, Volume 42, Issue 4, pp 359–364

The phenomenon of weight-reduction of a spinning wheel

Original Paper


An investigation has been conducted into the controversial phenomenon of weight-reduction of spinning wheels. When subjected to forced precession and controlled lifting, a spinning wheel does indeed lose 8% of its weight, as measured by a load-cell. That is, some of the gravitational potential energy acquired during lifting is supplied by the horizontal input force causing the enhanced precession. Consequently, the averaged vertical lifting force is less than Mg. The explanation for this phenomenon follows directly from the requirement of energy conservation throughout the process.


Gyroscopes Theory Mechanisms 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Laithwaite E (1994) “Heretics” BBC 2 Television, London; plus private demonstrationsGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kidd S, Thompson R (1990) Beyond 2001. Sidgwick and Jackson, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hayasaka H, Takeuchi S (1989) Anomalous weight- reduction on a gyroscope’s right rotations. Phys Rev Lett 63:2701–2704CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Adelberger EG (1990) Science correspondence on paper by Hayasaka & Takeuchi. Nature 345:121CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Faller JE et al (1990) Gyroscope-weighing experiment with a null result. Phys Rev Lett 64:825–826CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    MacCallum M (1990) Does a spinning mass really lose weight? New Scientist N1704:30Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nitschke JM, Wilmarth PA (1990) Null result for the weight change of a spinning gyroscope. Phys Rev Lett 64: 2115–2116CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Quinn TJ, Picard A (1990) The mass of spinning rotors. Nature 343:732–735CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Salter SH (1990) Good vibrations for physics. Nature 343:509–510CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Imanishi A et al (1991) Observations against the weight-reduction of spinning gyroscopes. J Phys Soc Japan 60:1150–1152CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    French AP (1971) Newtonian mechanics. W.W. Norton, NYMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Stephenson RJ (1960) Mechanics and properties of matter 2nd edn. J.Wiley, NY, p 230Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bergmann PG (1976) Introduction to the theory of relativity. Dover, NYGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ascot, BerkshireUK

Personalised recommendations