Continental Philosophy Review

, Volume 52, Issue 1, pp 51–74 | Cite as

Killing the father, Parmenides: On Lacan’s anti-philosophy

  • Matthew SharpeEmail author


This paper examines the historical claims about philosophy, dating back to Parmenides, that we argue underlie Jacques Lacan’s polemical provocations in the mid-1970s that his position was an “anti-philosophie”. Following an introduction surveying the existing literature on the subject, in part ii, we systematically present the account of classical philosophy Lacan has in mind when he declares psychoanalysis to be an antiphilosophy after 1975, assembling his claims about the history of ideas in Seminars XVII and XX in ways earlier contributions of this subject have not systematically done. In part iii, focusing upon Lacan’s remarkable reading of Descartes’ break with premodern philosophy—but touching on Lacan’s readings of Hegel and (in a remarkable confirmation of Lacan’s “Parmenidean” conception of philosophy) the early Wittgenstein—we examine Lacan’s positioning of psychoanalysis as a legatee of the Cartesian moment in the history of western ideas, nearly-contemporary with Galileo’s mathematization of physics and carried forwards by Kant’s critical philosophy and account of the substanceless subject of apperception. In different terms than Slavoj Žižek, we propose that it is Lacan’s famous avowal that the subject of the psychoanalysis is the subject first essayed by Descartes in The Meditations on First Philosophy as confronting an other capable of deceit (as against mere illusion or falsity) that decisively measures the distance between Lacan’s unique “antiphilosophy” and the forms of later modern linguistic and cultural relativism whose hegemony Alain Badiou has decried, at the same time as it sets Lacan’s antiphilosophy apart from the Parmenidean legacy for which thinking and being could be the same.


Lacan Parmenides Psychoanalysis Antiphilosophy Descartes 


  1. Badiou, Alain. 1992. Casser en deux l’histoire du monde? Paris: Le Perroquet.Google Scholar
  2. Badiou, Alain. 1994–1995. «1994-95: Séminaire sur Lacan», (notes d’Aime Thiault et transcription de François Duvert). Accessed May 2015.
  3. Badiou, Alain. 1999a. Conditions. Trans. S. Corcoran. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  4. Badiou, Alain. 1999b. Manifesto for philosophy. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  5. Badiou, Alain. 2005. Infinite thought: Truth and the return to philosophy. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  6. Badiou, Alain. 2006. Bodies, languages, truths. Perfume. Accessed May 2015.
  7. Badiou, Alain. 2009. Antiphilosophy: Plato and Lacan. In Conditions, 228–248. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  8. Bosteels, Bruno. 2008. Radical antiphilosophy. Filozofski vestnik XXIX(2): 155–187.Google Scholar
  9. Braungardt, Jürgen. 2002. Thinking and being: Lacan versus Parmenides. Accessed May 2015.
  10. Fink, Bruce. 1996. The Lacanian subject: Between language and jouissance. USA: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Freud, Sigmund. 1927. The future of an illusion. In Standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud, vol. XXI, ed. J. Strachey, 1–56. London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
  12. Gourevitch, Victor. 1987. The problem of natural right and the fundamental alternatives in natural right and history. In The crisis of liberal democracy: A Straussian perspective, ed. K.L. Deutsch and W. Soffer, 30–47. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  13. Green, Mitchell S. 2002. The inferential significance of Frege’s assertion sign. Facta Philosophica 4(2): 1–35.Google Scholar
  14. Hadot, Pierre. 1996. Philosophy as a way of life. (trans: Chase, M.). London: Wiley.Google Scholar
  15. Johnston, Adrian. 2010a. This philosophy which is not one: Jean-Claude Milner, Alain Badiou, and Lacanian antiphilosophy. S: Journal of the Jan van Eyck Circle for Lacanian Ideology Critique 3: 137–158.
  16. Johnston, Adrian. 2010b. Turning the sciences inside out: Revisiting Lacan’s ‘science and truth’. In Concept and form: The cahiers pour l’analyse and contemporary French thought, ed. Peter Hallward, Christian Kerslake, and Knox Peden. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  17. Koyré, Alexandre. 1958. From the closed world to the infinite universe. New York: Harper Torchbooks.Google Scholar
  18. Lacan, Jacques. 1960. Transference 19601961. The seminar of Jacques Lacan (trans: Gallagher, C.). London: Kornac.Google Scholar
  19. Lacan, Jacques. 1980. Monsieur A. Ornicar? 21–22, Summer, 17–20.Google Scholar
  20. Lacan, Jacques. 1988. Freud’s papers on technique 1953–1954. The seminar of Jacques Lacan. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
  21. Lacan, Jacques. 1997. The psychoses 1955–1956. The seminar of Jacques Lacan book IIII. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
  22. Lacan, Jacques. 1998a. Encore. The seminar of Jacques Lacan book XX. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
  23. Lacan, Jacques. 1998b. Seminar XI: the four fundamental concepts of psychoanalysis. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
  24. Lacan, Jacques. 2001. Peut-etre a Vincennes. In Autres Ecrits, ed. Jacques-Alain Miller, Paris: Editions du Seuil.Google Scholar
  25. Lacan, Jacques. 2006a. In Écrits: The first complete edition in English. Trans. B. Fink. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  26. Lacan, Jacques. 2006b. In Écrits: The first complete edition in English. Trans. B. Fink. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  27. Lacan, Jacques. 2006c. In Écrits: The first complete edition in English. Trans. B. Fink. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  28. Lacan, Jacques. 2006d. In Écrits: The first complete edition in English. Trans. B. Fink. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  29. Lacan, Jacques. 2006e. In Écrits: The first complete edition in English. Trans. B. Fink. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  30. Lacan, Jacques. 2006f. The function and field of speech and language in psychoanalysis. Écrits: The first complete edition in English (trans: Fink, Bruce). New York: W.W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar
  31. Lacan, Jacques. 2007. The other side of psychoanalysis. The seminar of Jacques Lacan. New York: WW Norton & Co.Google Scholar
  32. Milner, Jean-Claude. 1995. L’œuvre Claire: Lacan la science, la philosophie. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.Google Scholar
  33. Regnault, François. 1997. L’antiphilosophie selon Lacan. In Conférences d’esthétique lacanienne, 57–80. Paris: Agalma.Google Scholar
  34. Sharpe, Matthew. 2008a. Kant, or the crack in the universal: Slavoj Zizek’s politicising of the transcendental turn. International Journal of Zizek Studies 2: 2.Google Scholar
  35. Sharpe, Matthew. 2008b. In the name of the father: God in Lacan: Christian or Judaic? Psychoanalytische Perspectieven 26(3/4): 2008.Google Scholar
  36. Shepherdson, Charles. 2003. Lacan and philosophy. In Cambridge companion to Lacan, ed. J.-M. Rabate, 116–152. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Soulez, Antonia. 2007. Science of the subject, science of the real: Lacan from the perspective of Hintikka and Wittgenstein. Analysis 13: 131–150.Google Scholar
  38. Soler, Colette. 2006. Lacan en antiphilosophie. Filozofski Vestnik: Philosophie, psychanalyse: alliance ou mésalliance?, ed. Šumič-Riha, Jelica, Vol. 2, no. 2, 121–144.Google Scholar
  39. Strauss, Leo. 1958. Thoughts on Machiavelli. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  40. Žižek, Slavoj. 1993a. The Ticklish subject. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Žižek, Slavoj. 1993b. Tarrying with the negative: Kant, Hegel, and the critique of ideology. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Žižek, Slavoj (ed.). 1998. Cogito and the subject of the unconscious. Durham: Duke Univerity Press.Google Scholar
  43. Žižek, Slavoj. 1999. The Ticklish subject: The absent centre of political ontology. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Philosophy Department, School of Arts and EducationDeakin UniversityWaurn PondsAustralia

Personalised recommendations