Advertisement

Continental Philosophy Review

, Volume 52, Issue 2, pp 241–264 | Cite as

Piper’s question and ours: a role for adversity in group-centred views of non-agentive shame

  • Basil VassilicosEmail author
Article

Abstract

This paper aims to contribute to ‘group-centred views’ of non-agentive shame (victim shame, oppression shame), by linking them to an ‘anepistemic’ model of the experience and impact of human failing. One of the most vexing aspects of those group-centred views remains how susceptivity to such shame ought to be understood. This contribution focuses on how a basic familiarity with adversity, in everyday life, may open individuals up to these forms of shame. If, per group-centred views, non-agentive shame is importantly driven by participation in social practices with others, a better understanding of the impact of adversity on individuals’ lives may offer a way of explaining how embodied experience instils in individuals a need for such participation. The upshot is an understanding of the individual’s susceptivity to non-agentive shame, which affords it the same legitimacy as more conventional notions of shame.

Keywords

Shame Adversity Oppression Violence Participation 

Notes

References

  1. Amar, A., and A. Burgess. 2009. Rape and Its Impact on the Victim. In Practical Aspects of Rape Investigation: A Multi-disciplinary Approach, ed. R. Hazelwood and A. Burgess, 25–38. Boca Raton: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  2. Bartky, S.L. 1990. Femininity and Domination: Studies in the Phenomenology of Oppression. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Buss, S. 1999. Respect for Persons. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 29(4): 517–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brison, S.T. 1993. Surviving Sexual Violence: A Philosophical Perspective. Journal of Social Philosophy 24: 5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Calhoun, C. 2003. Cognitive Emotions. In What is an Emotion?, ed. R. Solomon, 236–247. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Calhoun, C. 2004. An Apology for Moral Shame. The Journal of Political Philosophy 12: 127–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cropanzano, R., J. Stein, and T. Nadisic. 2011. Social Justice and the Experience of Emotion. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. D’Arms, J., and D. Jacobson. 2003. The Significance of Recalcitrant Emotion (or, Anti-Quasijudgmentalism). Philosophy, Supplementary Volume: Proceedings of the Royal Institute of Philosophy 52: 127–146.Google Scholar
  9. Du Toit, L. 2009. A Philosophical Investigation of Rape: The Making and Unmaking of the Feminine Self. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Elster, J. 2004. Emotion and Action. In Thinking About Feeling: Contemporary Philosophers on Emotions, ed. R. Solomon, 151–162. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Fanon, F. 1986. Blacks Skins, White Masks (trans: Markmann, C.L.). London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  12. Gilbert, P. 2004. What is Shame? In Shame: Interpersonal Behavior, Psychopathology, and Culture, ed. P. Gilbert and B. Andrews, 3–38. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Goodman, L., and D. Epstein. 2008. Listening to Battered Women: A Survivor-Centered Approach to Advocacy, Mental Health, and Justice. Washington: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hazelwood, R., and A. Burgess. 2009. The Behavioral-Oriented Interview of Rape Victims: The Key to Profiling. In Practical Aspects of Rape Investigation: A Multi-disciplinary Approach, ed. R. Hazelwood and A. Burgess, 81–96. Boca Raton: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  15. Heidegger, M. 1962. Being and Time (trans: Macquarrie, J. and Robinson, E.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  16. Husserl, E. 1989. Ideas II: Studies in the Phenomenology of Constitution (trans: Rojcewicz, R. and Schuwer, A.). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  17. Hutchinson, P. 2008. Shame and Philosophy: An Investigation in the Philosophy of Emotions and Ethics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jenner, E. 2004. Survivors. In Encyclopedia of Rape, ed. M. Smith, 243–245. Westport: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  19. Kekes, J. 1988. Shame and Moral Progress. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 13: 282–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lanning, K. 2009. Cyber-Pedophiles: A Behavioral Perspective. In Practical Aspects of Rape Investigation: A Multi-disciplinary Approach, ed. R. Hazelwood and A. Burgess, 381–489. Boca Raton: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  21. Lewis, M. 2010. Self-Conscious Emotions: Embarrassment, Pride, Shame, and Guilt. In Handbook of Emotions, ed. M. Lewis, J. Haviland-Jones and L.F. Barrett, 742–756. London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  22. Lindsay-Hartz, J., J. de Rivera, and M. Mascolo. 1995. Differentiating Guilt and Shame and Their Effects on Motivation. In Self-Conscious Emotions: The Psychology of Shame, Guilt, Embarrassment and Pride, ed. J. Tangney and K. Fischer, 274–300. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  23. Lynd, H.M. 1963. On Shame and the Search for Identity. New York: Harcourt and Brace.Google Scholar
  24. Maibom, H.L. 2010. The Descent of Shame. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 80: 566–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Merleau-Ponty, M. 2012. The Phenomenology of Perception (trans: Landes, D.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Mui, C. 2005. A Feminist-Sartrean Approach to Understanding Rape Trauma. In Sartre Today, ed. A. van den Hoven and A. Leak, 153–165. New York: Berghahn.Google Scholar
  27. Nathanson, D. 1992. Shame and Pride: Affect, Sex, and the Birth of the Self. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  28. Orth, U., M. Berking, and S. Burkhardt. 2006. Self-Conscious Emotions and Depression: Rumination Explains Why Shame But Not Guilt is Maladaptive. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 32: 1608–1620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Peckitt, M.G. 2010. Resisting Sartrean Pain: Henry, Sartre, and Biranism. In Sartre and the Body, ed. K. Morris, 120–129. London: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Petersen, D. 2003. Trauma and the Crime Victim. In Victim Assistance: Exploring Individual Practice, Organizational Policy, and Societal Responses, ed. T. Underwood and C. Edmunds, 95–123. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  31. Piper, A. 1996. Passing for White, Passing for Black. In Passing and the Fictions of Identity, ed. E. Ginsberg. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Raine, N. 1998. After Silence: Rape & My Journey Back. New York: Crown Publishers.Google Scholar
  33. Sartre, J.-P. 1960. The Transcendence of the Ego (trans: Williams, F. and Kirkpatrick, R.). New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
  34. Sartre, J.-P. 1992. Notebooks for an Ethics (trans: Pellauer, D.). Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  35. Sartre, J.-P. 1998. Being and Nothingness (trans: Barnes, H.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Sartre, J.-P. 2004a. Critique of Practical Reason: Volume I (trans: Sheridan-Smith, A.). London: Verso.Google Scholar
  37. Sartre, J.-P. 2004b. The Imaginary (trans: Webber, J.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  38. Sánchez, A.M. 2015. Shame and the Internalized Other. Etica & Politica XVII(1): 180–199.Google Scholar
  39. Silfver, M. 2007. Coping with Guilt and Shame: A Narrative Approach. Journal of Moral Education 36(2): 169–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Smilansky, S. 2007. Ten Moral Paradoxes. Malden: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tangney, J., and R. Dearing. 2002. Shame and Guilt. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  42. Taylor, G. 1985. Pride, Shame, and Guilt: Emotions of Self-Assessment. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  43. Thomasen, K. 2015. Shame, Violence, and Morality. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 91(1): 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Weiner, B. 2006. Social Motivation, Justice, and the Moral Emotions: An Attributional Approach. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Weiner, B. 2010. The Development of an Attribution-Based Theory of Motivation: A History of Ideas. Educational Psychologist 45(1): 28–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Williams, B. 1993. Shame and Necessity. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  47. Williams, B. 2002. Truth and Truthfulness. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Wollheim, R. 1999. On the Emotions. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Zahavi, D. 2014. Self and Other: Exploring Subjectivity, Empathy, and Shame. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyMary Immaculate CollegeLimerickIreland

Personalised recommendations