Advertisement

Continental Philosophy Review

, Volume 51, Issue 4, pp 549–564 | Cite as

Bergson’s panpsychism

  • Joël Dolbeault
Article
  • 94 Downloads

Abstract

Physical processes manifest an objective order that science manages to discover. Commonly, it is considered that these processes obey the “laws of nature.” Bergson disputes this idea which ultimately constitutes a kind of Platonism. In contrast, he develops the idea that physical processes are a particular case of automatic behaviors. In this sense, they imply a motor memory immanent to matter, whose actions are triggered by some perceptions. This approach is obviously panpsychist. It gives matter a certain consciousness, even if the latter is different in nature from our consciousness. In some respects, this approach is similar to contemporary panpsychism because it claims that the psychic is a fundamental characteristic of nature, causally active. But it is also original because it does not constitute a theory of the origin of mind in nature.

Keywords

Bergson Panpsychism Laws of nature Philosophy of mind 

References

  1. Ansell-Pearson, Keith. 2002. Philosophy and the Adventure of the Virtual: Bergson and the Time of Life. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Armstrong, David. 1983. What is a Law of Nature?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Barnard, William. 2011. Living Consciousness: The Metaphysical Vision of Henri Bergson. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bergson, Henri. 2001. Time and Free Will. F. L. Pogson (Trans.). New York: Dover.Google Scholar
  5. Bergson, Henri. 1991. Matter and Memory. Nancy Paul & Scott Palmer (Trans.). New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
  6. Bergson, Henri. 1998. Creative Evolution. Arthur Mitchell (Trans.). New York: Dover.Google Scholar
  7. Bergson, Henri. 1965. Duration and Simultaneity. Leon Jacobson (Trans.). New York: The Bobbs-Merrill Company.Google Scholar
  8. Bergson, Henri. 1977. The Two Sources of Morality and Religion. Ashley Audra & Cloudesley Brereton (Trans.). Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bergson, Henri. 1920. Mind-Energy. Wildon Carr (Trans.). London: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  10. Bergson, Henri. 2007. The Creative Mind. Mabelle Andison (Trans.). New York: Dover.Google Scholar
  11. Bergson, Henri. 2017. Histoire de l’idée de temps. Cours au Collège de France 1902–1903. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  12. Canales, Jimena. 2015. The Physicist and the Philosopher. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Capek, Milic. 1971. Bergson and Modern Physics. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cartwright, Nancy. 1983. How the Laws of Physics Lie. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cartwright, Nancy. 2016. The Dethronement of Laws in Science. In Rethinking Order, ed. N. Cartwright and Keith Ward, 25–51. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
  16. Chalmers, Alan. 2009. The Scientist’s Atom and the Philosopher’s Stone. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chalmers, David. 2015. Panpsychism and Panprotopsychism. In Consciousness in the Physical World, ed. Torin Alter and Yujin Nagasawa, 246–276. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Deleuze, Gilles. 1966. Le bergsonisme. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  19. Dretske, Fred. 1977. Laws of Nature. Philosophy of Science 44 (2): 248–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Einstein, Albert. 1996. Relativity: the Special and the General Theory. In The collected papers of Albert Einstein, vol. 6, doc. 42. Princeton: Princeton University Press. http://einsteinpapers.press.princeton.edu/vol6-trans/406.
  21. Fell, Elena. 2012. Duration, Temporality, Self: Prospects for the Future of Bergsonism. Oxford: P. Lang.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Griffin, David. 1998. Unsnarling the World Knot. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  23. Guerlac, Suzanne. 2006. Thinking in Time: An Introduction to Henri Bergson. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Gunter, Pete. 1971. Bergson’s Theory of Matter and Modern Cosmology. Journal of the History of Ideas 32 (4): 525–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jankélévitch, Vladimir. 1959. Henri Bergson. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  26. Kolakowski, Leszek. 1985. Bergson. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Lacey, Alan. 1989. Bergson. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Lawlor, Leonard. 2003. The Challenge of Bergsonism. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  29. Miquel, Paul-Antoine. 2010. Commentaire. In L’évolution créatrice de Bergson, ed. Arnaud François, 175–250. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
  30. Moore, Francis. 1996. Bergson. Thinking Backwards. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mullarkey, John. 1999. Bergson and Philosophy. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Nagel, Thomas. 2012. Mind and Cosmos. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Peirce, Charles. 1891. The Architecture of Theories. In the Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, vol. VI, 6.7–6.34. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Peirce, Charles. 1892a. The Doctrine of Necessity Examined. In the Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, vol. VI, 6.35–6.65. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Peirce, Charles. 1892b. Man’s Glassy Essence. In the Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, vol. VI, 6.238–6.271. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Penrose, Roger. 1997. The Large, the Small and the Human Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Planck, Max. 1949. Religion and Natural Science. In Scientific Autobiography. New York: Philosophical Library.Google Scholar
  38. Popper, Karl. 1992. Unended Quest. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Riquier, Camille. 2009. Archéologie de Bergson: temps et métaphysique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Seager, William. 1995. Consciousness, Information and Panpsychism. Journal of Consciousness Studies 2 (3): 272–288.Google Scholar
  41. Seager, William. 2012. Emergentist Panpsychism. Journal of Consciousness Studies 19 (9–10): 19–39.Google Scholar
  42. Skrbina, David. 2005. Panpsychism in the West. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  43. Strawson, Galen. 2006. Realistic Monism: Why Physicalism Entails Panpsychism. In Consciousness and its Place in Nature, ed. Anthony Freeman, 3–31. Exeter: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar
  44. Strawson, Galen. 2010. Mental Reality, 2nd ed. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  45. Tooley, Michael. 1977. The Nature of Laws. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 7 (4): 667–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Uzan, Jean-Philippe. 2003. Dimensions et constantes fondamentales. In Le réel et ses dimensions, ed. Gilles Cohen-Tannoudji and Emile Noël, 25–56. Les Ulis: EDP Sciences.Google Scholar
  47. Worms, Frédéric. 1997. Introduction à Matière et mémoire de Bergson. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  48. Worms, Frédéric. 2004. Bergson ou les deux sens de la vie. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Domaine universitaire du Pont de BoisUniversity of Lille-IIIVilleneuve-d’AscqFrance
  2. 2.Noisy-le-GrandFrance

Personalised recommendations