Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of antioxidant enzyme system in human population exposed to radiation from mobile towers
In the present era, cellular phones have changed the life style of human beings completely and have become an essential part of their lives. The number of cell phones and cell towers are increasing in spite of their disadvantages. These cell towers transmit radiation continuously without any interruption, so people living within 100s of meters from the tower receive 10,000 to 10,000,000 times stronger signal than required for mobile communication. In the present study, we have examined superoxide dismutase (SOD) enzyme activity, catalase (CAT) enzyme activity, lipid peroxidation assay, and effect of functional polymorphism of SOD and CAT antioxidant genes against mobile tower-induced oxidative stress in human population. From our results, we have found a significantly lower mean value of manganese superoxide dismutase (MnSOD) enzyme activity, catalase (CAT) enzyme activity, and a high value of lipid peroxidation assay in exposed as compared to control subjects. Polymorphisms in antioxidant MnSOD and CAT genes significantly contributed to its phenotype. In the current study, a significant association of genetic polymorphism of antioxidant genes with genetic damage has been observed in human population exposed to radiations emitted from mobile towers.
KeywordsAntioxidant gene polymorphism Electromagnetic fields (EMFs) Mobile tower base stations Oxidative stress Reactive oxygen species
We are thankful to the Science and Engineering Research Board, Department of Science and Technology (DST), New Delhi, India for funding through Grant No. SR/FT/LS-146/2011 and to all blood donors for their voluntary participation in our study.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
The research protocol was approved by the institutional human ethics committee of Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra (Haryana).
Informed consent was obtained from all subjects.
- 4.Bandyopadhyay U, Das D, Banerjee RK (2000) Reactive oxygen species: oxidative and pathogenesis. Current Sci 77:658–666Google Scholar
- 7.Furtado-Filho OV, Borba JB, Dallegrave A, Pizzolato TM, Henriques JA, Moreira JC, Saffi J (2013) Effect of 950 MHz UHF electromagnetic radiation on biomarkers of oxidative damage, metabolism of UFA and antioxidants in the livers of young rats of different ages. Int J Radiat Biol 119(2):159–168Google Scholar
- 10.Sikka SC (1999) Testicular toxicology in endocrine and hormonal toxicology. In: Harvey P, Cock Burn A (eds). Chap 5, Wiley, West Sussex, pp 91–110Google Scholar
- 15.Salvatore C, Adriana MS, Giuseppe MC, Angela D, Angela A, Maria C, Carlo S, Amalia L, Antonino S, Alberto C (2005) Extracellular superoxide dismutase (EC SOD) gene mutations screening in a sample of Mediterranean population. Mutation Res 578(12):143–148Google Scholar
- 18.Al-Abrash ASA, Al-Quobaili FA, Al-Akhras GN (2000) Catalase evaluation in different human diseases associated with oxidative stress. Saud Med J 21(9):826–830Google Scholar
- 25.Rahman SH, Nanny C, Ibrahim K, O’Reilly D, Larvin M, Kingsnorth AJ, McMahon MJ (2005) Genetic polymorphisms of GSTT1, GSTM1, GSTP1, MnSOD, and catalase in nonhereditary chronic pancreatitis: evidence of xenobiotic stress and impaired antioxidant capacity. Dig Dis Sci 50(7):376–1383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Gulati S, Yadav A, Kumar N, Priya K, Aggarwal NK, Kumar R, Gupta R (2015) Effect of GSTM1 and GSTT1 polymorphisms on genetic damage in humans populations exposed to radiation from mobile towers. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 69(2):1–11Google Scholar
- 27.Wolf R, Wolf D (2007) Increased incidence of cancer near a cellphone transmitted station. In: Columbus F (ed) Trends in cancer prevention. Nova Science Publishers, New York, pp 1–8Google Scholar
- 34.Kesari KK, Kumar S, Behari J (2010) Mobile phone use and male infertility in Wistar rats. Indian J Exp Biol 47:987–992Google Scholar
- 37.Liubimova NE, Vorobtsova IE (2007) The effect of age and low dose irradiation on the chromosomal aberration frequency in human lymphocytes. Radiat Biol Radioecol 47(1):80–85Google Scholar