions/Catala%20llengua%20Europa/Arxius/cat_europa_angles_07.pdf. Generalitat de Catalunya, Departament de la Vicepresidència, Secretaria de Política Lingüística
  8. 8.
    Capone F, De Luca R (2012) Ultimately boundedness and stability of triply diffusive mixtures in rotating porous layers under the action of Brinkman law. Int J Non Linear Mech 47(7):799–805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Capone F, De Luca R (2014) Coincidence between linear and global nonlinear stability of non-constant throughflows via the Rionero “Auxiliary System Method”. Meccanica. doi:10.1007/s11012-014-9920-2 Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Daghia F, Fabrizio M, Grandi D (2010) A non isothermal Ginzburg-Landau model for phase transitions in shape memory alloys. Meccanica 45:797–807CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fabrizio M, Mongiovì MS (2013) Phase transition and \(\lambda \)-line in liquid helium. J Non-Equilib Thermodyn 38:185–200CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fabrizio M, Mongiovì MS (2013) Phase transition in liquid 4He by a mean field model. J Therm Stress 36:135–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fabrizio M, Rivera JM Diffusive theory of migration and integration. In: Bissell JJ, Caiado CCS, Goldstein M, Straughan B (eds) Tipping points: modelling social problems and health. Wiley (in press) Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fishman JA (2001) Why is it so hard to save a threatened language? In: Fishman JA (ed) Can threatened languages be saved?. Multilingual Matters Ltd, ClevedonGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gilbarg D, Trudinger NS (1998) Elliptic partial differential equations of second order, 2nd edn. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Golla V (2011) California Indian languages. University of California Press, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Grenoble LA, Whaley LJ (2005) Saving languages: an introduction to language revitalization. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Harfash AJ, Straughan B (2012) Magnetic effect on instability and nonlinear stability in a reacting fluid. Meccanica. doi:10.1007/s11012-012-9558-x
  19. 19.
    Hickey R (ed) (2013) The handbook of language contact. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hill AA, Malashetty MS (2012) An operative method to obtain sharp nonlinear stability for systems with spatially dependent coefficients. Proc R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 468(2138):323–336ADSCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Idescat Linguistic Census. http://www.idescat.cat/en/poblacio/poblcensling.html, accessed Sept. 2013
  22. 22.
    Joseph DD (1965) On the stability of the Boussinesq equations. Arch Ration Mech Anal 20(1):59–71CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Joseph DD (1966) Nonlinear stability of the Boussinesq equations by the method of energy. Arch Ration Mech Anal 22(3):163–184CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Joseph DD (1970) Global stability of the conduction–diffusion solution. Arch Ration Mech Anal 36(4):285–292CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kandler A, Steele J (2008) Ecological models of language competition. Biol Theory 3:164–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kandler A, Unger R, Steele J (2010) Language shift, bilingualism and the future of Britain’s Celtic languages. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 365(1559):3855–3864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Minett JW, Wang WS-Y (2008) Modelling endangered languages: the effects of bilingualism and social structure. Lingua 118(1):19–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mira J, Paredes Á (2005) Interlinguistic similarity and language death dynamics. Europhys Lett 69(6):1031–1034ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mira J, Seoane LF, Nieto JJ (2011) The importance of interlinguistic similarity and stable bilingualism when two languages compete. N J Phys 13(3):033007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mulone G, Straughan B, Wang W (2007) Stability of epidemic models with evolution. Stud Appl Math 118(2):117–132CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Nettle D, Romaine S (2000) Vanishing voices: the extinction of the world’s languages. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Orr WM (1907) The stability or instability of the steady motions of a perfect liquid and of a viscous liquid. Part I a perfect liquid. Proc R Ir Acad Sect A Math Phys Sci 27:9–68Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Patriarca M, Leppänen T (2004) Modeling language competition. Physica A 338:296–299ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Pinasco JP, Romanelli L (2006) Coexistence of languages is possible. Physica A 361:355–360ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Rionero S (1967) Sulla stabilità asintotica in media in magnetoidrodinamica non isoterma. Ricerche di Matematica 16:250–263MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Rionero S (1968) Metodi variazionali per la stabilità asintotica in media in magnetoidrodinamica. Annali di Matematica Pura ed Applicata 78:339–364CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Rionero S (2009) L2-energy stability via new dependent variables for circumventing strongly nonlinear reaction terms. Nonlinear Anal Theory Methods Appl 70(7):2530–2541CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Rionero S (2012) Absence of subcritical instabilities and global nonlinear stability for porous ternary diffusive-convective fluid mixtures. Phys Fluids 24(10):104101ADSCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Rionero S (2014) “Cold convection” in porous layers salted from above. Meccanica. doi:10.1007/s11012-013-9870-0
  40. 40.
    Romaine S (2000) Language in society: an introduction to sociolinguistics. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Serrin J (1959) On the stability of viscous fluid motions. Arch Ration Mech Anal 3(1):1–13CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Steele J, Kandler A (2010) Language trees \(\ne \) gene trees. Theory Biosci 129:223–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Straughan B (2004) The energy method, stability and nonlinear convection. Springer, New YorkCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Straughan B (2013) Nonlinear stability for a simple model of a protoplanetary disc. Nonlinear Anal Real World Appl 17:23–32CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Tsunoda T (2006) Language endangerment and language revitalization: an introduction. Walter de Gruyter, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Vogt P (2009) Modeling Interactions between language evolution and demography. Hum Biol 81:237–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Wang W, Zhao X (2012) Basic reproduction numbers for reaction–diffusion epidemic models. SIAM J Appl Dyn Syst 11(4):1652–1673CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mathematical SciencesDurham UniversityDurhamUK

Personalised recommendations