A novel agent, methylophiopogonanone B, promotes Rho activation and tubulin depolymerization

Article

Abstract

Cytoskeletal reorganization, including reconstruction of actin fibers and microtubules, is essential for various biological processes, such as cell migration, proliferation and dendrite formation. We show here that methylophiopogonanone B (MOPB) induces cell morphological change via melanocyte dendrite retraction and stress fiber formation. Since members of the Rho family of small GTP-binding proteins act as master regulators of dendrite formation and actin cytoskeletal reorganization, and activated Rho promotes dendrite retraction and stress fiber formation, we studied the effects of MOPB on the small GTPases using normal human epidermal melanocytes and HeLa cells. In in vitro binding assay, MOPB significantly increased GTP-Rho, but not GTP-Rac or GTP-CDC42. Furthermore, a Rho inhibitor, a Rho kinase inhibitor and a small GTPase inhibitor each blocked MOPB-induced stress fiber formation. The effect of MOPB on actin reorganization was blocked in a Rho dominant negative mutant. These results suggest MOPB acts via the Rho signaling pathway, and it may directly or indirectly activate Rho. Quantitative Western blot analysis indicated that MOPB also induced microtubule destabilization and tubulin depolymerization. Thus, MOPB appears to induce Rho activation, resulting in actin cytoskeletal reorganization, including dendrite retraction and stress fiber formation.

Keywords

actin cell morphology methylophiopogonanone B Rho tubulin 

Abbreviations

MOPB

methylophiopogonanone B

NHEM

normal human epidermal melanocytes

ROCK

Rho kinase

References

  1. 1.
    Ridley AJ, Hall A (1992) The small GTP-binding protein rho regulates the assembly of focal adhesions and actin stress fibers in response to growth factors. Cell 70: 389–399PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Etienne-Manneville S, Hall A (2002) Rho GTPases in cell biology. Nature 420: 629–635PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wherlock M, Mellor H (2002) The Rho GTPase family: a Racs to Wrchs story. J Cell Sci 115: 239–240PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Burridge K, Wennerberg K (2004) Rho and Rac take center stage. Cell 116: 167–179PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ridley AJ, Paterson HF, Johnston CL, Diekmann D, Hall A (1992) The small GTP-binding protein rac regulates growth factor-induced membrane ruffling. Cell 70: 401–410PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jalink K, van Corven EJ, Hengeveld T, Morii N, Narumiya S, Moolenaar WH (1994) Inhibition of lysophosphatidate- and thrombin-induced neurite retraction and neuronal cell rounding by ADP ribosylation of the small GTP-binding protein Rho. J Cell Biol 126: 801–810PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ridley AJ (1994) Signal transduction through the GTP-binding proteins Rac and Rho. J Cell Sci Suppl 18: 127–131PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kozma R, Ahmed S, Best A, Lim L (1995) The Ras-related protein Cdc42Hs and bradykinin promote formation of peripheral actin microspikes and filopodia in Swiss 3T3 fibroblasts. Mol Cell Biol 15: 1942–1952PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Scott G (2002) Rac and Rho: the story behind melanocyte dendrite formation. Pigment Cell Res 15: 322–330PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nakazawa K, Damour O, Collombel C (1993) Modulation of normal human melanocyte dendricity by growth-promoting agents. Pigment Cell Res 6: 406–416PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Duval C, Regnier M, Schmidt R (2001) Distinct melanogenic response of human melanocytes in mono-culture, in co-culture with keratinocytes and in reconstructed epidermis, to UV exposure. Pigment Cell Res 14: 348–355PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Virador V, Matsunaga N, Matsunaga J, Valencia J, Oldham RJ, Kameyama K, Peck GL, Ferrans VJ, Vieira WD, Abdel-Malek ZA, Hearing VJ (2001) Production of melanocyte-specific antibodies to human melanosomal proteins: expression patterns in normal human skin and in cutaneous pigment lesions. Pigment Cell Res 14: 289–297PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Scott G, Cassidy L (1998) Rac1 mediates dendrite formation in response to melanocyte stimulating hormone and ultraviolet light in a murine melanoma model. J Invest Dermatol 111: 243–250PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yasui H, Katoh H, Yamaguchi Y, Aoki J, Fujita H, Mori K, Negishi M: Differential responses to nerve growth factor and epidermal growth factor in neurite outgrowth of PC12 cells are determined by Rac1 activation systems. J Biol Chem 276: 15298–15305, 2001Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Busca R, Bertolotto C, Abbe P, Englaro W, Ishizaki T, Narumiya S, Boquet P, Ortonne JP, Ballotti R (1998) Inhibition of Rho is required for cAMP-induced melanoma cell differentiation. Mol Biol Cell 9: 1367–1378PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Katoh H, Aoki J, Ichikawa A, Negishi M (1998) p160 RhoA-binding kinase ROKalpha induces neurite retraction. J Biol Chem 273: 2489–2492PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sander EE, ten Klooster JP, van Delft S, van der Kammen RA, Collard JG (1999) Rac downregulates Rho activity: reciprocal balance between both GTPases determines cellular morphology and migratory behavior. J Cell Biol 147: 1009–1022PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Threadgill R, Bobb K, Ghosh A (1997) Regulation of dendritic growth and remodeling by Rho, Rac, and Cdc42. Neuron 19: 625–634PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lacour JP, Gordon PR, Eller M, Bhawan J, Gilchrest BA (1992) Cytoskeletal events underlying dendrite formation by cultured pigment cells. J Cell Physiol 151: 287–299PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Enomoto T (1996) Microtubule disruption induces the formation of actin stress fibers and focal adhesions in cultured cells: possible involvement of the rho signal cascade. Cell Struct Funct 21: 317–326PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Beutler JA, Hamel E, Vlietinck AJ, Haemers A, Rajan P, Roitman JN, Cardellina JH 2nd, Boyd MR (1998) Structure-activity requirements for flavone cytotoxicity and binding to tubulin. J Med Chem 41: 2333–2338PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kim JH, Sohn SH, Hong SW (2001) Three-dimensional quantitative structure activity relationship studies on the flavone cytotoxicity and binding to tubulin. J Photosci 8: 119–121Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tada A, Kanamaru A, Ito Y (2005) Control of melanosome transfer by promoting shrinkage or expansion of melanocyte dendrites. IFSCC Mag 8: 293–299Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ito Y, Kanamaru A, Tada A (2006) Centaureidin promotes dendrite retraction of melanocytes by activating Rho. Biochim Biophys Acta 1760: 487–494PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ito Y, Kanamaru A, Tada A: Effects of methylophiopogonanone B on melanosome transfer and dendrite retraction. J Dermatol Sci 42: 68–70, 2006Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tada A, Kasai R, Saitoh T, Shoji J (1980) Studies on the constituents of Ophiopogonis Tuber. V. Isolation of a novel class of homoisoflavonoids and determination of their structures. Chem Pharm Bull 28: 1477–1484Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Amano M, Mukai H, Ono Y, Chihara K, Matsui T, Hamajima Y, Okawa K, Iwamatsu A, Kaibuchi K: Identification of a putative target for Rho as the serine–threonine kinase protein kinase N. Science 271: 648–650, 1996Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kuroda S, Fukata M, Kobayashi K, Nakafuku M, Nomura N, Iwamatsu A, Kaibuchi K (1996) Identification of IQGAP as a putative target for the small GTPases, Cdc42 and Rac1. J Biol Chem 271: 23363–23367PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kuroda S, Fukata M, Fujii K, Nakamura T, Izawa I, Kaibuchi K (1997) Regulation of cell–cell adhesion of MDCK cells by Cdc42 and Rac1 small GTPases. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 240: 430–435PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Zhou J, Panda D, Landen JW, Wilson L, Joshi HC (2002) Minor alteration of microtubule dynamics causes loss of tension across kinetochore pairs and activates the spindle checkpoint. J Biol Chem 277: 17200–17208PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kimura K, Ito M, Amano M, Chihara K, Fukata Y, Nakafuku M, Yamamori B, Feng J, Nakano T, Okawa K, Iwamatsu A, Kaibuchi K (1996) Regulation of myosin phosphatase by Rho and Rho-associated kinase (Rho-kinase). Science 273: 245–248PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Danowski BA (1989) Fibroblast contractility and actin organization are stimulated by microtubule inhibitors. J Cell Sci 93: 255–266PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Anderson S, DiCesare L, Tan I, Leung T, SundarRaj N (2004) Rho-mediated assembly of stress fibers is differentially regulated in corneal fibroblasts and myofibroblasts. Exp Cell Res 298: 574–583PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wadkins RM, Jares-Erijman EA, Klement R, Rudiger A, Jovin TM (1996) Actinomycin D binding to single-stranded DNA: sequence specificity and hemi-intercalation model from fluorescence and 1H NMR spectroscopy. J Mol Biol 262: 53–68PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kominek LA (1975) Cycloheximide production by Streptomyces griseus: alleviation of end-product inhibition by dialysis-extraction fermentation. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 7: 861–863PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Wilson L, Panda D, Jordan MA (1999) Modulation of microtubule dynamics by drugs: a paradigm for the actions of cellular regulators. Cell Struct Funct 24: 329–335PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Islam MN, Iskander MN (2004) Microtubulin binding sites as target for developing anticancer agents. Mini Rev Med Chem 4: 1077–1104PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Zhou J, Giannakakou P (2005) Targeting microtubules for cancer chemotherapy. Curr Med Chem Anti-Canc Agents 5: 65–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.POLA LaboratoriesPOLA Chemical Industries, Inc.Totsuka-ku, YokohamaJapan

Personalised recommendations