Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry

, Volume 279, Issue 1–2, pp 169–181 | Cite as

Resistance to apoptosis, increased growth potential, and altered gene expression in cells that survived genotoxic hexavalent chromium [Cr(VI)] exposure

  • Daryl E. Pritchard
  • Susan Ceryak
  • Keri E. Ramsey
  • Travis J. O'Brien
  • Linan Ha
  • Jamie L. Fornsaglio
  • Dietrich A. Stephan
  • Steven R. PatiernoEmail author


Certain hexavalent chromium [Cr(VI)] compounds are known genotoxic respiratory carcinogens, which induce apoptosis as a predominant mode of cell death. Selection of cells that are resistant to apoptosis may be a factor in tumour progression. We developed sub-populations of telomerase-transfected human fibroblasts (BJ-hTERT) that survived a 99% clonogenically lethal exposure to Cr(VI) (B-5Cr). B-5Cr cells were markedly resistant to apoptosis induced by several agents and exhibited increased clonogenic survival, especially at apoptogenic doses. B-5Cr cells did not exhibit altered cellular uptake of Cr(VI) and retained a normal p53 response to Cr(VI) exposure. We conducted large-scale gene expression analysis at different time-points after a secondary genotoxic Cr(VI) insult in B-5Cr and BJ-hTERT cells using Affymetrix Genechip® human genome arrays. Cr(VI) exposure led to differential regulation of many genes, which affect a diverse set of cellular activities such as transcription, signal transduction, stress response, cell adhesion, DNA repair, apoptosis and cell cycle modulation. We compared Cr(VI)-induced altered gene expression in the B-5Cr cells to that in the parental cells and identified 223, 147 and 204 genes with at least a two-fold difference in expression at 4, 8 and 18 h after exposure, respectively. Cluster analysis by gene function revealed altered expression of genes involved in apoptosis, cell cycle regulation and DNA repair. Our data suggest an alteration in gene expression that may favor cell survival and/or incomplete DNA repair after genotoxic exposure. Selection of cells with altered expression of these genes may constitute the early stages of tumour progression.


Hexavalent Chromium Altered Gene Expression Genome Array Clonogenic Survival Cell Cycle Modulation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Hartwell LH, Kastan MB: Cell cycle control and cancer. Science 266: 1821–1828, 1994PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Evan GI, Vousden KH: Proliferation, cell cycle and apoptosis in cancer. Nature 411: 342–348, 2001CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Blankenship LJ, Carlisle DL, Wise JP, Orenstein JM, Dye LE III, Patierno SR: Induction of apoptotic cell death by particulate lead chromate: differential effects of vitamins C and E on genotoxicity and survival. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 146: 270–280, 1997CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Carlisle DL, Pritchard DE, Singh J, Patierno SR: Chromium(VI) induces p53-dependent apoptosis in diploid human lung and mouse dermal fibroblasts. Mol Carcinog 28: 111–118, 2000PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Carlisle DL, Pritchard DE, Singh J, Owens BM, Blankenship LJ, Orenstein JM, Patierno SR: Apoptosis and P53 induction in human lung fibroblasts exposed to chromium (VI): effect of ascorbate and tocopherol. Toxicol Sci 55: 60–68, 2000CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Singh J, Carlisle DL, Pritchard DE, Patierno SR: Chromium-induced genotoxicity and apoptosis: Relationship to chromium carcinogenesis (review). Oncol Rep 5: 1307–1318, 1998PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pritchard DE, Ceryak S, Ha L, Fornsaglio JL, Hartman SK, O'Brien TJ, Patierno SR: Mechanism of apoptosis and determination of cellular fate in chromium(VI)-exposed populations of telomerase-immortalized human fibroblasts. Cell Growth Differ 12: 487–496, 2001PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chromium, nickel and welding [erratum appears in IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum 1991; 51: 483]. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum 49: 1–648, 1990Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hayes RB: Review of occupational epidemiology of chromium chemicals and respiratory cancer. Sci Total Environ 71: 331–339, 1988CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fishbein L: Sources, transport and alterations of metal compounds: an overview. I. Arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, and nickel. Environ Health Perspect 40: 43–64, 1981PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    The chromium problem: Research needs and risk assessment. Environ Health Perspect 92: 1991Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    IARC: Monographs on the evaluation of the carcinogenic risk of chemicals to humans. 167–170, 1982Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Burke DJ: Complexity in the spindle checkpoint. Curr Opin Genet Dev 10: 26–31, 2000CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wetterhahn KE, Hamilton JW, Aiyar J, Borges KM, Floyd R: Mechanism of chromium(VI) carcinogenesis. Reactive intermediates and effect on gene expression. Biol Trace Element Res 21: 405–411, 1989Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rossi SC, Wetterhahn KE: Chromium(V) is produced upon reduction of chromate by mitochondrial electron transport chain complexes. Carcinogenesis 10: 913–920, 1989PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Stearns DM, Wetterhahn KE: Reaction of chromium(VI) with ascorbate produces chromium(V), chromium(IV), and carbon-based radicals. Chem Res Toxicol 7: 219–230, 1994CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sugden KD, Martin BD: Guanine and 7,8-dihydro-8-oxo-guanine-specific oxidation in DNA by chromium(V). Environ Health Perspect 110(Suppl 5): 725–728, 2002PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sugden KD, Campo CK, Martin BD: Direct oxidation of guanine and 7,8-dihydro-8-oxoguanine in DNA by a high-valent chromium complex: A possible mechanism for chromate genotoxicity. Chem Res Toxicol 14: 1315–1322, 2001CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Miller CA III, Costa M: Characterization of DNA–protein complexes induced in intact cells by the carcinogen chromate. Mol Carcinog 1: 125–133, 1988PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Standeven AM, Wetterhahn KE: Chromium (VI) toxicity: Uptake, reduction, and DNA damage. J Am Cell Toxicol 8: 1275–1283, 1989Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Singh J, Mclean JA, Pritchard DE, Montaser A, Patierno SR: Sensitive quantitation of chromium–DNA adducts by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry with a direct injection high-efficiency nebulizer. Toxicol Sci 46: 260–265, 1998CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Xu J, Manning FC, Patierno SR: Preferential formation and repair of chromium-induced DNA adducts and DNA–protein crosslinks in nuclear matrix DNA. Carcinogenesis 15: 1443–1450, 1994PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Xu J, Bubley GJ, Detrick B, Blankenship LJ, Patierno SR: Chromium(VI) treatment of normal human lung cells results in guanine-specific DNA polymerase arrest, DNA–DNA cross-links and S-phase blockade of cell cycle. Carcinogenesis 17: 1511–1517, 1996PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Singh J, Bridgewater LC, Patierno SR: Differential sensitivity of chromium-mediated DNA interstrand crosslinks and DNA–protein crosslinks to disruption by alkali and EDTA. Toxicol Sci 45: 72–76, 1998CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bridgewater LC, Manning FC, Patierno SR: Base-specific arrest of in vitro DNA replication by carcinogenic chromium: Relationship to DNA interstrand crosslinking. Carcinogenesis 15: 2421–2427, 1994PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    O'Brien TJ, Ceryak S, Patierno SR: Complexities of chromium carcinogenesis: role of cellular response, repair and recovery mechanisms. Mutat Res 533: 3–36, 2003PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bridgewater LC, Manning FC, Woo ES, Patierno SR: DNA polymerase arrest by adducted trivalent chromium. Mol Carcinog 9: 122–133, 1994PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Manning FC, Xu J, Patierno SR: Transcriptional inhibition by carcinogenic chromate: relationship to DNA damage. Mol Carcinog 6: 270–279, 1992PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Patierno SR, Banh D, Landolph JR: Transformation of C3H/10T1/2 mouse embryo cells to focus formation and anchorage independence by insoluble lead chromate but not soluble calcium chromate: Relationship to mutagenesis and internalization of lead chromate particles. Cancer Res 48: 5280–5288, 1988PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Patierno SR, Landolph JR: Soluble vs insoluble hexavalent chromate. Relationship of mutation to in vitro transformation and particle uptake. Biol Trace Element Res 21: 469–474, 1989Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zhitkovich A, Song Y, Quievryn G, Voitkun V: Non-oxidative mechanisms are responsible for the induction of mutagenesis by reduction of Cr(VI) with cysteine: role of ternary DNA adducts in Cr(III)-dependent mutagenesis. Biochemistry 40: 549–560, 2001CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Tully DB, Collins BJ, Overstreet JD, Smith CS, Dinse GE, Mumtaz MM, Chapin RE: Effects of arsenic, cadmium, chromium, and lead on gene expression regulated by a battery of 13 different promoters in recombinant HepG2 cells. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 168: 79–90, 2000CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wetterhahn KE, Hamilton JW: Molecular basis of hexavalent chromium carcinogenicity: Effect on gene expression. Sci Total Environ 86: 113–129, 1989CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hamilton JW, Kaltreider RC, Bajenova OV, Ihnat MA, McCaffrey J, Turpie BW, Rowell EE, Oh J, Nemeth MJ, Pesce CA, Lariviere JP: Molecular basis for effects of carcinogenic heavy metals on inducible gene expression. Environ Health Perspect 106(Suppl 4): 1005–1015, 1998PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wise JP, Orenstein JM, Patierno SR: Inhibition of lead chromate clastogenesis by ascorbate: Relationship to particle dissolution and uptake. Carcinogenesis 14: 429–434, 1993PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Wise JP Sr, Stearns DM, Wetterhahn KE, Patierno SR: Cell-enhanced dissolution of carcinogenic lead chromate particles: The role of individual dissolution products in clastogenesis. Carcinogenesis 15: 2249–2254, 1994PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Wright WE, Pereira-Smith OM, Shay JW: Reversible cellular senescence: implications for immortalization of normal human diploid fibroblasts. Mol Cell Biol 9: 3088–3092, 1989PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Campisi J: Replicative senescence: an old lives' tale? Cell 84: 497–500, 1996Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Shay JW, Pereira-Smith OM, Wright WE: A role for both RB and p53 in the regulation of human cellular senescence. Exp Cell Res 196: 33–39, 1991CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Counter CM, Avilion AA, LeFeuvre CE, Stewart NG, Greider CW, Harley CB, Bacchetti S: Telomere shortening associated with chromosome instability is arrested in immortal cells which express telomerase activity. EMBO J 11: 1921–1929, 1992PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Jiang XR, Jimenez G, Chang E, Frolkis M, Kusler B, Sage M, Beeche M, Bodnar AG, Wahl GM, Tlsty TD, Chiu CP: Telomerase expression in human somatic cells does not induce changes associated with a transformed phenotype. Nat Genet 21: 111–114, 1999CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Vaziri H, Squire JA, Pandita TK, Bradley G, Kuba RM, Zhang H, Gulyas S, Hill RP, Nolan GP, Benchimol S: Analysis of genomic integrity and p53-dependent G1 checkpoint in telomerase-induced extended-life-span human fibroblasts. Mol Cell Biol 19: 2373–2379, 1999PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Ha L, Ceryak S, Patierno SR: Chromium (VI) activates ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) protein: Requirement of ATM for both apoptosis and recovery from terminal growth arrest. J Biol Chem 278: 17885–17894, 2003PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Chen YW, Zhao P, Borup R, Hoffman EP: Expression profiling in the muscular dystrophies: Identification of novel aspects of molecular pathophysiology. J Cell Biol 151: 1321–1336, 2000CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Ye J, Wang S, Leonard SS, Sun Y, Butterworth L, Antonini J, Ding M, Rojanasakul Y, Vallyathan V, Castranova V, Shi X: Role of reactive oxygen species and p53 in chromium(VI)-induced apoptosis. J Biol Chem 274: 34974–34980, 1999CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Igney FH, Krammer PH: Death and anti-death: Tumour resistance to apoptosis. Nat Rev Cancer 2: 277–288, 2002CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Hofseth LJ: The adaptive imbalance to genotoxic stress: genome guardians rear their ugly heads. Carcinogenesis 25: 1787–1793, 2004CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Flatt PM, Polyak K, Tang LJ, Scatena CD, Westfall MD, Rubinstein LA, Yu J, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B, Hill DE, Pietenpol JA: p53-dependent expression of PIG3 during proliferation, genotoxic stress, and reversible growth arrest. Cancer Lett 156: 63–72, 2000CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Levine AJ: p53, the cellular gatekeeper for growth and division: review [55 refs]. Cell 88: 323–331, 1997CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Son KH, Zhang M, Rucobo E, Nwaigwe D, Montgomery F, Leffert H: Derivation and study of human epithelial cell lines resistant to killing by chromium trioxide. J Toxicol Environ Health A 67: 1027–1049, 2004CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Tamas MJ, Wysocki R: Mechanisms involved in metalloid transport and tolerance acquisition. Curr Genet 40: 2–12, 2001CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Wernyj RP, Morin PJ: Molecular mechanisms of platinum resistance: Still searching for the Achilles' heel. Drug Resist Updat 7: 227–232, 2004CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Ye J, Shi X: Gene expression profile in response to chromium-induced cell stress in A549 cells. Mol Cell Biochem 222: 189–197, 2001CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Izzotti A, Cartiglia C, Balansky R, D'Agostini F, Longobardi M, De Flora S: Selective induction of gene expression in rat lung by hexavalent chromium. Mol Carcinog 35: 75–84, 2002CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    D'Agostini F, Izzotti A, Bennicelli C, Camoirano A, Tampa E, De Flora S: Induction of apoptosis in the lung but not in the liver of rats receiving intra-tracheal instillations of chromium(VI). Carcinogenesis 23: 587–593, 2002CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Andrew AS, Warren AJ, Barchowsky A, Temple KA, Klei L, Soucy NV, O'Hara KA, Hamilton JW: Genomic and proteomic profiling of responses to toxic metals in human lung cells. Environ Health Perspect 111: 825–835, 2003PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Ceryak S, Zingariello C, O'Brien T, Patierno SR: Induction of pro-apoptotic and cell cycle-inhibiting genes in chromium(VI)-treated human lung fibroblasts: lack of effect of ERK. Mol Cell Biochem 255: 139–149, 2004CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Thomas G: MAP kinase by any other name smells just as sweet. Cell 68: 3–6, 1992CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Ballif BA, Blenis J: Molecular mechanisms mediating mammalian mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) kinase (MEK)-MAPK cell survival signals. Cell Growth Differ 12: 397–408, 2001PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Moelling K, Schad K, Bosse M, Zimmermann S, Schweneker M: Regulation of Raf-Akt Cross-talk. J Biol Chem 277: 31099–31106, 2002CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Murphy LO, Smith S, Chen RH, Fingar DC, Blenis J: Molecular interpretation of ERK signal duration by immediate early gene products. Nat Cell Biol 4: 556–564, 2002PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Keyse SM: Protein phosphatases and the regulation of mitogen-activated protein kinase signalling: review [49 refs]. Curr Opin Cell Biol 12: 186–192, 2000CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Zhou B, Wang ZX, Zhao Y, Brautigan DL, Zhang ZY: The specificity of extracellular signal-regulated kinase 2 dephosphorylation by protein phosphatases. J Biol Chem 277: 31818–31825, 2002CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Theodosiou A, Smith A, Gillieron C, Arkinstall S, Ashworth A: MKP5, a new member of the MAP kinase phosphatase family, which selectively dephosphorylates stress-activated kinases. Oncogene 18: 6981–6988, 1999CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Samet JM, Graves LM, Quay J, Dailey LA, Devlin RB, Ghio AJ, Wu W, Bromberg PA, Reed W: Activation of MAPKs in human bronchial epithelial cells exposed to metals. Am J Physiol 275: L551–L558, 1998PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Chuang SM, Liou GY, Yang JL: Activation of JNK, p38 and ERK mitogen-activated protein kinases by chromium(VI) is mediated through oxidative stress but does not affect cytotoxicity. Carcinogenesis 21: 1491–1500, 2000CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Chuang SM, Yang JL: Comparison of roles of three mitogen-activated protein kinases induced by chromium(VI) and cadmium in non-small-cell lung carcinoma cells. Mol Cell Biochem 222: 85–95, 2001CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Landolph JR: Molecular mechanisms of transformation of C3H/10T1/2 C1 8 mouse embryo cells and diploid human fibroblasts by carcinogenic metal compounds: review [58 refs]. Environ Health Perspect 102(Suppl 3): 119–125, 1994Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Gilmore TD, Kalaitzidis D, Liang MC, Starczynowski DT: The c-Rel transcription factor and B-cell proliferation: a deal with the devil. Oncogene 23: 2275–2286, 2004CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Hanson JL, Hawke NA, Kashatus D, Baldwin AS: The nuclear factor kappaB subunits RelA/p65 and c-Rel potentiate but are not required for Ras-induced cellular transformation. Cancer Res 64: 7248–7255, 2004CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Shumilla JA, Wetterhahn KE, Barchowsky A: Inhibition of NF-kappa B binding to DNA by chromium, cadmium, mercury, zinc, and arsenite in vitro: Evidence of a thiol mechanism. Arch Biochem Biophys 349: 356–362, 1998CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Chen F, Bower J, Leonard SS, Ding M, Lu Y, Rojanasakul Y, Kung HF, Vallyathan V, Castranova V, Shi X: Protective roles of NF-kappa B for chromium(VI)-induced cytotoxicity is revealed by expression of Ikappa B kinase-beta mutant. J Biol Chem 277: 3342–3349, 2002CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Kaltreider RC, Pesce CA, Ihnat MA, Lariviere JP, Hamilton JW: Differential effects of arsenic(III) and chromium(VI) on nuclear transcription factor binding. Mol Carcinog 25: 219–229, 1999CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Hahn WC, Weinberg RA: Modelling the molecular circuitry of cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 2: 331–341, 2002CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Mathon NF, Lloyd AC: Cell senescence and cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 1: 203–213, 2001CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Lehmann AR: DNA repair-deficient diseases, xeroderma pigmentosum, Cockayne syndrome and trichothiodystrophy. Biochimie 85: 1101–1111, 2003CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Rosselli F, Briot D, Pichierri P: The Fanconi anemia pathway and the DNA interstrand cross-links repair. Biochimie 85: 1175–1184, 2003CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Eastman QM, Villey IJ, Schatz DG: Detection of RAG protein-V(D)J recombination signal interactions near the site of DNA cleavage by UV cross-linking. Mol Cell Biol 19: 3788–3797, 1999PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Mo X, Bailin T, Sadofsky MJ: RAG1 and RAG2 cooperate in specific binding to the recombination signal sequence in vitro. J Biol Chem 274: 7025–7031, 1999CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Reynolds M, Peterson E, Quievryn G, Zhitkovich A: Human nucleotide excision repair efficiently removes chromium–DNA phosphate adducts and protects cells against chromate toxicity. J Biol Chem 279: 30419–30424, 2004CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    O'Brien TJ, Fornsaglio JL, Ceryak S, Patierno SR: Effects of hexavalent chromium on the survival and cell cycle distribution of DNA repair-deficient S. cerevisiae. DNA Repair 1: 617–627, 2002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Sheela S, Barrett JC: Degradation of type IV collagen by neoplastic human skin fibroblasts. Carcinogenesis 6: 173–179, 1985PubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Tsujimoto Y, Shimizu S: VDAC regulation by the Bcl-2 family of proteins: Review [73 refs]. Cell Death Differ 7: 1174–1181, 2000CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Vieira HL, Haouzi D, El Hamel C, Jacotot E, Belzacq AS, Brenner C, Kroemer G: Permeabilization of the mitochondrial inner membrane during apoptosis: Impact of the adenine nucleotide translocator. Cell Death Differ 7: 1146–1154, 2000CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Halestrap AP, McStay GP, Clarke SJ: The permeability transition pore complex: Another view: review [86 refs]. Biochimie 84: 153–166, 2002CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Harris MH, Thompson CB: The role of the Bcl-2 family in the regulation of outer mitochondrial membrane permeability: review [92 refs]. Cell Death Differ 7: 1182–1191, 2000CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Pritchard DE, Singh J, Carlisle DL, Patierno SR: Cyclosporin A inhibits chromium(VI)-induced apoptosis and mitochondrial cytochrome c release and restores clonogenic survival in CHO cells. Carcinogenesis 21: 2027–2033, 2000CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daryl E. Pritchard
    • 1
  • Susan Ceryak
    • 1
  • Keri E. Ramsey
    • 2
  • Travis J. O'Brien
    • 1
  • Linan Ha
    • 1
  • Jamie L. Fornsaglio
    • 1
  • Dietrich A. Stephan
    • 2
  • Steven R. Patierno
    • 1
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.The George Washington University Medical CenterWashingtonUSA
  2. 2.Translational Genomics Research InstitutePhoenixUSA
  3. 3.Department of PharmacologyThe George Washington University Medical CenterWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations