Continental Philosophy Review

, Volume 51, Issue 1, pp 23–41 | Cite as

Process as reality: Kierkegaard’s aesthetic approach to the ethical

  • Michael J. Matthis


This paper makes the point that Kierkegaard’s ideas concerning individuality cannot be understood clearly without placing them in the context of what I am calling ontological isolation. This means the radical deprivation by selfhood of every aspect of reality, to the point where not even the possibility or illusion of reality is available to the self. In this context the self is required to become itself, forming itself in and out of its own absolute nothingness, ontological destitution, or wrongness. With this form of isolation as our investigative key, we unlock what Kierkegaard means by his command to become a self, where becoming itself, in absence of prior possibility, constitutes the reality of self, and why Kierkegaard places crucial emphasis, contrary to the tradition, on the priority of negativity. By having the self originate itself in “absolute difficulty,” or that wherein the act itself, or pure doing without result, is primary, Kierkegaard now replaces metaphysics with ethics in order of priority, and places the self inseparably in a world that responds directly to that act. I show here a parallel between Kierkegaard’s approach to ethical action with that of artistic creation of a kind of world, the work of art. In doing so I reveal the inadequacy of interpretations that would impose traditional forms of isolation, social and cosmic, on Kierkegaard, as some of his critics do, or that would place Kierkegaard’s ethics within traditional developmental models, as many of his sympathizers do.


Self Act Isolation Ethical Aesthetic Developmentalism 


  1. Beckett, Samuel. 1965. Proust: Three dialogues with Georges Duthuit. London: Calderbooks.Google Scholar
  2. Caputo, John D. 2007. How to read Kierkegaard. London: Granta Books.Google Scholar
  3. Davenport, John J. 2001. Toward an existential virtue ethics: Kierkegaard and MacIntyre. In Kierkegaard after MacIntyre, ed. John J. Davenport and Anthony Rudd. Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
  4. Fremstedal, Roe. 2014. Kierkegaard and Kant on radical evil and the highest good. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  5. Hannay, Alastair. 1982. Kierkegaard. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Kierkegaard, Soren. 1941. Concluding unscientific postscript (trans: Swenson, D. and Lowrie, W.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Kierkegaard, Soren. 1943. Every good and every perfect gift is from above. In Edifying discourses (trans: Swenson, D. F. and Swenson, L. M.). Minneapolis: Augsburg Publishing House.Google Scholar
  8. Kierkegaard, Soren. 1944. The concept of dread (trans: Lowrie, W.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Kierkegaard, Soren. 1956. Purity of heart is to will one thing (trans: Steele, D.). New York: Harper Perrenial.Google Scholar
  10. Kierkegaard, Soren. 1962. The works of love (trans: Hong, H. and Hong, E.). New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  11. Kierkegaard, Soren. 1967–1975. Journals and papers (trans: Hong, H. and Hong, E.), 4 vols. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Kierkegaard, Soren. 1968a. Judge for yourselves! In For self-examination and judge for yourselves!(trans: Lowrie, W.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Kierkegaard, Soren. 1968b. Fear and trembling. In Fear and trembling and the sickness unto death (trans: Lowrie, W.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Kierkegaard, Soren. 1968c. The sickness unto death. In Fear and trembling and the sickness unto death (trans: Lowrie, W.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Kierkegaard, Soren. 1971. Either/Or (trans: Lowrie, W.), 2 vols. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  16. MacIntyre, Alisdaire. 1981. After virtue: A study in moral theory. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  17. Mackey, Louis. 1972. The loss of the world in Kierkegaard’s ethics. In Kierkegaard, a collection of critical essays, ed. Josiah Thompson. Doubleday and Co: Garden City, New York.Google Scholar
  18. Mehl, Peter J. 2001. Kierkegaard and the relativist challenge to practical philosophy. In Kierkegaard after MacIntyre, ed. John J. Davenport and Anthony Rudd. Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
  19. Naifte, Steven, and Gregory White Smith. 1991. Jackson Pollock, an American saga. New York: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
  20. Plath, Sylvia. 1983. The journals of Sylvia Plath, ed. Ted Hughes and Frances McCullough. New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
  21. Rudd, Anthony. 1993. Kierkegaard and the limits of the ethical. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Solomon, Deborah. 1987. Jackson Pollock, a biography. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  23. Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1958 (trans: Anscombe, G.E.M.). New York: Macmillan Company.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of English, Modern Languages and PhilosophyLamar UniversityBeaumontUSA

Personalised recommendations