Feminism as critique: comments on Johanna Oksala’s feminist experiences
- 68 Downloads
Johanna Oksala’s sharp and incisive new book offers a defense of the ongoing importance, richness, and vitality of feminist philosophy on two fronts. Her defense offers a compelling response both to conservative critics who maintain that feminist philosophy is a contradiction in terms—because feminism is a partisan political movement whereas philosophy is allegedly a disinterested search for timeless, universal truths—and to colleagues in gender and cultural studies who see philosophy as too conservative a discipline to facilitate cutting edge feminist research. Oksala defines feminist philosophy as a form of immanent social critique whose main goal is “to expose, analyze, criticize, and ultimately change the power relations that produce and organize society, or more fundamentally reality, in a way that makes it unequal or unjust for beings who are constructed and classified as women.”1To my mind, perhaps the most interesting feature of this definition—though it remains mostly...
- Allen, Amy. 2008. The Politics of Our Selves: Power, Autonomy, and Gender in Contemporary Critical Theory. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
- Foucault, Michel. 1998. My Body, This Paper, This Fire. In Aesthetics, Method, and Epistemology: Essential Writings of Michel Foucault, vol. 2, ed. James D. Faubion, 416. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
- Jacques Derrida, 1978. Cogito and the History of Madness. In Writing and Difference (trans: Alan Bass), 40. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Oksala, Johanna. 2016. feminist Experiences: Foucauldian and Phenomenological Investigations, 3. IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
- O’Leary, Timothy. 2011. Foucault and Fiction: The Experience Book. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar