Continental Philosophy Review

, Volume 48, Issue 4, pp 479–496 | Cite as

The element of intersubjectivity. Heidegger’s early conception of empathy

Article
  • 350 Downloads

Abstract

Heidegger’s doubts concerning the concept of “empathy” are unequivocally proven not only by his general tendency to avoid it, but also by his sharp critique of this term, as presented in both Being and Time and the lectures from the Summer Semester 1925, History of the Concept of Time. However, the concept of empathy is used by Heidegger in a positive, albeit rather allusive fashion, in three consecutive lectures of his early Freiburg period: Basic Problems of Phenomenology (Winter Semester 1919/20), Phenomenology of Intuition and Expression (Summer Semester 1920) and The Phenomenology of Religious Life (Winter Semester 1920/21). The present paper analyzes these three passages of Heidegger’s early lectures in close detail, revealing their connection to the conceptions of empathy found in the works of both Dilthey and Scheler. Thus it aims to connect Heidegger’s rather idiosyncratic conception of intersubjectivity with some of the discussions on that topic in the phenomenological millieu of the early 1920s.

Keywords

Empathy Heidegger Historicity Dilthey Scheler Intersubjectivity 

References

  1. Agosta, Lou. 2010. Empathy in the context of philosophy. New York: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Dahlstrom, Daniel O. 2002. Scheler’s critique of Heidegger’s fundamental ontology. In Max Scheler’s acting persons: New perspectives, ed. S. Schneck, 67–92. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
  3. Dilthey, Wilhelm. 1979. Der Aufbau der geschichtlichen Welt in den Geisteswissenschaften. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht. The formation of the historical world in the human sciences. Trans. R.A. Makkreel and J. Scanlon. Princeton: Princeton University Press (2002).Google Scholar
  4. Ferencz-Flatz, Christian. 2010. Der Begriff ‘Bekundung’ bei Husserl und Heidegger. Husserl Studies 26: 189–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ferencz-Flatz, Christian. 2011. The empathetic apprehension of artifacts: a Husserlian approach to non-figurative art. Research in Phenomenology 41: 358–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Flynn, Molly Brigid. 2009. The living body as the origin of culture: what the shift in Husserl’s notion of ‘expression’ tells us about cultural objects. Husserl Studies 25: 73–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gorevan, Patrick. 1993. Heidegger and scheler. A dialogue. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 24: 276–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Heidegger, Martin. 1988. Ontologie. Hermeneutik der Faktizität (SS 1923). GA 63. Frankfurt/Main: Klostermann. Ontology: The hermeneutics of facticity. Trans. J. Van Buren. Bloomington: Indiana University Press (1999).Google Scholar
  9. Heidegger, Martin. 1992. Platon: Sophistes. GA 19. Frankfurt/Main: Klostermann. Plato’s sophist. Trans. R. Rojcewicz and A. Schuwer. Bloomington: Indiana University Press (2003).Google Scholar
  10. Heidegger, Martin. 1994a. Prolegomena zur Geschichte des Zeitbegriffs (SS 1925). GA 20. Frankfurt/Main: Klostermann. History of the concept of time. Trans. Th. Kisiel. Bloomington: Indiana University Press (1985).Google Scholar
  11. Heidegger, Martin. 1994b. Phänomenologische Interpretationen zu Aristoteles. Einführung in die phänomenologische Forschung (WS 1921/1922). GA 61. Frankfurt/Main: Klostermann. Phenomenological interpretations of aristotle: Initiation into phenomenology. Trans. R. Rojcewicz. Bloomington: Indiana University Press (2001).Google Scholar
  12. Heidegger, Martin. 1995. Phänomenologie des religiösen Lebens. GA 60. Frankfurt/Main: Klostermann. The phenomenology of religious life. Trans. M. Fritsch and J.A. Gosetti-Ferencei. Bloomington: Indiana University Press (2010).Google Scholar
  13. Heidegger, Martin. 1998. Logik als die Frage nach dem Wesen der Sprache. GA 38. Frankfurt/Main: Klostermann.Google Scholar
  14. Heidegger, Martin. 2005. Phänomenologische Interpretationen zu Aristoteles (Anzeige der hermeneutischen Situation). Ausarbeitung für die Marburger und die Göttinger Philosophische Fakultät (Herbst 1922). In Phänomenologische Interpretationen ausgewählter Abhandlungen des Aristoteles zur Ontologie und Logik. GA 62. Frankfurt/Main: Klostermann: 343–399. Indication of the Hermeneutical Situation. In The Heidegger Reader. ed. G. Figal. Trans. J. Veith. 38–61. Bloomington: Indiana University Press (2009).Google Scholar
  15. Heidegger, Martin. 2006. Sein und Zeit. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Being and time. Trans. J. Stambaugh. New York: SUNY (1996).Google Scholar
  16. Heidegger, Martin. 2007. Phänomenologie der Anschauung und des Ausdrucks. Theorie der philosophischen Begriffsbildung (SS 1920). GA 59. Frankfurt/Main: Klostermann. Phenomenology of intuition and expression. Trans. T. Colony. London: Bloomsburry (2010).Google Scholar
  17. Heidegger, Martin. 2010. Grundprobleme der Phänomenologie (WS 1919/1920). GA 58. Frankfurt/Main: Klostermann. Basic problems of phenomenology: Winter semester 1919/1920. Trans. S.M. Campbell. London: Bloomsburry (2012).Google Scholar
  18. Husserl, Edmund. 1952. Ideen zur einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Zweites Buch: Phänomenologische Untersuchungen zur Konstitution. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy. Second book: Studies in the phenomenology of constitution. Trans. R. Rojcewicz and A. Schuwer. Dordrecht: Kluwer (1989).Google Scholar
  19. Husserl, Edmund. 1992. Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Phänomenologie. Ergänzungsband. Texte aus dem Nachlass 1934–1937. Hua XXIX. The Hague: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  20. Husserl, Edmund. 2008. Die Lebenswelt. Auslegungen der vorgegebenen Welt und ihrer Konstitution. Texte aus dem Nachlass (1916–1937). Hua XXXIX. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  21. Kroner, Richard. 1919. Das Problem der historischen Biologie. Berlin: Gebrüder Bornträger.Google Scholar
  22. Scheler, Max. 1973. Wesen und Formen der Sympathie. Bern & München: Francke. The nature of sympathy. Trans. P. Heath. London: Routledge (1954).Google Scholar
  23. Stein, Edith. 2010. Zum Problem der Einfühlung. Stuttgart: Herder. On the problem of empathy. Trans. W. Stein. Washington: ICS Publications (1989).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Research in the HumanitiesUniversity of BucharestBucharestRomania
  2. 2.Romanian Society for PhenomenologyBucharestRomania

Personalised recommendations