Continental Philosophy Review

, Volume 51, Issue 1, pp 1–21 | Cite as

Against Levinas’ messianic politics: a polemic

  • Jason Caro


Blamelessly, most commentators attempt to deduce the political theory of Levinas from his interhuman philosophy. In contrast to the perceived state of ethical life in contemporary politics, the attractiveness of the asymmetric obligations owed by the ego to the Other make the deductive project seem urgent. But an inductive analysis of Levinas’ philosophy yields troubling prerequisites, including rigorous theocracy and a form of sociability in which no epistemological clarity is permitted that could determine in situ interpersonal duties. Such unfamiliar politics enable the celebrated ethical relation of self for the Other. Designed as a polemic with the presumption that politics not ethics is first philosophy, the insights of the inductive analysis of Levinas’ thought will come as no surprise to observers who worry that power and sovereignty cannot be summarily excluded from social or even ethical relations.


Liberalism Theology Democracy Deliverance Zionism Sovereignty 


  1. Alford, C.Fred. 2004. Levinas and Political Theory. Political Theory 32(2): 146–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baidou, Alain. 2001. Ethics: An Essay on the Understanding of Evil. Trans. Peter Hallward. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  3. Campbell, David. 1994. The Deterritorialization of Responsibility: Levinas, Derrida, and Ethics After the End of Philosophy. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 19(4): 465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Caro, Jason. 2009. Levinas and the Palestinians. Philosophy and Social Criticism 35(6): 671–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Caro, Jason. 2011. Origins of Free Peoples. New York: Continuum International Publishing.Google Scholar
  6. Caygill, Howard. 2002. Levinas and the Political. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Cole, Douglas. 1989. The Principle of Function. In The Pluralist Theory of the State: Selected Writings of G. D. H. Cole, J. N. Figgis, and H. J. Laski, ed. Paul Hirst. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Critchley, Simon. 2004. Five Problems in Levinas’s View of Politics and the Sketch of a Solution to Them. Political Theory 32(2): 172–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Derrida, Jacques. 1999. Adieu to Emmanuel Levinas. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Garrett, Frank. 2013. Facing (and yet not facing) East. In Levinas and Asian Thought, eds. Frank Garrett, Leah Kalmanson, and Sarah Mattice, 13–26. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Hägglund, Martin. 2004. The Necessity of Discrimination: Disjoining Derrida and Levinas. Diacritics 34(1): 40–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Herzog, Annabel. 2002. Is Liberalism ‘All We Need’?: Lévinas’s Politics of Surplus. Political Theory 30(2): 204–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Honig, Bonnie. 1993. Political Theory and the Displacement of Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Kalmanson, Leah, and Mattice, Sarah. 2013. Introduction. In Levinas and Asian Thought, eds. Frank Garrett, Leah Kalmanson, and Sarah Mattice, 1–12. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Levinas, Emmanuel. 1989. The Levinas Reader. ed. Sean Hand. Great Britain: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  16. Levinas, Emmanuel. 1990a. Reflections on the Philosophy of Hitlerism. Critical Inquiry 17(1): 62–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Levinas, Emmanuel. 1990b. La signification et le sens. In Humanisme de l’autre homme. Paris: Livre de Poche.Google Scholar
  18. Levinas, Emmanuel. 1990c. Difficult Freedom: Essays on Judaism. Trans. Sean Hand. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Levinas, Emmanuel. 1994a. Beyond the Verse: Talmudic Readings and Lectures. Trans. Gary D. Mole. London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
  20. Levinas, Emmanuel. 1994b. In the Time of Nations. London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
  21. Levinas, Emmanuel. 1994c. Les imprevus de l’histoire. Montpellier: Fata Morgana.Google Scholar
  22. Levinas, Emmanuel 1996. Meaning and Sense. In Basic Philosophical Writings, eds. Adriaan Theodoor Peperzak, Robert Bernasconi, Simon Critchley, 59–71. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Levinas, Emmanuel. 1998. Entre Nous: Thinking of the Other. Trans. Michael B. Smith and Barbara Harshav. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Levinas, Emmanuel. 1999a. Otherwise than Being or Beyond Essence. Trans. A. Lingis. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Levinas, Emmanuel. 1999b. Alterity and Transcendence. Trans. Michael B. Smith. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Loumansky, Amanda. 2005. Levinas, Israel, and the Call to Conscience. Law and Critique 16(2): 181–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McCormick, John. 2001. Machiavellian. Democracy: Controlling. Elites with Ferocious Populism. American Political Science Review 95(2): 297–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Schmitt, Carl. 1996. Political Theology. Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  29. Shankman, Steven. 2013. The Legalist Betrayal of the Confucian Other. In Levinas and Asian Thought, eds. Frank Garrett, Leah Kalmanson, and Sarah Mattice, 41–52. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Steiner, David. 2001. Levinas’ Ethical Interruption of Reciprocity. Salmagundi 130(131): 120–142.Google Scholar
  31. Wingenbach, E. 1999. Refusing the Temptation of Innocence: Levinasian Ethics as Political Theory. Strategies 12(1): 219–238.Google Scholar
  32. Wyschogrod, Edith. 2000. The Problem of Ethical Metaphysics. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Social SciencesUniversity of Houston-DowntownHoustonUSA

Personalised recommendations