Meccanica

, Volume 48, Issue 5, pp 1031–1051 | Cite as

On damage detection by continuous dynamic monitoring in wind-excited suspension bridges

Article

Abstract

The paper discusses the application of dynamic methods for damage detection in the main cables of suspension bridges, using data continuously recorded under wind excitation through permanent monitoring systems and automated operational modal analysis.

A continuum model for predicting the vertical aeroelastic response of wind-excited damaged suspension bridges is formulated and presented at first. The model shows that, for a real sample bridge, typical variations of mean wind speed produce variations of natural frequencies, due to aeroelastic effects, that are more significant than those produced by a small damage. A possible solution to this issue, proposed in the paper, consists of removing the dependence on the excitation source by calculating frequency shifts considering frequencies, in reference and damaged states, associated to approximately the same mean wind speed. This task and the necessary estimation of frequency shifts through a statistical analysis of identified natural frequencies outline the need for a continuous dynamic monitoring.

The analytical model is finally employed for generating dynamic wind response data that are successively processed by means of an advanced automated modal identification tool. Although based on the simplifications inherently contained in the analytical model, the results show that frequency shifts caused by a relatively small damage can be accurately estimated from response data recorded under wind excitation with a reasonable number of data sets.

Keywords

Suspension bridge Damage detection Continuous dynamic monitoring Automated modal identification Structural health monitoring 

References

  1. 1.
    Friswell MI (2007) Damage identification using inverse methods. Philos Trans R Soc Lond A 365:393–410 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Reynders E, Pintelon R, De Roek G (2008) Uncertainty bounds on modal parameters obtained from stochastic subspace identification. Mech Syst Signal Process 22:948–969 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Carden EP, Mita A (2011) Challenges in developing confidence intervals on modal parameters estimated for large civil infrastructure with stochastic subspace identification. Struct Control Health Monit 18:53–78 Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yuan Y, Liu H (2012) An iterative updating method for undamped structural systems. Meccanica 47:699–706 MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Perera R, Fang SE, Ruiz A (2010) Application of particle swarm optimization and genetic algorithms to multiobjective damage identification inverse problems with modelling errors. Meccanica 45:723–734 MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Breccolotti M, Franceschini G, Materazzi AL (2004) Sensitivity of dynamic methods for damage detection in structural concrete bridges. Shock Vib 11(3–4):383–394 Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Peeters B, De Roeck G (2001) One-year monitoring of the Z24-bridge: environmental effects versus damage events. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 30:149–171 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Li H, Li S, Ou J, Li H (2010) Modal identification of bridges under varying environmental conditions: temperature and wind effects. Struct Control Health Monit 17:495–512 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gentile C, Saisi A (2010) Dynamic assessment of the iron bridge at Paderno d’Adda (1889). Adv Mater Res 133–134:709–714 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gentile C, Saisi A (2011) Ambient vibration testing and condition assessment of the Paderno iron arch bridge (1889). Constr Build Mater 25(9):3709–3720 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Laermann KH (2010) Assessment of structural integrity and durability a task of experimental mechanics. Meccanica 45:167–174 MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Petrini F, Bontempi F (2011) Estimation of fatigue life for long span suspension bridge hangers under wind action and train transit. Struct Infrastruct Eng 7(7–8):491–507 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Betti R, West AC, Vermaas G, Cao Y (2005) Corrosion and embrittlement in high-strength wires of suspension bridge cables. J Bridge Eng 10(2):151–162 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cremona C (2003) A short note on cable fatigue. In: Proc. 5th international symposium on cable dynamics Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Breccolotti M, Gusella V, Materazzi AL (2007) Active displacement control of a wind-exposed mast. Struct Control Health Monit 14(4):556–575 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ubertini F (2008) Active feedback control for cable vibrations. Smart Struct Syst 4(4):407–428 Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Faravelli L, Fuggini C, Ubertini F (2010) Toward a hybrid control solution for cable dynamics: theoretical prediction and experimental validation. Struct Control Health Monit 17(4):386–403 Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Simiu E, Scanlan RH (1996) Wind effects on structures, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Scanlan RH (2000) Motion-related body-force functions in two-dimensional low-speed flow. J Fluids Struct 14:49–63 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Domaneschi M, Limongelli MP, Martinelli L (2011) Wind driven damage detection on a suspension bridge. In: Proceedings of the EVACES 2011 conference, Varenna, 3–5 October 2011 Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Materazzi AL, Ubertini F (2011) Eigenproperties of suspension bridges with damage. J Sound Vib 330:6420–6434 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lepidi M, Gattulli V, Vestroni F (2007) Static and dynamic response of elastic suspended cables with damage. Solids Struct 44:8194–8212 MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Irvine HM, Caughey TK (1974) The linear theory of free vibrations of suspended cables. Proc R Soc Lond 341:299–315 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Irvine HM (1981) Cable structures. MIT Press, Cambridge Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Luco JE, Turmo J (2010) Linear vertical vibrations of suspension bridges: a review of continuum models and some new results. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 30:769–781 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Carpineto N, Lacarbonara W, Vestroni F (2010) Mitigation of pedestrian-induced vibrations in suspension footbridges via multiple tuned mass dampers. J Vib Control 16(5):749–776 MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Carassale L, Solari G (2002) Wind modes for structural dynamics: a continuous approach. Probab Eng Mech 17:157–166 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gattulli V, Martinelli L, Perotti F, Vestroni F (2007) Dynamics of suspended cables under turbulence loading: reduced models of wind field and mechanical system. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 95:183–207 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Salvatori L, Spinelli P (2006) Effects of structural nonlinearity and along-span wind coherence on suspension bridge aerodynamics: some numerical simulation results. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 94:415–430 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ubertini F (2010) Prevention of suspension bridge flutter using multiple tuned mass dampers. Wind Struct 13(3):235–256 MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hong AL, Ubertini F, Betti R (2011) Wind analysis of a suspension bridge: identification and finite-element model simulation. ASCE J Struct Eng 137(1):133–142 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ubertini F, Gentile C, Materazzi AL (2013) Automated modal identification in operational conditions and its application to bridges. Eng Struct 46:264–278 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Gusella V, Materazzi AL (1998) Non-Gaussian response of MDOF wind-exposed structures: analysis by bicorrelation function and bispectrum. Meccanica 33(3):299–307 MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Jones NP, Scanlan RH (2001) Theory and full-bridge modeling of wind response of cable-supported bridges. J Bridge Eng 6(6):365–375 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Caracoglia L (2008) Influence of uncertainty in selected aerodynamic and structural parameters on the buffeting response of long-span bridges. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 96:327344 Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    The Mathworks Inc (2010) Matlab and Simulink, Natickm Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    SVS (2010) ARTeMIS Extractor 2010 release 5.0. http://www.svibs.com
  38. 38.
    Van Overschee P, De Moor B (1996) Subspace identification for linear systems: theory, implementation, application. Kluwer, Dordrecht CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Cantieni R (2005) Experimental methods used in system identification of civil engineering structures. In: Proceedings of the first international operational modal analysis conference (IOMAC’05) Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringUniversity of PerugiaPerugiaItaly

Personalised recommendations