Advertisement

Continental Philosophy Review

, Volume 48, Issue 3, pp 341–358 | Cite as

From freedom to equality: Rancière and the aesthetic experience of equality

  • Rika DunlapEmail author
Article
  • 446 Downloads

Abstract

This article examines Rancière’s political reading of aesthetics through a historical analysis into the two aesthetic theories of freedom at work in Rancière’s philosophy; Kant’s freedom as self-governance and Schiller’s freedom as harmony. While aesthetic experience is considered morally conducive through its association with freedom, this article argues that Rancière translates such discussions of freedom into that of equality by extracting the political dimensions of aesthetic experience. Given that art has the unique ability to empower the spectator through its aesthetic experience of equality, the true political potential of art arises from its power to redistribute the sensible rather than through the overt expression of political themes. By juxtaposing Rancière’s politics of art with Kant’s beauty as the symbol of morality, this article argues that art becomes a symbol of political emancipation for Rancière in its capacity to generate the experience of equality. Inasmuch as Rancière attributes the aesthetic revolution to the eighteenth century, it becomes evident that the empowerment of the spectator has been central to art since the inauguration of the aesthetic regime.

Keywords

Rancière Kant Schiller Aesthetics Equality Freedom 

References

  1. Beiser, Frederick. 2005. Schiller as philosopher. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Citton, Yves. 2010. “The ignorant schoolmaster”: Knowledge and authority. In Jacques Rancière: Key concepts, ed. Jean-Philippe Deranty, 25–37. Durham: Acumen Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  3. Deranty, Jean-Philippe. 2003. Jacques Rancière’s contribution to the ethics of recognition. Political Theory 31: 136–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Guyer, Paul. 1996. Kant and the experience of freedom. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Kant, Immanuel. 1987. Critique of judgment. Trans. Werner Pluhar. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  6. May, Todd. 2008. The political thought of Jacques Rancière. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Mecchia, Giuseppina. 2010. Philosophy and its poor: Rancière’s critique of philosophy. In Jacques Rancière: key concepts, ed. Jean-Philippe Deranty, 38–54. Durham: Acumen Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  8. Rancière, Jacques. 2002. The aesthetic revolution and its outcomes. New Left Review 14: 133–151.Google Scholar
  9. Rancière, Jacques. 2009. Aesthetics and its discontents. Trans. Steven Corcoran. Malden: Polity.Google Scholar
  10. Rancière, Jacques. 2010. Dissensus on politics and aesthetics. Trans. Steven Corcoran. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  11. Rancière, Jacques. 2011. The emancipated spectator. Trans. Gregory Elliott. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  12. Rancière, Jacques. 2013. Aisthesis. Trans. Zakir Paul. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  13. Ross, Kristin. 1991. Rancière and the practice of equality. Social Text 29: 57–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ross, Toni. 2010. Image, montage. In Jacques Rancière: key concepts, ed. Jean-Philippe Deranty, 151–168. Durham: Acumen Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  15. Schiller, Friedrich. 2004. On the aesthetic education of man. Trans. Reginald Snell. Mineola, New York: Dover Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
  16. Tanke, Joseph. 2011. Jacques Rancière: An introduction. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.North PoleUSA
  2. 2.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of Hawaii, MānoaHonoluluUSA

Personalised recommendations