Metabolic Brain Disease

, Volume 34, Issue 1, pp 331–339 | Cite as

Fatty acids and selected endocannabinoids content in cerebrospinal fluids from patients with neuroinfections

  • Jacek Czepiel
  • Joanna Gdula-ArgasińskaEmail author
  • Grażyna Biesiada
  • Beata Bystrowska
  • Artur Jurczyszyn
  • William Perucki
  • Katarzyna Sroczyńska
  • Anna Zając
  • Tadeusz Librowski
  • Aleksander Garlicki
Open Access
Original Article


Neuroinfections are a significant medical problem and can have serious health consequences for patients. Their outcome, if not fatal, can be associated with permanent residual deficits. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) examination is commonly used for meningitis confirmation. Fatty acids (FA) are precursors of lipid mediators with pharmacological activity. They actively modulate inflammation as well as contribute to its resolution. Therefore the aim of this study was to determine the FA and selected endocannabinoids (ECB) content in the CSF obtained from patients with bacterial (BM) and viral meningitis (VM) using chromatographic techniques. A significantly lower level of saturated FA was found in patients with BM and VM as compared to controls. There was a significantly higher concentration of long-chain monounsaturated FA and polyunsaturated n-6 FA in the CSF obtained from patients with neuroinfection. Moreover, a significant reduction of n-3 FA in CSF obtained from patients with BM and VM was demonstrated. The highest amount of ECB was detected in the CSF of patients with VM: eicosapentaenoyl ethanolamide (1.65 pg/mL), docosahexaenoyl ethanolamide (655.5 pg/mL) and nervonoyl ethanolamide (3.09 ng/mL). Results indicate the participation of long-chain monounsaturated and polyunsaturated FA and their derivatives in the inflammatory process and likely in the process of resolution of inflammation during neuroinfection. It seems that the determination of the FA and ECB profile in CSF may be a valuable biomarker of health and may allow the development of new pharmacological strategies, therapeutic goals and fatty acids supplementation necessary in the fight against inflammation of the central nervous system.


Cerebrospinal fluid Inflammation Pathogenesis Fatty acids Endocannabinoids Neuroinfections 



arachidonic acid


adherent junctions


blood–brain barier


bacterial meningitis


central nervous system


cerebro-spinal fluid


C-reactive protein


docosahexaenoic fatty acid


docosahexaenoyl ethanolamide




eicosapentaenoic fatty acid


eicosapentaenoyl ethanolamide


fatty acids


Glasgow Outcome Scores


Glasgow Coma Scale


monounsaturated fatty acids


nervonoyl ethanolamide


polyunsaturated fatty acids


lower quartile


upper quartile


saturated fatty acids


tight junctions


viral meningitis


white blood cells


Despite progress in the prevention and treatment of infectious diseases, central nervous system (CNS) infections are a persistent problem in modern medicine. Neuroinfections account for significant worldwide morbidity and mortality, and are observed throughout the globe in every age group from neonates to older adults. They are characterized by a variety of symptoms ranging from fever and headaches to the most serious consequences including increased intracranial pressure and irreversible damage to the nervous system, which, if not fatal, can be associated with permanent residual deficits (Leibovitch and Jacobson 2016).

Fatty acids (FA) and their derivatives are important mediators in the human immune system. The intensity of the inflammatory process is influenced by changes in the metabolism of eicosanoids, endocannabinoids (ECB) and other lipid mediators (Stillwell and Wassall 2003; Shaikh and Edidin 2008; Serhan and Petasis 2011; Calder 2016).

CNS is an isolated place for infection, protected by the blood-brain barrier (BBB). The BBB provides structural as well as functional protection by maintaining homeostasis of the CNS microenvironment, protecting the nervous system against harmful factors, and also allowing selective transport of substances between blood and cerebro-spinal fluid (CSF). The BBB is therefore a barrier to pathogens, but also creates unique conditions for the operation of the host immune system. Selective BBB permeability is associated with a different structure of the capillary endothelium, forming a physical barrier. Endothelial cells are connected with each other through adherens junctions (AJs) and tight junctions (TJs), which have no gaps or pores, therefore substances present in the plasma can overcome the endothelium barrier only by means of transcellular transport (Ballabh et al. 2004; Nakagawa et al. 2009; van Sorge and Doran 2012).

The few studies of FA concentration in human CSF concerned only cases of strokes and brain injuries (Pilitsis et al. 2001, 2003a, b). The concept of these studies resulted from the previously shown significant increases of FA during pathological processes in nervous system, mainly ischemia in animal studies (Yasuda et al. 1985; Abe et al. 1987; Yoshida et al. 1980). Pilitsis et al. (2003a) assessed concentrations of arachidonic, docosahexaenoic, linoleic, myristic, oleic and palmitic acids in CSF from patients with ischemic and primary intracerebral hemorrhagic stroke (Pilitsis et al. 2003a). The concentrations of all studied FA were significantly greater than in control patients. Moreover, the higher concentration of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) significantly correlated with the worse Glasgow Coma Scale (GSC) score on admission and with the final outcome of stroke (Pilitsis et al. 2003a). Similar results were obtained by the authors who compared FA in people with traumatic brain injury compared to healthy people, the concentrations of arachidonic, DHA, myristic, oleic, palmitic, linoleic were significantly greater among patients with brain injury. There were no significant differences in FA concentration depending on Glasgow Outcome Scores (GOS), however, in patients who had early clinical improvement, AA, DHA and linoleic acids were significantly lower than in patients with worse outcome ratings. Pilitsis et al. (2003b) suggested that concentrations of FA may be useful as predictive markers of outcome in traumatic brain injury patients (Pilitsis et al. 2003b). Similar results for FA after brain injuries were observed in rat studies (Homayoun et al. 2000).

So far, the role of FA and their derivatives in the course of infection has been demonstrated (Shaikh and Edidin 2008; Tiesset et al. 2009; Czepiel et al. 2016), but there are no studies assessing this effect during neuroinfection. Moreover, the concentration of FA and ECB in neuroinfections was never directly assessed in the material taken from the CNS.

Taking this into account, the aim of our work was to assess the FA and ECB content in CSF during various etiologies of infection of the nervous system.

Materials and methods


The study group included 57 patients: 19 patients with bacterial meningitis (BM) (6 women and 13 men), 19 patients with viral meningitis (VM) (9 women and 10 men), and 19 patients (8 women and 11 men) in whom meningitis was excluded, who were hospitalized at the Department of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, Jagiellonian University Hospital in Krakow, Poland. All patients had signed a filled informed consent to participate in the examination.

The diagnosis of meningitis was based on history, physical examination and laboratory testing. Meningitis was confirmed or excluded after CSF examination, in which cytosis and the level of protein, glucose and white blood cells (WBC) were assed. Blood tests included WBC with differential leukocyte count and C-reactive protein (CRP), the tests were performed according to generally accepted standard methods. Moreover, each sample of CSF underwent microbiological assessment. Exclusion criteria included any other acute or chronic inflammatory diseases. Samples from each group were obtained from lumbar punctures for medically indicated reasons. All samples came from CSF left over in the main laboratory. Blood tests, demographic and clinical information were recorded using standardized data collection forms. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki 1975, and approved by the Jagiellonian University Ethics Committee (approval no 1072.6120.52.2018).

Lipid extraction

One mL of CSF were acidified with 50 μL of 0.01% formic acid (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Ten microliter of 0.001% butylated dihydroxytoluene (BHT, Sigma-Aldrich) was added to prevent lipid oxidation. Lipids were extracted with chloroform–methanol solution (2:1 v/v) (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). Two microliters of internal standards were used throughout: eicosapentaenoyl ethanolamide (EPEA-d4) and docosahexaenoyl ethanolamide (DHEA-d4), at concentration 10 μg/mL (Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, MI, USA). Samples were vortexed for 30 s and centrifuged for 10 min at 1000 x g. Organic phases were collected and dried under a stream of nitrogen. The residue was dissolved in 40 μL of acetonitrile (Merck).

Fatty acid analysis

The synthesis of fatty acid methyl esters (FAME) was carried out with 14% BF3 in methanol. FAME were analyzed using gas chromatography (Agilent 6890 N, Agilent Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) with a J&W DB-23 (60 m, ID 0.25 mm, 0.25 μm) column, as described earlier (Gdula-Argasińska et al. 2016; Gdula-Argasińska and Bystrowska 2016). FAME were identified according to standards (Sigma–Aldrich). The data were analyzed using ChemStation. Results were expressed as relative percentages of the sum of saturated (SFA), monounsaturated (MUFA), n-3 and n-6 FA.

LC-MS/MS conditions

Liquid chromatography was performed using an Agilent 1100 LC system (Agilent Technologies, Waldbronn, Germany). Chromatographic separation was carried out with a Thermo Scientific BDS HYPERSIL C18 column (100 × 3 mm I.D., 3 μm particle size). The advance column, with its pre-column (100 × 3 mm I.D., 3 μm particle size), was set at 40 °C with a mobile phase flow rate of 0.3 mL/min. The gradient elution mobile phases consisted of formic acid (0.02 mol/L) in acetonitrile and formic acid (0.02 mol/L) in water. MS/MS analyzes were performed on an Applied Biosystems MDS Sciex (Concord, Ontario, Canada) API 2000 triple quadruple mass spectrometer equipped with an electrospray ionization (ESI) interface. ESI ionization was performed in positive ionization mode. The multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode of the dominant product ion for each ECBs was used. A comparison of the paired ion (precursor and product ion m/z values) and LC retention times with standards served to confirm the identification of ECBs in the samples. Arachidonoyl ethanolamine (AEA), AEA-d4, 2-ariachonoylglycerol (2-AG), eicosapentaenoyl ethanolamide (EPEA), EPEA-d4, docosahexaenoyl ethanolamide (DHEA), DHEA-d4 and nervonoyl ethanolamide (NEA) standards were purchased from Cayman Chemical. An ion pair was 348 > 62 for AEA, 379 > 269 for 2-AG, 346 > 62 for EPEA, 372 > 62 for DHEA, 409 > 62 for NEA, 350 > 62 for EPEA-d4 and 376 > 66 for DHEA-d4. Data acquisition and processing were performed using Applied Biosystems Analyst version 1.4.2 software as described previously (Gdula-Argasińska and Bystrowska 2016).


All data are presented as means ± standard deviation (SD) or medians and lower (Q25) and upper (Q75) quartiles. Normal distribution of variables was checked using the Levene test. Differences between study groups were determined using the one-way ANOVA and Scheffe post hoc test, or Kruskal-Wallis test if normality was not observed. Analysis of similarities between content of the FA in CSF of studied groups was performed using clustering methods to identify homogenous groups of cases. Ward’s method with Euclidean distance matrix was used to join objects into clusters such that the variance within a cluster is minimized and to maximize the significance of differences between clusters. Calculations were performed using STATISTICA 13 (StatSoft Inc., Tulsa, OK, USA), and statistical significance was defined as p ≤ 0.05.


Markers of inflammation

Biochemical tests show significant differences between the analyzed groups in the areas of CRP, WBC and CSF parameters. Patients with BM were characterized by the highest values ​​of markers of inflammation and lowering of glucose in CSF. In the group of people with VM the markers of inflammation were slightly raised, and the glucose concentration in CSF was normal. Patients in the control group, as predicted, were characterized by correct values ​​of the parameters analyzed (Table 1).
Table 1

Comparison of WBC, CRP and biochemical CSF parameters in the analyzed groups. Medians, lower and upper quartiles, n = 19


BM (group 1)

VM (group 2)

Control group (group 3)








CRP [mg/L]







1vs2 = 0.000

1vs3 = 0.04

2vs3 = 0.000

WBC [×103/μL]







1vs2 = 0.005

1vs3 = 0.01

2vs3 = 0.000

CSF pleocytosis [count /μL]







1vs2 = 0.000

1vs3 = 0.000

2vs3 = 0.000

CSF protein [g/L]







1vs2 = 0.000

1vs3 = 0.005

2vs3 = 0.000

CSF glucose [mmol/L]







1vs2 = 0.000

1vs3 = 0.02

2vs3 = 0.000

BM bacterial meningitis, CRP C-reactive protein, CSF cerebro-spinal fluid, Q25 lower quartile, Q75 upper quartile, VM viral meningitis, WBC white blood cells

Fatty acids content in CSF

FA composition in patients with neuroinfections and controls are shown in Table 2. The saturated fatty acids (SFA) index in CSF from VM patients (30.7%) was statistically lower than in BM patients (35.01%), and also when compared to control (39.14%). The monounsaturated fatty acid (MUFA) index in CSF from controls was significantly higher (35.51%) than both BM (24.52%) and VM (26.46%). We noticed changes among n-3 and n-6 ​​FA. Total n-3 FA were significantly decreased, and total n-6 FA were significantly increased in the CSF of patients with meningitis compared to healthy persons. The CSF n-3/n-6 ratio was significantly decreased (more than three-fold) in meningitis patients compared to the control group (Table 2). There was no significant difference in FA between BM and VM groups. The general trend of changes in both groups with neuroinfection was both the same and with similar intensity. We did not show statistically significant differences between the BM and VM groups in the n-3 FA, n-6 FA and n-3/n-6 ratio. An increase in monounsaturated and polyunsaturated n-3 long-chain FA in the CSF obtained from patients with neuroinfection was observed. In patients with VM, the amount of linoleic acid increased more than 2.5 times, while in patients with BM there was statistically significant increase (three times) in the content of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA, C22: 6 n-3) in CSF.
Table 2

Fatty acid content [%] in cerebrospinal fluid from healthy, bacterial and viral meningitis. Means ± SD; n = 19






2.28# ± 0.36

1.15* ±0.26

1.64 ± 0.26


5.43# ± 1.14

3.51#,* ± 0.83

1.70 ± 0.83


2.72# ± 0.71

1.26#,* ± 0.51

5.67 ± 0.51


2.10 ± 0.46

1.94 ± 0.34

2.74 ± 0.34


8.27# ± 1.27

9.72 ± 0.92

12.28 ± 0.92


13.31 ± 1.94

12.66# ± 1.41

17.96 ± 1.41


0.91# ± 0.38

0.52* ±0.27

0.30 ± 0.27


35.01 ± 6.27

30.70#,* ± 4.55

39.14 ± 4.55


1.95# ± 0.40

2.20# ± 0.29

0.16 ± 0.29


1.43# ± 0.39

1.99* ±0.29

2.18 ± 0.29

C18:1 n-9

19.07# ± 2.80

21.35# ± 2.03

32.75 ± 2.03


1.07# ± 0.36

0.52#,* ± 0.26

0.26 ± 0.00


0.34# ± 0.11

0.19#,* ± 0.08

0.08 ± 0.00


0.66# ± 0.12

0.21#,* ± 0.09

0.09 ± 0.00


24.52# ± 4.17

26.46# ± 3.03

35.51 ± 2.61

C18:1n-9 t

3.33# ± 1.15

0.72* ±0.84

0.72 ± 0.84

C18:2n-6 t

0.51 ± 0.25

0.47# ± 0.18

0.78 ± 0.18


3.84# ± 1.41

1.19 ± 1.02

1.50 ± 1.02


2.63# ± 0.71

4.34* ±0.52

5.03 ± 0.52


5.00# ± 2.89

12.40#,* ± 2.09

2.09 ± 0.26


3.22# ± 1.32

2.85# ± 0.96

0.96 ± 0.05


4.58# ± 1.21

2.96#,* ± 0.88

0.60 ± 0.88


5.51 ± 1.26

5.38 ± 0.92

4.99 ± 0.92


9.51# ± 2.60

8.07# ± 1.89

0.11 ± 1.89


30.46# ± 10.00

35.99# ± 7.25

13.78 ± 4.52


2.02# ± 0.72

2.00# ± 0.52

3.32 ± 0.52


0.80 ± 0.44

0.79 ± 0.32

0.99 ± 0.32


2.30# ± 0.66

2.52# ± 0.48

5.42 ± 0.48


1.04# ± 0.37

0.36* ±0.27

0.34 ± 0.27


6.16# ± 2.20

5.67# ± 1.60

10.07 ± 1.60


0.20# ± 0.02

0.22# ± 0.06

0.73 ± 0.15

BM bacterial meningitis, FA fatty acids, MUFA monounsaturated fatty acids, SFA saturated fatty acids, VM viral meningitis; #p < 0.01 vs. control, *p < 0.01 vs. BM

To determine the covariant behavior of the measured variables, we analyzed such variables to identify which one best discriminates the FA profile in CSF from healthy people and patients with BM and VM (Fig. 1a–c). Variables were separated into three unique clusters. In healthy patients, CSF cluster 1 consisted of SFA (C8:0, C10:0, C12:0, C14:0) and C16:1 as well as C18:3 n-3, EPA and C18:2 n-6 and arachidonic acid (AA, C20:4 n-6). Cluster 2 consisted of a long chain of MUFA (C22:1 and C24:1), trans FA (C18:1 t, C18:2 t), C24:0, DHA and n-6 ​​FA (18:3 n-6, 20:3 n-6). In contrast, variants 16:0, 18:0, and 18:1 grouped further away (Fig. 1a).
Fig. 1

Cluster analysis of the FA profile in CSF from healthy people (a) and from patients with bacterial (b) and viral malignance (c). Data were segregated into three unique clusters of variables by hierarchical cluster analysis

In patients with BM, in contrast to the control, grouping of n-3 FA in the first cluster consisted of the following variants: 18:2 n-6, 18:3 n-3, EPA, DHA and saturated fatty acids C8:0, C12:0, C14:0 as well as long chain monounsaturated FA. n-6 and trans FA variants dominated in the second cluster (C18:3 n-6, C20:2 n-6, C20:3 n-6, AA and C22:6 n-6. In cluster 3, we noted grouping of C18:0 and C18:1 FA (Fig. 1b). In CSF from patients with VM in the cluster 1 long chain FA were present (C20:3 n-3, C22:1, C24:1, C24:0, C22:6 n-6, C20:1) as well as saturated FA (C8:0 and C12:0). Cluster 2 consists of SFA (C10:0, C14:0), MUFA (C14:1, C16:1), C18:3 n-3 as well as n-6 FA (C18:2 n-6, C20:3 n-6 and AA). In the cluster 3 the following FA were present: C16:0, C18:0, C18:1 and n-6 FA (C18:3 n-6, C22:6 n-6) (Fig. 1 c).

Endocannabinoids content

Arachidonoyl ethanloamide and 2-ariachonoylglycerol was not detected in CSF of all groups. Statistically the highest concentration of EPEA (1.65 pg/mL), DHEA (655 pg/mL) and NEA (3.09 ng/mL) were detected in CSF from VM patients when compared to control (Table 3). In the samples from BM patients the ECB concentrations were lower than in VM, but significant differences were observed only for DHEA content (Table 3).
Table 3

Endocannabinoids content in CSF of BM, VM patients and healthy control. Medians, lower and upper quartiles, n = 19


BM (group 1)

VM (group 2)

Control group (group 3)








EPEA [pg/mL]







2vs3 = 0.01

DHEA [pg/mL]







1vs2 = 0.002

2vs3 = 0.000

NEA [ng/mL]







2vs3 = 0.022


In our study for the first time we showed significant changes in the composition of fatty acids and endocannabinoids in the course of neuroinfections of various etiologies. Until now, the assessment of FA composition in CSF has been evaluated in few studies, but the evaluation has never been carried out in the course of neuroinfection. It was not known whether FA as well as ECB in the CNS during infection play a similar role as has been shown during infection in other parts of the body. Our study again demonstrates the important role of FA and their derivatives in the course of central nervous system pathology. There are hypothetically two mechanisms which could explain the changes in CSF composition observed in our study.

Fatty acids contribute to the systemic and local immune response

Polyunsaturated fatty acids are essential for brain homeostasis and functions and are the main components of neuronal membranes (Kong et al. 2011; Calder 2016). FA metabolism may be an important mechanism underlying rapid neuroinflammation in pathologic processes such as neuroinfections.

The first mechanism would result from the fact that FA contribute to the systemic and local immune response triggered by pathogens that reached the CNS, as such changes in FA as well as in ECB in CSF would be a reflection of the ongoing inflammatory process in the CNS. In our study, we showed a significant increase in n-6 FA in the course of neuroinfection compared to the control group, this effect occurred regardless of etiology. The strongest increase of n-6 FA, mainly C18:3 (gamma-linolenic acid, GLA), C20:2 (dihomo-gamma linolenic acid, DGLA), C20:3, C20:4 (arachidonic acid, AA) and C22:2 (adrenic acid) was observed in CSF from VM patients. DGLA, which is product of GLA conversion by elongase 5 (ELOVL5), can be enzymatically transformed to several metabolites with anti-inflammatory properties (Sergeant et al. 2016). DGLA may be also a precursor of arachidonic acid (AA). As a result of AA enzymatic oxidation, prostaglandins, leukotrienes, and lipoxins are formed and may generally promote inflammation (Serhan and Petasis 2011; Norris and Dennis 2014). Results obtained in our study suggest that n-6 FA significantly attenuate in an neuro-inflammatory responses. We also observed cluster characteristic grouping of n-6 fatty acids in patients with BM and VM. Similar to the changes in the n-6 FA in both neuroinfection groups, there was a decrease in n-3 FA in CSF in relation to healthy people. The strongest decrease was observed in the precursor for n-3 FA: linolenic acid (ALA, C18:3 n- 3) and in eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA, C20:5 n-3). The deficit of n-3 FA in cerebrospinal fluid from patiens with neuroinfections when compared to the control was seen also after cluster analysis. ALA is a precursor for n-3 series, including EPA or DHA, they show strong anti-inflammatory effects (Gdula-Argasińska et al. 2016; Wysoczański et al. 2016). Inflammation is an important element of the body’s fight with infection, however, the body also has effective mechanisms to quench the inflammatory reaction. The lack of such a mechanism and an excessive pro-inflammatory reaction would pose a significant threat to the homeostasis of the body. The process of resolution of inflammation itself does not have an immunosuppressive character, as several pro-resolving mediators increase survival from different infections. n-3 FA are one of the elements of such extinguishing, hence the observation in our study. A reflection of the changes in the n-6 and n-3 FA is more than three-fold reduction of n-3/n-6 ratio, this effect was observed for both types of neuroinfections studied.

The changed FA profile in CSF appears to be caused by the synthesis of lipid mediators, including eicosanoids, generated during inflammation by microglia and astrocyte cells. These changes may also be related to the biosynthesis of endocannabinoids, as well as being the result of a diversified expression of genes involved in the synthesis, elongation and desaturation of FA during the inflammatory process (Serhan and Petasis 2011; Gdula-Argasińska et al. 2016). Endocannabinoids are lipid mediators which play an important physiological role via cannabinoid receptor (CB1 and CB2) activation and signalling. Both DHEA and EPEA have anti-inflammatory properties and have been detected in both the brain and retina (Gdula-Argasińska and Bystrowska 2016; Wysoczański et al. 2016; McDougle et al. 2017). In our study we observed the highest content of DHAE, EPEA and NEA in the CSF of patients with VM. In samples from BM patients the ECB level was lower. ECB synthesis during neuroinfection is probably one of the mechanisms by which inflammation is resolved.

The dense clustering of the different cell types during inflammation presents a unique situation for lipid handling. In contrast to the synthesis of protein mediators (cytokines), lipid mediators can be produced along enzyme pathways that involve multiple cells, including microglia, in a process known as trans-cellular biosynthesis (Serhan and Petasis 2011; Norris and Dennis 2014; Johnson 2015). The inflamed tissue becomes a specialized organ for lipid metabolism, producing the types and amounts of lipid mediators needed to promote or resolve inflammation. However, the higher content of long-chain MUFA and PUFA in CSF obtained from patients with BM and VM may be correlated with higher expression of stearoyl-coenzyme A desaturase (SCD1) as well as elongases (Gdula-Argasińska and Bystrowska 2016; Sergeant et al. 2016).

Changes in fatty acids in CSF as a consequents of BBB permeability

The second mechanism which may explain the results observed in our study is passive FA penetration from the plasma through the damaged BBB as a result of the neuroinfection. Under physiological conditions, the BBB provides effective protection of the nervous system from external factors. The transcellular transport across the BBB involves diffusion and active transport with the use of carrier membrane proteins. The diffusion process transports mainly small-molecule nutrients and fat-soluble substances. Peptides and regulatory proteins as well as protein hormones penetrate the BBB via active transport with protein carriers. The transported substances are not transmitted directly to neurons, but to glial pellets. The astrocyte protrusions cover about 90% of the surface of the capillary walls. These cells constitute the second component, also crucial for the effectiveness of the physical barrier. They are links between the capillary wall and neurons (Ballabh et al. 2004; Nakagawa et al. 2009). The exact characteristics of the BBB are presented in review by Sorge et al. (van Sorge and Doran 2012).

CSF is a secretion of the choroid plexuses located in the wall of the cerebral ventricles and periventricular organs. The transport of substances from the blood to CSF ​​is very selective, because glial cells (tanycetes) adhere to the endothelium and functions to assist in taking certain substances (eg. hormones) from the blood and transferring them to the CSF, as well as in the opposite direction (Lossinsky and Shivers 2004). BBB permeability disorders have been described in various neurological diseases, including inflammatory, infectious, neurodegenerative and neoplastic diseases. A special group of diseases that change the physiological properties of BBB include neuroinfections. Under physiological conditions, there is little infiltration of T-lymphocytes and monocytes through the BBB, the situation changes during infectious processes involving the nervous system, during which an increased transmission of cells of the immune system across the BBB is observed (Weiss et al. 2009). Impaired integrity of the BBB is one of the key factors in BM pathogenesis and is also extremely important for the development of VM. This may be due to the toxic effect of pathogens, their products or through the ability to interact with BBB structures, mainly AJs and TJs. For example, group B Streptococcus (GBS) and Streptococcus pneumoniae directly affect BBB by producing spore-forming toxins (Nizet et al. 1997; Zysk et al. 2001; Lembo et al. 2010). As GBS produce more toxins, they are more apt to cause BM (Doran et al. 2003). Many viruses damage the cytoskeletal actin during their life cycle (Taylor et al. 2011). In addition, in the course of induced neuroinfections with various etiologies of the immune reaction, cytokines/chemokines molecules are produced that may interfere with the functioning of the BBB, which in turn facilitates the development of neuroinfections and is associated with worsening the prognosis of such patients (van Sorge and Doran 2012). An example is the increase in systemic expression of TNF-α, which translates into an increase in BBB permeability (Sharief et al. 1992). Thus, with the BBB’s excess permeability increasing in the course of neuroinfection, FA could passively pass into CSF.

In our study, there was no significant difference in majority FA between BM and VM groups. But the general trend of changes in both groups with neuroinfection was both the same and with similar intensity. Significant differences were demonstrated for LA, GLA and DHA content.

In conclusion, FA are an important element of the inflammatory reaction in the course of neuroinfection, as demonstrated by the significant increase in n-6 FA and decrease in n-3 FA as well as significant increase of EPEA, DHEA in CSF during neuroinfections of various etiology in relation to healthy people. A limit of our study was that patients were not supplemented with PUFA, therefore it seems necessary to consider this area in the future.

The process of resolution of inflammation, so important to the health of the patient, is still not fully understood. Therefore, the description of fatty acid impaired metabolism in the course of neuroinfection appears to be an important issue. It may allow, inter alia, to develop new pharmacological strategies, therapeutic aims and modern drugs, essential in the fight against neuroinfections. It appears that fatty acids and their metabolites, which are ligands for peroxisome proliferator receptors (PPARs) and nuclear factor kappa B (NF-ĸB) transcription factors (Gdula-Argasińska and Bystrowska 2016; Qasem et al. 2018) may be used as nutraceuticals in the regulation of brain immune response.



This study was supported by Statutory activity of Jagiellonian University Medical College (no K/ZDS/006216).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.


  1. Abe K, Kogure K, Yamamoto H, Imazawa M, Miyamoto K (1987) Mechanism of arachidonic acid liberation during ischemia in gerbil cerebral cortex. J Neurochem 48:503–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ballabh P, Braun A, Nedergaard M (2004) The blood-brain barrier: an overview: structure, regulation, and clinical implications. Neurobiol Dis 16:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Calder PC (2016) Docosahexaenoic acid. Ann Nutr Metab 69:7–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Czepiel J, Gdula-Argasińska J, Aleksander G (2016) n-3 and n-6 fatty acid changes in the erythrocyte membranes of patients with Clostridium difficile infection. Folia Biol (Kraków) 64:3–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Doran KS, Liu GY, Nizet V (2003) Group B streptococcal beta-hemolysin/cytolysin activates neutrophil signaling pathways in brain endothelium and contributes to development of meningitis. J Clin Invest 112:736–744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gdula-Argasińska J, Bystrowska B (2016) Docosahexaenoic acid attenuates in endocannabinoid synthesis in RAW 264.7 macrophages activated with benzo(a)pyrene and lipopolysaccharide. Toxicol Lett 258:93–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gdula-Argasińska J, Czepiel J, Totoń-Żurańska J, Wołkow P, Librowski T, Czapkiewicz A, Perucki W, Woźniakiewicz M, Woźniakiewicz A (2016) N-3 fatty acids regulate the inflammatory-state related genes in the lung epithelial cells exposed to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Pharmacol Rep 68:319–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Homayoun R, Parkins NE, Soblosky J, Carey ME, Rodriguez de Turco EG, Bazan NG (2000) Cortical impact injury in rats promotes a rapid and sustained increase in polyunsaturated free fatty acids and diacylglycerols. Neurochem Res 25:269–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Johnson RW (2015) Feeding the beast: can microglia in the senescent brain be regulated by diet? Brain Behav Immun 43:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kong W, Yen J-H, Ganea D (2011) Docosahexaenoic acid prevents dendritic cell maturation, inhibits antigen-specific Th1/Th17 differentiation and suppresses experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Brain Behav Immun 25(5):872–882CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Leibovitch EC, Jacobson S (2016) Vaccinations for neuroinfectious disease: a global health priority. Neurotherapeutics 13:562–570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lembo A, Gurney MA, Burnside K, Banerjee A, de los Reyes M, Connelly JE, Lin WJ, Jewell KA, Vo A, Renken CW, Doran KS, Rajagopal L (2010) Regulation of CovR expression in group B Streptococcus impacts blood–brain barrier penetration. Mol Microbiol 77:431–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lossinsky AS, Shivers RR (2004) Structural pathways for macromolecular and cellular transport across the blood-brain barrier during inflammatory conditions. Review Histol Histopathol 19:535–564PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. McDougle DR, Watson JE, Abdeen AA, Adili R, Caputo MP, Krapf JE, Johnson RW, Kilian KA, Holinstat M (2017) Anti-inflammatory ω-3 endocannabinoid epoxides. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114:E6034–E6043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Nakagawa S, Deli MA, Kawaguchi H, Shimizudani T, Shimono T, Kittel A, Tanaka K, Niwa M (2009) A new blood-brain barrier model using primary rat brain endothelial cells, pericytes and astrocytes. Neurochem Int 54:253–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Nizet V, Kim KS, Stins M, Jonas M, Chi EY, Nguyen D, Rubens CE (1997) Invasion of brain microvascular endothelial cells by group B streptococci. Infect Immun 65:5074–5081PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Norris PC, Dennis EA (2014) A lipidomic perspective on inflammatory macrophage eicosanoid signaling. Adv Biol Regul 54:99–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pilitsis JG, Diaz FG, Wellwood JM, O’Regan MH, Fairfax MR, Phillis JW, Coplin WM (2001) Quantification of free fatty acids in human cerebrospinal fluid. Neurochem Res 26:1265–1270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pilitsis JG, Coplin WM, O’Regan MH, Wellwood JM, Diaz FG, Fairfax MR, Michael DB, Phillis JW (2003a) Measurement of free fatty acids in cerebrospinal fluid from patients with hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke. Brain Res 985:198–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pilitsis JG, Coplin WM, O’Regan MH, Wellwood JM, Diaz FG, Fairfax MR, Michael DB, Phillis JW (2003b) Free fatty acids in cerebrospinal fluids from patients with traumatic brain injury. Neurosci Lett 349:136–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Qasem H, Al-Ayadhi L, Bjørklund G, Chirumbolo S, El-Ansary A (2018) Impaired lipid metabolism markers to assess the risk of neuroinflammation in autism spectrum disorder. Metab Brain Dis 33(4):1141–1153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sergeant S, Rahbar E, Chilton FH (2016) Gamma-linolenic acid, dihommo-gamma linolenic, eicosanoids and inflammatory processes. Eur J Pharmacol 785:77–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Serhan CN, Petasis NA (2011) Resolvins and protectins in inflammation resolution. Chem Rev 111:5922–5943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Shaikh SR, Edidin M (2008) Polyunsaturated fatty acids and membrane organization: the balance between immunotherapy and susceptibility to infection. Chem Phys Lipids 153:24–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sharief MK, Ciardi M, Thompson EJ (1992) Blood–brain barrier damage in patients with bacterial meningitis: association with tumor necrosis factor-alpha but not interleukin-1 beta. J Infect Dis 166:350–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Stillwell W, Wassall SR (2003) Docosahexaenoic acid: membrane properties of a unique fatty acid. Chem Phys Lipids 126:1–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Taylor MP, Koyuncu OO, Enquist LW (2011) Subversion of the actin cytoskeleton during viral infection. Nat Rev Microbiol 9:427–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tiesset H, Pierre M, Desseyn JL, Guery B, Beermann C, Galabert C, Gottrand F, Husson MO (2009) Dietary (n-3) polyunsaturated fatty acids affect the kinetics of pro- and antiinflammatory responses in mice with Pseudomonas aeruginosa lung infection. J Nutr 139:82–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. van Sorge NM, Doran KS (2012) At the border: the blood–brain barrier versus bacterial foreigners. Future Microbiol 7:383–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Weiss N, Miller F, Cazaubon S, Couraud PO (2009) The blood-brain barrier in brain homeostasis and neurological diseases. Biochim Biophys Acta 1788:842–857CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wysoczański T, Sokoła-Wysoczańska E, Pękala J, Lochyński S, Czyż K, Bodkowski R, Herbinger G, Patkowska-Sokoła B, Librowski T (2016) Omega-3 fatty acids and their role in central nervous system - a review. Curr Med Chem 23(8):816–831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Yasuda H, Kishiro K, Izumi N, Nakanishi M (1985) Biphasic liberation of arachidonic and stearic acids during cerebral ischemia. J Neurochem 45:168–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Yoshida S, Inoh S, Asano T, Sano K, Kubota M, Shimazaki H, Ueta N (1980) Effect of transient ischemia on free fatty acids and phospholipids in the gerbil brain. Lipid peroxidation as a possible cause of post-ischemic injury. J Neurosurg 53:323–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Zysk G, Schneider-Wald BK, Hwang JH, Bejo L, Kim KS, Mitchell TJ, Hakenbeck R, Heinz HP (2001) Pneumolysin is the main inducer of cytotoxicity to brain microvascular endothelial cells caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae. Infect Immun 69:845–852CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jacek Czepiel
    • 1
  • Joanna Gdula-Argasińska
    • 2
    Email author
  • Grażyna Biesiada
    • 1
  • Beata Bystrowska
    • 3
  • Artur Jurczyszyn
    • 4
  • William Perucki
    • 5
  • Katarzyna Sroczyńska
    • 2
  • Anna Zając
    • 2
  • Tadeusz Librowski
    • 2
  • Aleksander Garlicki
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Infectious and Tropical DiseasesJagiellonian University Medical CollegeKrakowPoland
  2. 2.Department of Radioligands, Faculty of PharmacyJagiellonian University Medical CollegeKrakowPoland
  3. 3.Chair of Toxicology, Faculty of PharmacyJagiellonian University Medical CollegeKrakowPoland
  4. 4.Department of HematologyJagiellonian University Medical CollegeKrakowPoland
  5. 5.Department of Medicine, John Dempsey HospitalUniversity of ConnecticutFarmingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations