Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability

, Volume 18, Issue 4, pp 937–966 | Cite as

Piecewise Linear Approximations for Cure Rate Models and Associated Inferential Issues

  • N. Balakrishnan
  • M. V. Koutras
  • F. S. MilienosEmail author
  • S. Pal


Cure rate models offer a convenient way to model time-to-event data by allowing a proportion of individuals in the population to be completely cured so that they never face the event of interest (say, death). The most studied cure rate models can be defined through a competing cause scenario in which the random variables corresponding to the time-to-event for each competing causes are conditionally independent and identically distributed while the actual number of competing causes is a latent discrete random variable. The main interest is then in the estimation of the cured proportion as well as in developing inference about failure times of the susceptibles. The existing literature consists of parametric and non/semi-parametric approaches, while the expectation maximization (EM) algorithm offers an efficient tool for the estimation of the model parameters due to the presence of right censoring in the data. In this paper, we study the cases wherein the number of competing causes is either a binary or Poisson random variable and a piecewise linear function is used for modeling the hazard function of the time-to-event. Exact likelihood inference is then developed based on the EM algorithm and the inverse of the observed information matrix is used for developing asymptotic confidence intervals. The Monte Carlo simulation study demonstrates the accuracy of the proposed non-parametric approach compared to the results attained from the true correct parametric model. The proposed model and the inferential method is finally illustrated with a data set on cutaneous melanoma.


Cure rate models Competing causes Maximum likelihood estimators EM algorithm Lifetime data Exponential distribution Weibull distribution Piecewise constant/linear approximations Cutaneous melanoma data 

Mathematics Subject Classification (2010)

62N02 62P10 62N05 62G07 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Arbutiski T (1985) A family of multiplicative survival models incorporating a long-term survivorship parameter c as a function of covariates. Comm Stat Theo Meth 14:1627–1642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Balakrishnan N, Pal S (2012) EM algorithm-based likelihood estimation for some cure rate models. J Stat Theo Prac 6:698–724MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Balakrishnan N, Pal S (2013a) Lognormal lifetimes and likelihood-based inference for flexible cure rate models based on COM-Poisson family. Comput Stat Data Anal 67:41–67MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Balakrishnan N, Pal S (2013b) Expectation maximization-based likelihood inference for flexible cure rate models with Weibull lifetimes. Stat Methods Med Res. doi: 10.1177/0962280213491641. available online
  5. Balakrishnan N, Pal S (2013c) COM-Poisson cure rate models and associated likelihood-based inference with exponential and Weibull lifetimes. In: Balakrishnan N., Pal S (eds) Applied Reliability Engineering and Risk Analysis: Probabilistic Models and Statistical Inference, Chapter 22. Wiley, UK, pp 308–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berkson J, Gage RP (1952) Survival curves for cancer patients following treatment. J Am Stat Assoc 47:501–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Betensky RA, Schoenfeld DA (2001) Nonparametric estimation in a cure model with random cure times. Biometrics 57:282–286MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Boag JM (1949) Maximum likelihood estimates of the proportion of patients cured by cancer therapy. J R Stat Soc Ser B 11:15–44zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Broet P, Rycke Y, Tubert-Bitter P, Lellouch J, Asselain B, Moreau T (2001) A semiparametric approach for the two-sample comparison of survival times with long-term survivors. Biometrics 57:844–852MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Cantor AB, Shuster JJ (1992) Parametric versus non-parametric methods for estimating cure rates based on censored survival data. Stat Med 11:931–937CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Castro MD, Cancho VG, Rodrigues J (2009) A Bayesian long-term survival model parametrized in the cured fraction. Biom J 51:443–455MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chen MH, Ibrahim JG (2001) Maximum likelihood methods for cure rate models with missing covariates. Biometrics 57:43–52MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. Chen MH, Ibrahim JG, Sinha D (1999) A new Bayesian model for survival data with a surviving fraction. J Am Stat Assoc 94:909–919MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. de Freitas LA, Rodrigues J (2013) Standard exponential cure rate model with informative censoring. Comm Stat Sim Comp 42:8–23MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. Fang HB, Li G, Sun J (2005) Maximum likelihood estimation in a semiparametric logistic/proportional-hazards mixture model. Scand J Stat 32:59–75MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. Farewell VT (1977) A model for a binary variable with time-censored observations. Biometrika 64:43–46CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. Farewell VT (1982) The use of mixture models for the analysis of survival data with long-term survivors. Biometrics 38:1041–1046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Farewell VT (1986) Mixture models in survival analysis: are they worth the risk Can J Stat 14:257–262MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ghitany ME (1993) On the information matrix of exponential mixture models with long-term survivors. Biom J 35:15–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ghitany ME, Maller RA (1992) Asymptotic results for exponential mixture models with long-term survivors. Statistics 23:321–336MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. Goldman AI (1984) Survivorship analysis when cure is a possibility: a Monte Carlo study. Stat Med 3:153–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hu T, Xiang L (2013) Efficient estimation for semiparametric cure models with interval-censored data. J Multivar Anal 121:139–151MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. Ibrahim JG, Chen MH, Sinha D (2001) Bayesian semiparametric models for survival data with a cure fraction. Biometrics 57:383–388MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. Ibrahim JG, Chen MH, Sinha D (2005) Bayesian Survival Analysis. Wiley, New YorkCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. Kim S, Chen MH, Dey DK, Gamerman D (2007) Bayesian dynamic models for survival data with a cure fraction. Lifetime Data Anal 13:17–35MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. Kim S, Xi Y, Chen MH (2009) A new latent cure rate marker model for survival data. Ann Appl Stat 3:1124–1146MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. Kuk AY, Chen CH (1992) A mixture model combining logistic regression with proportional hazards regression. Biometrika 79:531–541CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. Larson MG, Dinse GE (1985) A mixture model for the regression analysis of competing risks data. Appl Stat 34:201–211MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Laska EM, Meisner MJ (1992) Nonparametric estimation and testing in a cure model. Biometrics 48:1223–1234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Li CS, Taylor JM, Sy JP (2001) Identifiability of cure models. Stat Prob Lett 54:389–395MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. Liu H, Shen Y (2009) A semiparametric regression cure model for interval-censored data. J Am Stat Assoc 104:1168–1178MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. Liu M, Lu W, Shao Y (2006) Interval mapping of quantitative trait loci for time-to-event data with the proportional hazards mixture cure model. Biometrics 62:1053–1061MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. Lo YC, Taylor JM, McBride WH, Withers HR (1993) The effect of fractionated doses of radiation on mouse spinal cord. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 27:309–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lu W (2008) Maximum likelihood estimation in the proportional hazards cure model. Ann Inst Stat Math 60:545–574MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  35. Maller RA, Zhou X (1992) Estimating the proportion of immunes in a censored sample. Biometrika 79:731–739MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  36. Maller RA, Zhou X (1996) Survival Analysis with Long-term Survivors. Wiley, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  37. Maller RA, Zhou S (1995) Testing for the presence of immune or cured individuals in censored survival data. Biometrics 1197–1205Google Scholar
  38. Peng Y, Dear KB (2000) A nonparametric mixture model for cure rate estimation. Biometrics 56:237–243CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  39. Peng Y, Dear KB, Denham JW (1998) A generalized F mixture model for cure rate estimation. Stat Med 17:813–830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rodrigues J, de Castro M, Balakrishnan N, Cancho V G (2011) Destructive weighted Poisson cure rate models. Lifetime Data Anal 17:333–346MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  41. Rodrigues J, Cancho V G, de Castro M, Louzada-Neto F (2009) On the unification of long-term survival models. Stat Prob Lett 79:753–759MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  42. Sposto R, Sather HN, Baker SA (1992) A comparison of tests of the difference in the proportion of patients who are cured. Biometrics 48:87–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Struthers CA, Farewell VT (1989) A mixture model for time to AIDS data with left truncation and an uncertain origin. Biometrika 76:814–817CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  44. Sy JP, Taylor JM (2000) Estimation in a Cox proportional hazards cure model. Biometrics 56:227–236MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  45. Sy JP, Taylor JM (2001) Standard errors for the Cox proportional hazards cure model. Math Comput Model 33:1237–1251CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  46. Taylor JM (1995) Semi-parametric estimation in failure time mixture models. Biometrics 51:899–907CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  47. Tournoud M, Ecochard R (2008) Promotion time models with time-changing exposure and heterogeneity: application to infectious diseases. Biom J 50:395–407MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tsodikov A (1998a) A proportional hazards model taking account of long-term survivors. Biometrics:1508–1516Google Scholar
  49. Tsodikov A (1998b) Asymptotic efficiency of a proportional hazards model with cure. Stat Prob Lett 39:237–244MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  50. Tsodikov A (2001) Estimation of survival based on proportional hazards when cure is a possibility. Math Comput Model 33:1227–1236MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  51. Tsodikov AD, Ibrahim JG, Yakovlev AY (2003) Estimating cure rates from survival data. J Am Stat Assoc 98:1063–1078MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Yakovlev AY, Cantor AB, Shuster JJ (1994) Parametric versus non-parametric methods for estimating cure rates based on censored survival data. Stat Med 13:983–986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Yakovlev AY, Tsodikov AD (1996) Stochastic Models of Tumor Latency and their Biostatistical Applications (Vol 1). World Scientific, SingaporeCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  54. Yamaguchi K (1992) Accelerated failure-time regression models with a regression model of surviving fraction: an application to the analysis of “permanent employment” in Japan. J Am Stat Assoc 87:284–292Google Scholar
  55. Zhao L, Feng D, Bellile EL, Taylor JM (2014) Bayesian random threshold estimation in a Cox proportional hazards cure model. Stat Med 33:650–661MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. Balakrishnan
    • 1
  • M. V. Koutras
    • 2
  • F. S. Milienos
    • 1
    Email author
  • S. Pal
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Mathematics and StatisticsMcMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada
  2. 2.Department of Statistics and Insurance ScienceUniversity of PiraeusPiraeusGreece
  3. 3.Department of MathematicsUniversity of Texas at ArlingtonArlingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations